Skip to main content

Circumstances of Well-Being Among Czech College Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Well-Being and Cultures

Part of the book series: Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology ((CAPP,volume 3))

Abstract

Objectives. The study focused on relations between well-being and personality characteristics, values, social desirability, self-concept and self-determining needs in a sample of Czech college students.

Methods. The analyses were conducted using Satisfaction with Life Scale, Schwartz Value Survey, Scales of Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Crowne-Marlowe Social Desirability Scale, Self-Construal Scale, NEO FFI and self-determining needs.

Results. The data (N = 535) revealed strong association between life satisfaction and self-acceptance and between satisfaction and environmental mastery. Interesting relations were also found between life satisfaction and Big Five factors, self-determining needs (competency, autonomy and relatedness), conformity, safety and benevolence within the Schwartz value system, independency (Self-Construal Scale) and social desirability.

Limits of the Study. The study was conducted as part of the nationwide research focusing on college students’ well-being. Only a part of the results could be compared to the results of the total sample, as so far there has been only part of the results published.

The study was funded by the Czech Science Foundation, project no. P407/11/2226.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Schwartz system correlates, apart from other areas, with delinquency, political party preferences, choice of field of study, learning how to use technological innovations, readiness to work, authoritarian attitudes, egalitarian attitudes in relation to gender, creativity, risk-involving behaviour, willingness to help, identification with own nation, etc.

References

  • Blatný, M. (2001). Osobnostní determinanty sebehodnocení a životní spokojenosti: mezipohlavní rozdíly [Personality determinants of self-esteem and life satisfaction: Gender differences]. Československá psychologie, 45, 385–392. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatný, M., Jelínek, M., Bližkovská, J., & Klimusová, H. (2004). Personality correlates of self-esteem and life satisfaction. Studia psychologica, 46, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boski, P. (2008, July 20–25). Unraveling the mysteries of the post-communist world: Cynicism that breeds mistrust and unhappiness – A cultural analysis of a cross cultural phenomenon. In 29th International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., González, M., Figuer, C., & Coenders, G. (2004). Life-satisfaction, values and goal achievement: The case of planned versus chance searches on internet. Social Indicators Research, 66(1–2), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contribution of the Ed Diener laboratory to the scientific understanding of well-being. (2005). http://www.psych.uiuc.edu/∼ediener/Discoveries.htm. Accessed 8 Jan 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R revised NEO personality inventory (NEOPI-R). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Gore, J. S., & Morris, M. L. (2003). The relational-independent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Understanding scores on the satisfaction with life scale. http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/∼ediener/Documents/Understanding%20SWLS%20Scores.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Gallagher, D. (1991). Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hnilica, K. (2005a). Vlivy politické orientace, sociálního srovnávání se a osobnosti na spokojenost se životem [Influences of political orientation, social comparison and personality on satisfaction with life]. Československá psychologie, 49, 97–116. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hnilica, K. (2005b). Vlivy materialistické hodnotové orientace na spokojenost se životem [Influences of materialistic value orientation on life satisfaction]. Československá psychologie, 49, 385–398. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hnilica, K. (2007). Vývoj a změny hodnot v dospělosti [Development and changes in values in adulthood]. Československá psychologie, 51, 437–463. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hřebíčková, M., & Čermák, I. (1996). Vnitřní konzistence české verze dotazníku NEO-FFI [Internal consistency of Czech version of NEO-FFI inventory]. Československá psychologie, 40, 208–216. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, A., & Sones, M. J. (1988). Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being: Age comparisons. Social Indicators Research, 20, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smékal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the satisfaction with life scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, J. A., & McKeel, A. J. (1986). Social desirability and psychological well-being reports in late life: A further inquiry. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective. Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1986). Well-being scales do not measure social desirability. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 390–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rask, K., Åstedt-Kurki, P., & Laippala, P. (2002). Adolescent subjective well-being and realized values. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(3), 254–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., Hofer, M., Dietz, F., Reinders, H., & Fries, S. (2005). Value orientations and action conflicts in students’ everyday life: An interview study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2008, July 20–25). Personal values and socially significant behavior. Invited address. In 29th International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Optimal human being: An integrated multilevel perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying needs? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Cheng, C., & Hilpert, J. (2011). Understanding well-being and optimal functioning: Applying the multilevel personality in context (MPIC) model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šolcová, I., & Kebza, V. (2009). Osobní pohoda vysokoškolských studentů: Česká část studie [Well-being in university students: Czech part of the study]. Československá psychologie, 53, 129–139. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1033–1070.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iva Šolcová .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Šolcová, I., Kebza, V. (2013). Circumstances of Well-Being Among Czech College Students. In: Knoop, H., Delle Fave, A. (eds) Well-Being and Cultures. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics