Abstract
Objectives. The study focused on relations between well-being and personality characteristics, values, social desirability, self-concept and self-determining needs in a sample of Czech college students.
Methods. The analyses were conducted using Satisfaction with Life Scale, Schwartz Value Survey, Scales of Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Crowne-Marlowe Social Desirability Scale, Self-Construal Scale, NEO FFI and self-determining needs.
Results. The data (N = 535) revealed strong association between life satisfaction and self-acceptance and between satisfaction and environmental mastery. Interesting relations were also found between life satisfaction and Big Five factors, self-determining needs (competency, autonomy and relatedness), conformity, safety and benevolence within the Schwartz value system, independency (Self-Construal Scale) and social desirability.
Limits of the Study. The study was conducted as part of the nationwide research focusing on college students’ well-being. Only a part of the results could be compared to the results of the total sample, as so far there has been only part of the results published.
The study was funded by the Czech Science Foundation, project no. P407/11/2226.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Schwartz system correlates, apart from other areas, with delinquency, political party preferences, choice of field of study, learning how to use technological innovations, readiness to work, authoritarian attitudes, egalitarian attitudes in relation to gender, creativity, risk-involving behaviour, willingness to help, identification with own nation, etc.
References
Blatný, M. (2001). Osobnostní determinanty sebehodnocení a životní spokojenosti: mezipohlavní rozdíly [Personality determinants of self-esteem and life satisfaction: Gender differences]. Československá psychologie, 45, 385–392. [In Czech.]
Blatný, M., Jelínek, M., Bližkovská, J., & Klimusová, H. (2004). Personality correlates of self-esteem and life satisfaction. Studia psychologica, 46, 97–104.
Boski, P. (2008, July 20–25). Unraveling the mysteries of the post-communist world: Cynicism that breeds mistrust and unhappiness – A cultural analysis of a cross cultural phenomenon. In 29th International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Casas, F., González, M., Figuer, C., & Coenders, G. (2004). Life-satisfaction, values and goal achievement: The case of planned versus chance searches on internet. Social Indicators Research, 66(1–2), 123–141.
Contribution of the Ed Diener laboratory to the scientific understanding of well-being. (2005). http://www.psych.uiuc.edu/∼ediener/Discoveries.htm. Accessed 8 Jan 2011.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R revised NEO personality inventory (NEOPI-R). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cross, S. E., Gore, J. S., & Morris, M. L. (2003). The relational-independent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933–944.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
Diener, E. (2006). Understanding scores on the satisfaction with life scale. http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/∼ediener/Documents/Understanding%20SWLS%20Scores.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2010.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Gallagher, D. (1991). Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 35–56.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.
Hnilica, K. (2005a). Vlivy politické orientace, sociálního srovnávání se a osobnosti na spokojenost se životem [Influences of political orientation, social comparison and personality on satisfaction with life]. Československá psychologie, 49, 97–116. [In Czech.]
Hnilica, K. (2005b). Vlivy materialistické hodnotové orientace na spokojenost se životem [Influences of materialistic value orientation on life satisfaction]. Československá psychologie, 49, 385–398. [In Czech.]
Hnilica, K. (2007). Vývoj a změny hodnot v dospělosti [Development and changes in values in adulthood]. Československá psychologie, 51, 437–463. [In Czech.]
Hřebíčková, M., & Čermák, I. (1996). Vnitřní konzistence české verze dotazníku NEO-FFI [Internal consistency of Czech version of NEO-FFI inventory]. Československá psychologie, 40, 208–216. [In Czech.]
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.
Kozma, A., & Sones, M. J. (1988). Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being: Age comparisons. Social Indicators Research, 20, 1–14.
Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.
Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smékal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the satisfaction with life scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244.
Mancini, J. A., & McKeel, A. J. (1986). Social desirability and psychological well-being reports in late life: A further inquiry. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 89–94.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective. Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568–579.
McCrae, R. R. (1986). Well-being scales do not measure social desirability. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 390–392.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
Rask, K., Åstedt-Kurki, P., & Laippala, P. (2002). Adolescent subjective well-being and realized values. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(3), 254–263.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.
Schmid, S., Hofer, M., Dietz, F., Reinders, H., & Fries, S. (2005). Value orientations and action conflicts in students’ everyday life: An interview study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(3), 243–257.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.
Schwartz, S. H. (2008, July 20–25). Personal values and socially significant behavior. Invited address. In 29th International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–235.
Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Optimal human being: An integrated multilevel perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying needs? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.
Sheldon, K. M., Cheng, C., & Hilpert, J. (2011). Understanding well-being and optimal functioning: Applying the multilevel personality in context (MPIC) model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 1–16.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
Šolcová, I., & Kebza, V. (2009). Osobní pohoda vysokoškolských studentů: Česká část studie [Well-being in university students: Czech part of the study]. Československá psychologie, 53, 129–139. [In Czech.]
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1033–1070.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šolcová, I., Kebza, V. (2013). Circumstances of Well-Being Among Czech College Students. In: Knoop, H., Delle Fave, A. (eds) Well-Being and Cultures. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4611-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4610-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4611-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)