Skip to main content

Pharmacotherapy for Sarcoidosis: An Example of an Off-Label Procedure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 755))

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous multiorgan diseases with an unknown etiology, with the predominant lung involvement. Immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, azathioprinum, ciclosporinum A, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, hydroxychlorochinum, indomethacin, pentoxyfillinum, thalidomide, leflunomidum, and adalimumab, or infliximab have been used in its treatment. It should be emphasized that the Summary of Products Characteristics (SPC) of these drugs does not specifically recommend their use in the therapy for sarcoidosis. That makes the application of the drugs in sarcoidosis an off-label use, which is not formally accepted by the authorities but is supported by medical bibliography or recommendations given by scientific bodies. Thus the off-label drugs raise legal, but also ethical and medical problems. The dosing regimen and the required duration of therapy for sarcoidosis are missing. In effect the therapy usually follows the recommendations from the American and European Respiratory Societies (ATS/ERS), based on the long-term medical research. The American Food and Drug Administration recognizes the existence of the off-label use. European legislations do not precisely specify the rules for the admissibility of the off-label use. The doctrine of law assumes that the off-label use constitutes a medical experiment. Therefore, the commencement of therapy with such drugs requires patients’ informed consent, which must be kept along with other medical records. Insufficient knowledge of the legal regulations may result in civil and professional liability of a physician supervising the therapy of a sarcoidosis patient, especially in case of adverse effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). (2006). Reimbursement for cancer treatment: Coverage of off-label drug indications. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 3206–3208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Thoracic Society (ATS). (1999). Statement on sarcoidosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 160, 736–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, R. P., Costabel, U., & du Bois, R. M. (2008). Treatment of sarcoidosis. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 29, 533–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, A., & Pegoraro, R. (2008). The ethics of off-label use of drugs: Oncology pharmacy in Italy. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 33, 95–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeyer, N. H., Brucklacher, U., Potthoff, A., & Reich-Schupke, S. (2009). Off-label use in dermatology in Germany: What has changed since 2004? Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 7, 938–945.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunne, V., Mertins, G., Reimann, G., & Brockmeyer, N. H. (2004). Off-label use in dermatological practice. The conflict between professional duty and legal requirements. Der Hautarzt, 55, 727–734.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casali, P. G. (2007). The off label use of drugs in oncology: A position paper by the European Society for Medical Oncology. Annals of Oncology, 18, 1923–1925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Doherty, S. D., & Hsu, S. (2010). Innovative uses of thalidomide. Dermatologia Clinica, 28, 577–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, R. K. (2009). Management strategies for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 5, 575–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devita, V. T. (2009). Off-label use of approved drugs. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, 6, 181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A. P. F., & Bitter, H. (2003). Der off-label use. Pharma Recht, 3, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazarian, M., Kelly, M., & McPhee, J. R. (2006). Off-label use of medicines: Consensus recommendations for evaluating appropriateness. The Medical Journal of Australia, 185, 544–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillick, M. R. (2009). Controlling off-label medication use. Annals of Internal Medicine, 150, 344–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, V. (1999). Off-label prescribing legal implications. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 20, 365–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, L. C. (1988). Off-label Rx. Insurers starting to balk. Medical World News, 29, 22–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacqz-Aigrain, E. (2011). Drug policy in Europe. Research and funding in neonates: Current challenges future perspectives new opportunities. Early Human Development, 87(Suppl. 1), S27–S30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, H., & Wilcock, A. (2001). Prescribing of drugs for use outside their licence in palliative care. British Medical Journal, 323, 484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, S. G., & Dooley, M. J. (2004). Off-label prescribing in oncology. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 302–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, M. (2005). Ethical Challenges in Medicine. In M. L. Pava & P. Primeaux (Eds.), Crisis and opportunity in the professions (Research in ethical issues in organizations) (Vol. 6, pp. 21–41). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, A. C., Wendy, M. B., & Judson, M. A. (2010). Pharmacotherapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis. A delphi consensus study. Respiratory Medicine, 104, 717–723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended thereafter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., & Zimmermann, R. (2008). Off-label use of medicinal products – Legal aspects. Farmacja Polska, 64, 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, A., Dubaniewicz, A., Slominski, J.M. (2013). Pharmacotherapy for Sarcoidosis: An Example of an Off-Label Procedure. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 755. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4546-9_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics