Skip to main content

Lung Function at Age 18–25 Years: A Comparison of Different Reference Value Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 755))

Abstract

The anthropometrical data of the Caucasian population have significantly changed within the last five decades. The European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS) assumes a plateau phase and recommends the entry of 25 years old for calculation of reference values in this age range. The question arises if the commonly used reference recommendations for lung function of the ECCS can still be accepted. In the present study standardized spirometric lung function tests were performed by pneumotachography, recording lung volumes and flows (MasterScreen Pneumo, CareFusion, Höchberg) in asymptomatic nonsmoking subjects (202 females, 201 males), aged between 18 and 26, according to the ATS/ERS criteria. The results were compared with the reference recommendations of ECCS, SAPALDIA, LuftiBus, and Bochum (only males). All absolute lung function values showed a correlation (p< 0.05) with height. With respect to FVC and FEV1, SAPALDIA and Bochum reference values were comparable and close to a 100 (range 97.6–101.4) %pred, whereas both ECCS and LuftiBus showed higher values (range 103.6–109.9%pred). The FEV1/FVC ratio was close to a 100 (range 97.6–101.7) %pred in all reference systems, whereas flows showed a wide variability between the reference systems (77.1–114.6%pred), single flows (e.g., 96.9–114.2%pred for MEF50) and males/females (males: 93.6–114.6%pred; females: 77.1–107.9%pred). We conclude that SAPALDIA reference values for FVC and FEV1 should be used, as they better represent lung function in the age group. ECCS and LuftiBus reference values are appreciably (4–10%) lower. Differences between reference systems were less important for the FEV1/FVC ratio and lung flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Thoracic Society. (1991). Lung function testing: Selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 144, 1202–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Thoracic Society. (1995). Standardization of spirometry: 1994 update. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 102, 1107–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandli, O., Schindler, C., Kunzli, N., Keller, R., & Perruchoud, A. P. (1996). Lung function in healthy never smoking adults: Reference values and lower limits of normal of a Swiss population. Thorax, 51, 277–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandli, O., Schindler, C., Leuenberger, P. H., Baur, X., Degens, P., Kunzli, N., Keller, R., & Perruchoud, A. P. (2000). Re-estimated equations for 5th percentiles of lung function variables. Thorax, 55, 173–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crapo, R. O., Morris, A. H., & Gardner, R. M. (1981). Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 123, 659–664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enjeti, S., Hazelwood, B., Permutt, S., Menkes, H., & Terry, P. (1978). Pulmonary function in young smokers: Male–female differences. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 118, 667–676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, P. L., Kronmal, R. A., Higgins, M., Schenker, M., & Haponik, E. F. (1993). Spirometry reference values for women and men 65 to 85 years of age. Cardiovascular health study. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 147, 125–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, J. L., Odencrantz, J. R., & Fedan, K. B. (1999). Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 159, 179–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, R. J., Lebowitz, M. D., Holberg, C. J., & Burrows, B. (1983). Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 127, 725–734.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuster, S. P., Kuster, D., Schindler, C., Rochat, M. K., Braun, J., Held, L., & Brandli, O. (2008). Reference equations for lung function screening of healthy never-smoking adults aged 18–80 years. European Respiratory Journal, 31, 860–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marek, W., Marek, E., Mückenhoff, K., Smith, H. J., Degens, P., Kotschy-Lang, N., & Kohlhäufl, M. (2009). Time for new reference values for ventilatory lung function. European Journal of Medical Research, 14(Suppl 4), 140–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R., Crapo, R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Enright, P., van Der Grinten, C. P., Gustafsson, P., Jensen, R., Johnson, D. C., Macintyre, N., Mckay, R., Navajas, D., Pedersen, O. F., Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., & Wanger, J. (2005a). General considerations for lung function testing. European Respiratory Journal, 26, 153–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van Der Grinten, C. P., Gustafsson, P., Jensen, R., Johnson, D. C., Macintyre, N., Mckay, R., Navajas, D., Pedersen, O. F., Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., & Wanger, J. (2005b). Standardisation of spirometry. European Respiratory Journal, 26, 319–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., Brusasco, V., Crapo, R. O., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., van Der Grinten, C. P., Gustafsson, P., Hankinson, J., Jensen, R., Johnson, D. C., Macintyre, N., Mckay, R., Miller, M. R., Navajas, D., Pedersen, O. F., & Wanger, J. (2005). Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. European Respiratory Journal, 26, 948–968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quanjer, P. H. (1983). Standardized lung function testing. Report working party. Bulletin Européen de Physiopathologie Respiratoire, 19(Suppl 5), 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quanjer, P. H., Tammeling, G. J., Cotes, J. E., Pedersen, O. F., Peslin, R., & Yernault, J. C. (1993). Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party standardization of lung function tests, European community for steel and coal. Official statement of the European respiratory society. The European Respiratory Journal. Supplement, 16, 5–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. R., Enright, P. L., & Sherrill, D. L. (1995). Lung function development in young adults: Is there a plateau phase? European Respiratory Journal, 8, 768–772.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roca, J., Sanchis, J., Agusti-Vidal, A., Segarra, F., Navajas, D., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., Casan, P., & Sans, S. (1986). Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population. Bulletin Européen de Physiopathologie Respiratoire, 22, 217–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, D. L., Camilli, A., & Lebowitz, M. D. (1989). On the temporal relationships between lung function and somatic growth. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 140, 638–644.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, D. L., Lebowitz, M. D., Knudson, R. J., & Burrows, B. (1992). Continuous longitudinal regression equations for pulmonary function measures. European Respiratory Journal, 5, 452–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanojevic, S., Wade, A., Hankinson, J. L., Coates, A. L., Stocks, J., & Cole, T. J. (2007). Continuous reference ranges for spirometry from childhood to adulthood. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 176, A606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanojevic, S., Wade, A., Stocks, J., Hankinson, J., Coates, A. L., Pan, H., Rosenthal, M., Corey, M., Lebecque, P., & Cole, T. J. (2008). Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages: A new approach. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 177, 253–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Pelt, W., Borsboom, G. J., Rijcken, B., Schouten, J. P., van Zomeren, B. C., & Quanjer, P. H. (1994). Discrepancies between longitudinal and cross-sectional change in ventilatory function in 12 years of follow-up. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 149, 1218–1226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wanger, J., Clausen, J. L., Coates, A., Pedersen, O. F., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Crapo, R., Enright, P., Van Der Grinten, C. P., Gustafsson, P., Hankinson, J., Jensen, R., Johnson, D., Macintyre, N., Mckay, R., Miller, M. R., Navajas, D., Pellegrino, R., & Viegi, G. (2005). Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. European Respiratory Journal, 26, 511–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zapletal, A., Samannek, M., & Paul, T. (Eds.). (1987). Lung function in children and adolescents: Methods, reference values (progress in respiratory research). Basel: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts of interest were declared in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Marek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marek, E. et al. (2013). Lung Function at Age 18–25 Years: A Comparison of Different Reference Value Systems. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 755. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4546-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics