Skip to main content

Conceptualizing Family Well-Being

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family Well-Being

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 49))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on family well-being as a goal of family policy. Family policy is defined as all actions of governments that affect families, directly or indirectly, explicitly or implicitly, intentionally or not. Three frameworks are presented together with their underlying assumptions and concepts for assessing the extent to which such policies meet the family well-being criterion: family systems theory, exchange and choice theories, and family stress theory. The application of such frameworks allows for a more holistic and contextual approach to the conceptualization of family well-being and the implications of policies that governments enact that affect families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American live: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth-Anderson, P., Burton, L., & Johnson, L. (1993). Reframing theories for understanding race, ethnicity, and families. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 627–646). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, C. (1976). The impact of changing values on the family. Social Casework, 57, 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1972). Organizations: Structure and process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A. R., Rodgers, W. L., & Woodworth, J. (1982). Subjective well-being among different age groups. Ann Arbor: Mi. University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1958). Generic features of families under stress. Social Casework, 49, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1971). Modern systems theory and the family: A confrontation. Social Science Information, 10, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. (1978). Family policy: Families and government in fourteen countries. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, D., & Lahr, W. (1975). Inside the family. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koos, E. L. (1946). Families in trouble. New York: Kings Crown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The bear and the barber. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 93, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal and formal networks. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, M. (2010, December 29). Doubling up in recession-strained quarters. New York Times p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H., & Patterson, J. M. (1981). Systematic assessment of family stress resources and coping: Tools for research, education, and clinical intervention. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mydans, S. (1994, June 21). Laotians’ arrest in killing bares a generation gap. New York Times p. A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, I. (1979). Choice, exchange, and the family. In W. Burr, R. Hill, I. Nye, & I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 1–41). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D., Sprenkle, D., & Russell, C. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical application. Family Process, 18, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, K. (2011, February 13). Priceless (but with a cost). Star Tribune, p. O p1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, K., & Bubolz, M. (1983). Perceptual indicators of family life quality. Social Indicators Research, 12(4), 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, K., Danes, S., & Bauer, J. (1991). Family life quality: Theory and assessment in economically stressed families. Social Indicators Research, 24, 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2010, March 22). Facing a financial pinch, and moving in with mom and dad. New York Times, p. A21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabetelli, R., & Shehan, C. (1993). Exchange and resource theories. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 385–411). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1980). Description as choice. Oxford Economic Papers, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency, and freedom. The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terreberry, S. (1972). The evolution of organizational environments. In K. Azumi & J. Hage (Eds.), Organizational systems (pp. 75–91). Lexington: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C., & Abbott, P. (2012). Social quality, the quality of life and families in Europe. In A. Moreno (Ed.), Family well-being: European perspectives. New York: Springer (In process).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westendorp, K. (1994, April 30). Aaron needs family, not this cruel policy. Star Tribune, p. 21A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, S. L. (1988). Understanding family policy: Theoretical approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, S. L. (1995). Understanding family policy: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, S. L. (2001). Family policy: Constructed solutions to family problems. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirley L. Zimmerman Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimmerman, S.L. (2013). Conceptualizing Family Well-Being. In: Moreno Minguez, A. (eds) Family Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4354-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics