Abstract
Catastrophe models that combine data on past occurrences with future simulations of the hazard, exposure and vulnerability, and that take account of the dynamic environment as well as correlated loss distributions, are becoming increasingly important for assessing the risks of extreme events. This volume demonstrates innovative ways for adapting catastrophe models to aid risk management policy processes via a number of wide ranging applications. These are grouped into three parts, according to whether they inform local or regional risk management policy (Part I); the management of country-wide catastrophe risk and its implication on development (Part II); and the participatory design of a national insurance program (Part III). After discussion of the rational for the proposed approaches, which integrate across multiple disciplines and take into account the diverse values and preferences of stakeholders, this chapter introduces Part I of the volume, including cases on the management of flash flood risk in Vienna, Austria, an earthquake insurance program for the Tuscany region in Italy, balancing stakeholder concerns in establishing flood risk management strategies in northern Vietnam, and the choice of appropriate discounting factors in the design of infrastructures under consideration of catastrophe risk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amendola A, Ermoliev Y, Ermolieva T, Gitits V, Koff G, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2000a) A systems approach to modeling catastrophic risks and insurability. Nat Hazard 21:381–393
Amendola A, Ermoliev Y, Ermolieva T (2000b) Earthquake risk management: a case study for an Italian region. In: Proceedings of the Euroconference on global change and catastrophe risk management: earthquake risks in Europe, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/july2000/
Cardenas V, Hochrainer S, Mechler R, Pflug G, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2007) Sovereign financial disaster risk management: the case of Mexico. Environ Hazard 7(1):40–53
EC (2010) Joint Research Center of the European Commission, Lisflood Model. http://floods.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lisflood-model. Last accessed May 2012
Ermoliev Y, Wets R (1988) Numerical techniques of stochastic optimization. Computational mathematics. Springer, Berlin
FEMA (2012) HAZUS, FEMA’s methodology for estimating potential losses from disasters. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/ Last accessed May 2012
Femke V, Rodriguez J, Below R, Guha-Sapir D (2010) Annual disaster statistical review 2009. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Brussels
Grossi P, Kunreuther H (2005) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, New York
Grossi P, Zoback ML (2009) Catastrophe modeling and California earthquake risk: a 20-year perspective. Special report, Risk Management Solutions (RMS), Inc.
Hochrainer S, Mechler R (2009) Assessing financial and economic vulnerability to natural hazards: bridging the gap between scientific assessment and the implementation of disaster risk management with the CatSim model. In: Patt A, Schröter D, Klein R, de la Vega-Leinert A (eds) Assessing vulnerability to global environmental change. Earthscan, London, pp 173–194
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: summary for policy makers. Special report of the IPCC. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-SPM_FINAL.pdf
Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R, Pflug G (2005) Refocusing disaster aid. Science 309:1044–1046
Mechler R, Hochrainer S, Aaheim A, Kundzewicz Z, Lugeri N, Moriondo M, Salen H, Bindi M, Banaszak I, Chorynski A, Genovese E, Kalirai H, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Lavalle C, McEvoy D, Matczak P, Radziejewski M, Rübbelke D, Schelhaas M-J, Szwed M, Wreford A (2010) A risk management approach for assessing adaptation to changing flood and drought risks in Europe. In: Hulme M, Neufeldt H (eds) Making climate change work for us: European perspectives on adaptation and mitigation strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Munich Re (2011) Topics geo. Natural catastrophes 2010: analyses, assessments, positions. Munich Reinsurance Company. http://www.munichre.com/publications/302-06735_en.pdf
Petrini V (1995) Pericolosità Sismica e Prime Valutazioni di Rischio in Toscana. CNR/IRRS, Milan
Ramsey F (1928) A mathematical theory of savings. Econ J 138:543–559
SHARE (2009) Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe. http://www.share-eu.org/ Last accessed Sept 2012
Walker G (1997) Current developments in catastrophe modelling. In: Britton NR, Oliver J (eds) Financial risks management for natural catastrophes. Griffith University, Brisbane, pp 17–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amendola, A., Ermolieva, T., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Mechler, R. (2013). Catastrophe Models for Informing Risk Management Policy: An Introduction. In: Amendola, A., Ermolieva, T., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Mechler, R. (eds) Integrated Catastrophe Risk Modeling. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2226-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2226-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2225-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2226-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)