Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter discusses central strands of the modern social contract tradition. Distinguishing between moral and political theories on the one hand and contractualist and contractarian theories on the other, it presents one example of each of the ensuing categories: Gauthier’s moral contractarianism, Buchanan’s political contractarianism, Scanlon’s moral contractualism, and Rawls’ political contractualism. In the conclusion, strengths and weaknesses of social contract theories are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    cf. [1]. However, some authors of classical contract theory, notably John Locke, build on theological premises (cf. below).

  2. 2.

    Gauthier [2] cf. in particular the last chapter.

  3. 3.

    Buchanan and Tullock [7], cf. in particular Chap. 11.

  4. 4.

    See [1], for an overview.

  5. 5.

    Cf. also [3] for a discussion.

References

  1. Cudd A (2008) Contractarianism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2008 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/contractarianism/

  2. Gauthier D (1976) Morals by agreement. Clarendon, Oxford, p 312

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Agostino F, Gaus G (2008) Contemporary approaches to the social contract. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter 2008 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/

  4. Smith A (1976) The theory of moral sentiments. Clarendon, Oxford, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scanlon TM (1999) What we owe to each other. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London, p 148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ashford E, Mulgan T (2009) Contractualism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter 2009 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/contractualism/

  7. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan JM (1975) The limits of liberty. Between anarchy and leviathan. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samuel F (2009) Original position. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2009 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/original-position/

  11. Wenar L (2008) John Rawls. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2008 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/rawls/

  12. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rawls J (2001) Justice as fairness: a restatement, Kelly E (ed) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Herzog .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Herzog, L. (2013). The Modern Social Contract Tradition. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics