Skip to main content

Self-Report Measures of Crime and Delinquency

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

Synonyms

Crime-related self-report inventory; Self-reporting criminal offenses

Definition

Self-report measures ask respondents to report their own behaviors, beliefs/attitudes, symptoms, and personality characteristics in an interview, survey, questionnaire, or poll. Question formats can be open-ended, fixed, or hybrid and include Likert scales, true-false, and fixed choice questions, which are often used to measure demographic information and latent theoretical constructs, e.g., self-control, delinquency, peers, amenability to treatment, subjective well-being, self-esteem, and quality of life in a variety of domains. Self-report methodologies can be categorized under three general domains: theory guided, factor analytic, and criterion key. Specifically, self-report inventories used to measure crime and delinquency are concerned with reliably and accurately recording a respondent’s delinquent and criminal behavior, as well as attitudes toward these behaviors.

Description

Before...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1964). Socio-economic status and delinquent behavior: A retest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilino, W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilino, W. S., & LoSciuto, L. A. (1990). Effects of interview mode on self-reported drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. P., & Wenninger, E. P. (1962). Socio-economic class and area as correlates of illegal behavior among juveniles. American Sociological Review, 27, 826–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentler, R. A., & Monroe, L. J. (1961). Social correlates of early adolescent theft. American Sociological Review, 26, 733–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. L., & Empey, L. T. (1963). Court records, undetected delinquency, and decision-making. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 54, 456–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. (1970). Delinquent behavior in an American city. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkley, CA:University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B. (1972). Toward a general theory of psychosocial deviance: The case of aggressive behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 6, 593–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Gibson, C. L., & Baldwin, J. M. (2010). The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 509–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1974). Self-reported delinquency: A comparison of structured interviews and self-administered checklists. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 65, 545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. L. (1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 76, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, M. G., Weiler, B. L., & Widom, C. S. (2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., Short, J. F., & Olson, V. J. (1958). Socioeconomic status and delinquent behavior. In F. I. Nye (Ed.), Family relationships and delinquent behavior (pp. 23–33). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2002). The validity of a self-report delinquency scale: Comparison across gender, age, race. Sociological Methods & Research, 30, 492–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, A. L. (1941). Creative factors in scientific research. Durham, UK: Seeman Printery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, A. L. (1943). Delinquency and its outcome in court and college. The American Journal of Sociology, 49, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, T. (1931). The basis of a crime index. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 22, 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F. (1957). Differential association and delinquency. Social Problems, 4, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1934). Principles of criminology (2nd ed.). Chicago: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P. (1989). Panel effects and the use of self-reported measures of delinquency in longitudinal studies. In M. Klein (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 347–369). Los Angeles: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Farnworth, M. (1982). Social correlates of criminal involvement: Further evidence on the relationship between social status and criminal behavior. American Sociological Review, 47, 505–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee, R. Crutchfield, S. Mastrofski, L. Mazerolle, & D. McDowall (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 4): Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 33–83). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection, mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C., Lessler, J., & Devore, J. (1992). Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C. Turner, J. Lessler, & J. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies (pp. 177–219). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Gold, M. (1972). From delinquent behavior to official delinquency. Social Problems, 20(2), 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Marie Baldwin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Baldwin, J.M., Krohn, M.D., Gibson, C.L. (2014). Self-Report Measures of Crime and Delinquency. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4077

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4077

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics