Skip to main content

Environmental Flows: The Savannah Process

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

Abstract

Because The Nature Conservancy’s approach to site-specific environmental flow assessment and implementation was first described for the Savannah River in Georgia, USA, it has acquired the nickname "the Savannah Process.” Like the DRIFT method and the Building Block Methodology (BBM), the Savannah Process addresses the linkages between diverse flow characteristics and ecosystem components. This holistic method relies on facilitated expert consensus to prescribe environmental flows. The process consists of five steps. Step 1 is a one-day orientation meeting to inform and engage interested scientists, water managers, government agencies, and other stakeholders and provide a forum to express their values and concerns for the river. Step 2 is the preparation of a literature review and summary report describing existing data and knowledge of the river-floodplain-estuary system, species, and their flow dependencies to describe the annual and inter-annual flow or inundation patterns needed to support ecosystem health. Step 3 is a facilitated expert workshop, typically about two days, with participants representing expertise in all riverine ecosystem components. During this step, scientists are tasked with developing a set of environmental flow components (EFCs), which can be discussed by workshop participants in breakout groups. The whole group then reconvenes for a final review and agreement upon a unified environmental flow prescription. Step 4 is the initial implementation of the flow prescription. Following the flow workshop, scientists continue a dialogue with water managers to identify opportunities for implementing portions of the recommendations. Step 5 consists of additional data collection and research as needed to refine the environmental flow prescription. To date, the Savannah Process has been applied in a range of contexts around the world, mostly to guide changes in existing reservoir operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Higgins JV, Konrad CP, Warner AT, Hickey JT. A framework for monitoring, reporting and managing dam operations for environmental flows. Version 1.0. Sustainable Rivers Project measures working group. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • King J, Brown C, Sabet H. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Res Appl. 2003;19:619–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Louw D. Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 1998;1:109–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad C. Monitoring and evaluation of environmental flow prescriptions for five demonstration sites of the Sustainable Rivers Project. In: USGS Open-File Report 2010-1065. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey; 2010. p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Res Appl. 2006;22:297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner AT, Bach LB, Hickey JT. Restoring environmental flows through adaptive reservoir management: planning, science, and implementation through the Sustainable Rivers Project. Hydrol Sci J. 2014;59(3–4):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew T. Warner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Warner, A.T. (2018). Environmental Flows: The Savannah Process. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_342

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics