Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 4))

Abstract

The 2008 election of Barack Obama, the nation‘s first non-white president, brought forth a barrage of attempts to identify the root causes of the election. Were we moving into a―post-racial phase of American race relationships? Or was this a demographic phenomenon, driven by the infusion of new, largely young voters who were more racially and ethnically diverse than voting populations had been in the past. One indicator that this was a by-product of demographic changes was the fact that while Obama had won handedly, he had done so with only 55 % of the White vote. Indeed, the voting population had―changed color in demographic terms, suggesting a new social significance of an increasingly diverse population. This chapter aims to bring into focus some of the core themes of the United States race/ethnic demography. Since 2000, there has been a veritable explosion of edited volumes, books, and articles that provide comprehensive overviews of race/ethnicity. Trends from the 2010 Census are likely to produce as many volumes to document the changes. This chapter aims to provide an overview of much of that work and provide a few key updates in those trends. Therefore race/ethnic demography is centered on understanding three thematic issues, the ever-changing population composition by race/ethnicity, indicators of racial inequality, the complexity of race/ethnic identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The information gathered is similar to the—long-form Census questionnaire. Unlike the—snapshot provided by the decennial census, the ACS is an on-going monthly survey that gains information from approximately two million households a year. These data are—…period estimates that average 12, 36, and 60 months of data, respectively for a 1, 3-, and 5 years periods (National Research Council 2007: 1), therefore they are more akin to averages across that time period.

  2. 2.

    Identifying these counts and distributions as averages across a time period is the preferred way of referring to the information derived from the 3 year estimates (National Research Council 2007: 62).

  3. 3.

    Hispanics are technically identified as an ethnic group that may be of any race. However, it is highly common for demographers enumerating race to include this group among other racial populations under the label of race/ethnic group.

  4. 4.

    Over 40 % of the Hispanics population reported their race as—Some Other Race in 1990 and 2000, although this figure diminishes somewhat as of the most recent estimate. The percentage of Hispanics selecting—some other race is 43 % in 1990, 42.5 % in 2000, and 37 % in 2006 to 2008 (calculation by author).

  5. 5.

    The emergence of slave codes, laws specifically applied to slaves, nullified any capacity to become citizens, in that slaves could not vote, own land, bear arms, marry, socialized with free blacks, leave their plantations without master’s permission, among other indignities. This status extended to free blacks as well, as they were categorically defined as non-citizens by lying outside of the definition of—free white persons.

  6. 6.

    For example, in 1871 Congress enacted legislation that served to destroy tribal sovereignty. This policy was later amended in 1934 by the Indian Reorganization Act, which granted the American Indian population the ability to organize for its common welfare. Later, United States government the special status of many tribes, and 61 tribes were officially terminated (Snipp 1992; Thornton 2001).

  7. 7.

    The most well-known of the private schools was the Carlisle Indian School that aimed to educate and remove all traces of cultural knowledge. Colleges, such as Dartmouth, Harvard College, and William and Mary, held charters which specified intent to educate and civilize the American Indian population (Thornton 2001).

  8. 8.

    During this brief period, an estimated 40,000 Blacks were granted 40 acres of land under General Sherman (known as “40 acres and a mule”) and several southern states included newly elected Black delegates. However, these attempts were short lived as Blacks were removed from the land by president Andrew Johnson (Feagin 2000).

  9. 9.

    Despite never being defined as non-white, as Foley (1999) outlines Mexicans have lived under—Jim Crow like circumstances, particularly within the southwestern States.

  10. 10.

    It bears noting that Asians were banned from intermarriage with laws as strict as those applied to African Americans (Moran 2001).

  11. 11.

    For example, rates of infant mortality and adult mortality are highly sensitive to the level of concentrated poverty and adjusting for the fact that African Americans more often occupy impoverished neighborhoods goes a long way to explain the Black-White gap. Other research has found consistently that perceiving racial bias, regardless of a person’s social class, corresponds to higher rates of depression, hypertension, and lower self-rated health, regardless of their socioeconomic background (Paradies 2006).

  12. 12.

    These issues refer to—categorical inequality, a concept developed by Tilly Charles (1998) as discussed in Massey (2007: 5–6).

  13. 13.

    Please see Massey et al. (2003) and Charles (2006) for examples on how this argument is applied to racial differences in education achievement or housing.

  14. 14.

    By ideologies, I refer to the same definition adopted by Bonilla-Silva et al. (2004) who define it as “…broad racial frameworks or grids that racial groups use to make sense of the world, to decide what is right or wrong, true or false, important or unimportant” (p. 556). While this provides the context and rationalization for racially discriminatory action, it is conceptually distinct from treatment.

  15. 15.

    Reclassification affected the enumeration of same-sex couples in 1990 who reported themselves as married, and persons selecting more than one race on their 1990 Census form were also reclassified as monoracial (Saperstien 2006).

  16. 16.

    The first case appears in the first U.S. Census by employing the three-fifths compromise where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person to equalize representation between the slave states of the South and the Northern territories (Nobles 2000).

  17. 17.

    Hill (2002) finds the intriguing pattern that Whites perceive less phenotype variation among African Americans than African Americans do themselves and that Whites will rate African American’s skin color as darker than an African American individual will rate their own skin.

References

  • Alba, R. (2009). Blurring the color line: The new chance for a more integrated America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J., & Fienberg, S. E. (1999). Who counts? The politics of census-taking in contemporary america. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In F. Barth (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference (pp. 9–38). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashi, V., & McDaniel, A. (1997). A theory of immigration and racial stratification. Journal of Black Studies, 27(5), 668–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F., Lee, J., Batalova, J., & Leach, M. (2005). Immigration and fading color lines in America. In R. Farley (Ed.), The American people: Census 2000 (pp. 302–331). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E. M., & Tolnay, S. E. (1990). The killing fields of the deep south: The market for cotton and the lynching of blacks 1882–1930. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 526–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, A. (1968). Black families in white America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. M., Dabady, M., & Citro, C. F. (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In N. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (pp. 262–299). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. D. (2004). Inequalities that endure? Racial ideology, American politics, and the peculiar role of social science. In M. Krysan & A. Lewis (Eds.), Changing terrain of race and ethnicity (pp. 13–42). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laissez faire racism: The crystallization of a ‘Kinder, Gentler’ anti-Black ideology. In S. A. Tuch & J. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 15–44). Greenwood: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (1996). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62, 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E., & Glover, K. S. (2004). ‘We are all Americans’: The Latin Americanization of race relations in the United States. In M. Krysan & A. E. Lewis (Eds.), The changing terrain of race and ethnicity (pp. 149–183). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E., Lewis, A., & Embrick, D. G. (2004). ‘I did not get that job because of a black man’: The story lines and testimonies of color-blind racism. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratter, J., & Gorman, B. K. (2011). Does multiracial matter? A study of racial disparities in self-rated health. Demography, 48(1), 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondolo, E., Rieppi, R., Kelly, K. P., & Gerin, W. (2003). Perceived racism and blood pressure: A review of the literature and conceptual and methodological critique. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarillo, A., & Bonilla, F. (2001). Hispanics in a multicultural society: A new American dilemma? In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (pp. 103–134). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. E., & Eggerling-Boeck, J. (2006). What about the children? The psychological and social well-being of multiracial adolescents. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(1), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. E., & Rogalin, C. (2006). Categorical imperatives: The interaction of Latino and racial identification. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2006). Won’t you be my neighbor? Race, class and residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. (2004). What we do and do not know about ‘race’, ‘ethnicity’, genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era. Nature Genetics, 36(11s), s13–s15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, S., & Hartmann, D. (2007). Ethnicity and race making identities in a changing world (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, National Research. (2007). Using the American community survey: Benefits and challenges (C. Citro & G. Kalton, Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, E. M., Hayward, M. D., & Seeman, T. E. (2004). Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and health. In N. B. Anderson, R. A. Bulatao, B. Cohen, & Panel on Race, Ethnicity, and Health in Later Life. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (Eds.), Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in later life (pp. 310–352). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M., & Emirbayer, M. (2010). Racial domination, racial progress: A sociology of race in America. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., & Kao, G. (2007). Are racial identities of multiracial stable? Changing self- identification among single and multiracial race individuals. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D. B. (2008). Black/white differences in school performance: The oppositional culture explanation. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, J., Telles, E. E., & Flashman, J. (2005). The demographic foundations of the Latino population. In N. R. Council (Ed.), Hispanics and the future of America (pp. 66–99). Washington, DC: The National Academics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duster, T. (2003). Buried alive: The concept of race in science. In A. H. Goodman, D. Heath, & M. Susan Lindee (Eds.), Genetic nature/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide (pp. 258–277). Berkeley and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, D. S., & Zinn, M. B. (1997). Social problems. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Irma, E. T. (2001). New African American life tables from 1935–1940 to 1985–1990. Demography 38(1):97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T. (2001). New African American life tables from 1935–40 to 1985–90. Demography, 38, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschbach, K. (1995). The enduring and vanishing American Indian: American Indian population growth and intermarriage in 1990. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(1), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschbach, K., Khalil Supple, C., & Snipp, M. (1998). Changes in racial identification and the educational attainment of American Indians, 1970–1990. Demography, 35(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (1992). Asian American panethnicity; bridging institutions and identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1991). The new census question about ancestry: What did it tell us? Demography, 28(3), 411–429. Abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (2004). Identifying with multiple races: A social movement that succeeded but failed? In M. Krysan & A. E. Lewis (Eds.), The changing terrain of race and ethnicity. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., & Haaga, J. (2005). The American people: Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. (2000). Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. (2006). Systemic racism, a theory of oppression. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. (2007). Theoretical perspectives in race and ethnic relations. In C. Gallagher (Ed.), Rethinking the color line: Readings in race and ethnicity (pp. 29–45). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, N. (1999). The white scourge: Mexicans, Blacks, and poor whites in Texas cotton culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2001). A reconceptualization of the role of biology in contributing to race/ethnic disparities in health outcomes. Population Research and Policy Review, 20(6), 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2007). What to make of it? The (re)emergence of a biological conceptualization of race in health disparities research. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1977–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2008). Functional or futile? The (In)utility of methodological critiques of genetic research on racial disparities in health. Social Science and Medicine, 66(8), 1670–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. (2004). Racial redistricting: Expanding the boundaries of whiteness. In H. Dalmage (Ed.), The multiracial movement: The politics of color (pp. 59–76). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1999). The possibility of a new racial hierarchy in the twenty-first century United States. In M. Lamont (Ed.), The cultural territories of race (pp. 371–390). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R., & Morning, A. J. (2002). Back in the box: The dilemma of using multiple-race data for single-race laws. In J. Perlmann & M. C. Waters (Eds.), The new race question: How the census counts multiracial individuals (pp. 119–136). New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Levy Economics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, B. K., & Read, J.’n. G. (2007). Why men die younger than women. Geriatrics and Aging, 10, 179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold del Castillo, R. (1984). La Familia: Chicano families in the urban Southwest, 1846 to the present. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold del Castillo, R. (2001). La Familia: Family cohesion among Mexican American families in the urban southwest, 1948–1900. In S. Fergueson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2010). Births: Preliminary data for 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports web release 58(16). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney Lopez, I. (1996). White by law: The legal construction of race. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R., & Sim, J. J. (2002). Who is multiracial? Assessing the complexity of lived race. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 614–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, M., Hoyert, D. L., Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., Kochanek, K. D., & Tejada-Vera, B. (2009). Deaths: Final data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(14), 1–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. E. (2000). Color differences in the socioeconomic status of African American men: Results of a longitudinal study. Social Forces, 78, 1437–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. E. (2002). Skin color and the perceptions of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference? Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., Scott Brown, J., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2006). Racial identity in adolescence: Developmental insights and social pathways. Child Development, 77(5), 1298–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., Scott Brown, J., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2007). Measuring Latinos: Racial vs. ethnic self-understandings. Social Forces, 86(2), 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, R. A. (1993). Racial differentials in infant mortality in the U.S.: An examination of social and health determinants. Social Forces, 72, 529–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, R. A. (1996). Black-white differences in health and mortality: A review and conceptual model. The Sociological Quarterly, 37, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, R. A., Biegler, M., De Turk, P. B., Forbes, D., Parker Frisbie, W., Hong, Y., & Pullum, S. G. (1999). Race/ethnicity, nativity, and infant mortality in the United States. Social Forces, 77, 1083–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociological Compass, 1, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., & Smith, A. S. (2001). Two or more races population: 2000. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1996). The socioeconomic assimilation of Caribbean American blacks. Social Forces, 74, 911–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. D. (2004, Winter). How a drug becomes ‘ethnic’: Law, commerce, and the production of racial categories in medicine. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 4, 1–46. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=515942.

  • Keith, V. M., & Herring, C. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the black community. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 760–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. M. (2007). Immigration and America’s black population. Population Bulletin, 62, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreider, R. M., & Ellis, R. (2011). Living arrangements of children: 2009 (Current Population Reports, P70-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. (2000). Discrimination and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 36–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Lewis, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Changing terrain of race & ethnicity. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. (1993). Racial classifications in the U.S. census: 1890–1990. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. (1998). Asian Americans: Diverse and growing. Population Bulletin, 53(2), 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bean, F. (2004). America’s changing color lines: Immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bean, F. D. (2007). Reinventing the color line: Immigration and America’s new racial/ethnic divide. Social Forces, 86(2), 561–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebler, C. A., & Halpern-Manners, A. (2008). A practical approach to using multiple-race response data: A bridging method for public use microdata. Demography, 45(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., & Phelan, J. (1995) Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior (Special Issue):80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, J. H. (2004). When race makes no difference: Marriage and the military. Social Forces, 83(2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, K. S., & Coreil, J. (1986). The health of Hispanics in the southwestern United States: An epidemiologic paradox. Public Health Reports, 101, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., & Midgley, E. (2003). Immigration: Shaping and reshaping America. Population Bulletin, 58, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Charles, C., Lundy, G., & Fisher, M. J. (2003). Source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, V. M., Ponce, N. A., Washington, D. L., & Cochran, S. D. (2003). Classification of race and ethnicity: Implications for public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, A. (1995). The dynamic racial composition of the United States. Daedalus, 124, 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. G. (2000). As long as they don’t move next door; segregation and racial conflict in American neighborhoods. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. (2001). Interracial intimacy: Regulating race and romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. J. (2008a). Ethnic classification in global perspective: A cross-national survey of the 2000 census round. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 239–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. J. (2008b). Reconstructing race in science and society: Biology textbooks, 1952–2002. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. D. (1999). A retrospective of the civil rights movement: Political and intellectual landmarks. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (1994). Constructing ethnicity: Creating and recreating ethnic identity and culture. Social Problems, 41(4), 152–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobles, M. (2000). Shades of citizenship: Race and the census in modern politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (1997). Recommendations from the Interagency Committee for review of the race and ethnic standards to the Office of Management and Budget Concerning changes to the standards for the classifications of federal data on race and ethnicity. Federal Register, 62(131), 36873–36946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J., & Simons, H. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(12), 155–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From 1960s to 1990s. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2009). Thinking through race and racism. Contemporary Sociology, 38(2), 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F. C., & Rogers, R. G. (2004). Socioeconomic status, smoking, and health: A test of competing theories of cumulative advantage. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradies, Y. (2006). A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported raciams and health. Ethnicity and Health, 35, 888–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrillo, V. (2003). Strangers to these shores. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D. (2008). Who is Hispanic? Shades of Ethnicity among Latino/a Youth. In C. Gallagher (Ed.), Racism in post-race America: New theories, new directions (pp. 17–35). Chapel Hill: Social Forces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the US population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmann, J., & Waters, M. C. (2002). The new race question: How the census counts multiracial individuals. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, K., & O’Hare, W. P. (1999). America’s racial and ethnic minorities. Population Bulletin, 54, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530(November), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2005). Politics and science in census taking. In R. Farley (Ed.), The American people: Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., Lichter, D. T., & Mellot, L. (2005). Out-of-wedlock childbearing, marital prospects, and mate selection. Social Forces, 82, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, K. (2002). The effects of differential undercount on survey estimates of race differences in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 774–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riche, M. F. (2000). America’s diversity and growth: Signposts for the 21st century. Population Bulletin, 55, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, S. A. (1999). Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community context. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G., Adlakha, A., & West, K. K. (2002, May 8–11). Coverage of population in census 2000: Results from demographic analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. E. (2000). Changing race; Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the united states. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. G. (1992). Living and dying in the U.S.A.: Sociodemographic determinants of death among blacks and whites. Demography, 29, 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. G., Hummer, R. A., Krueger, P. M., & Pampel, F. C. (2005). Mortality attributable to cigarette smoking in the United States. Population and Development Review, 31, 259–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J., Karafin, D., & Tester, G. (2009). The complexities and processes of racial housing discrimination. Social Problems, 56, 46–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. D. (2005). The end of the one-drop rule? Labeling of multiracial children in black intermarriages. Sociological Forum, 20(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R. (2005). Making of a people. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America (pp. 16–65). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, R. (2005). Latinos and the changing face of America. In R. Farley (Ed.), The American people: Census 2000 (pp. 352–379). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, A., Goyette, K. A., & ChangHwan Kim. (2009). Socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. (2006). Double-checking the race box: Examining inconsistency between survey measures of observed and self-reported race. Social Forces, 85(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security, United States Department of Homeland. (2009). Yearbook of immigration statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, A. (1993). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N., Wilson, W. J., & Mitchell, F. (2001). America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snipp, C. M. (1992). Sociological perspectives on American Indians. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snipp, C. M. (2003). Racial measurement in the American census: Past practices and implications for the future. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. (1974). All our Kin. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, M. (2004). African Americans and the color line. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarkasa, N. (2001). Interpreting the African heritage in Afro-American family organization. In S. Fergueson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 77–90). Mounainview: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafoya, S. M., Johnson, H., & Hill, L. E. (2004). Who chooses to choose two? In The American people: Census 2000 population reference bureau report (pp. 1–20). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takai, R. (1989). Strangers from a different shore: A history of Asian Americans. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E. E., & Lim, N. (1999, November). Does it matter who answers the race question? Racial classification and income inequality in Brazil. Demography 35(4), 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E. E., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of exclusion. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, R., & Stockridge, N. L. (2007). BiDil for heart failure in black patients: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(1), 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, S., (author), & Thernstrom, A. (1999). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R. (1984). Cherokee population losses during the trail of tears: A new perspective and a new estimate. Ethnohistory, 31, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R. (1987). American Indian holocaust and survival. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R. (2001). Trends among American Indians in the United States. In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and future consequences (pp. 135–169). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1998). How to hoard opportunities. In C. Tilly (Ed.), Durable inequality (pp. 147–169). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1995). The decline in marriage among African Americans causes, consequences, and policy implications. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993, 2003). Census 1990 Summary File 3—United States. Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). Census 2000 Summary File 3—United States. Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, D. F., & Hayward, M. D. (2006). Early-life origins of the race gap in men’s mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. C. (1999). Black identities: West Indian immigrant dreams and American realities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, D. (1992). The Mexican frontier. Alburquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliams, K. (2006). Mark one or more: Civil rights in multiracial America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (1995). US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: Patterns and explanations. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 349–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Neighbors, H. (2001). Racism, discrimination, and hypertension: Evidence and needed research. Ethnicity and Disease, 11, 800–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Williams-Morris, R. (2000). Racism and mental health: The African American experience. Ethnicity and Health, 5(3/4), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Race/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Yan Yu, Jackson, J. S., & Anderson, N. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winant, H. (2000). Race and race theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winant, H. (2001). The world is a ghetto; race and democracy since world war II. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, M. (2006). Not quite white: White trash and the boundaries of whiteness. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L. (2008). Cohorts estimate of non-marital fertility for U.S. women. Demography, 45(1), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Goyette, K. (2005). A demographic portrait of Asian Americans. In R. Farley (Ed.), The American people: Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, G. (2003). Who is white? Latinos, Asians, and the new black/nonblack divide. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaukey, D., Anderton, D., & Lundqust, J. H. (2007). Demography: The study of human population (3rd ed.). Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, T. (2001). Thicker than blood: An essay on how racial statistics lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenifer L. Bratter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bratter, J.L. (2015). The Demography of Race and Ethnicity in the United States. In: Sáenz, R., Embrick, D., Rodríguez, N. (eds) The International Handbook of the Demography of Race and Ethnicity. International Handbooks of Population, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8891-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics