Abstract
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, or TPACK (pronounced t-pack), is a theoretical framework to examine how a specific technology creates meaningful opportunities for teaching and learning. For 3 years we engaged three cohorts of teachers in a sustained professional development project entitled GIT Ahead. GIT Ahead helped teachers identify ways to teach science using geospatial technologies. This chapter presents a case study of one GIT Ahead teacher’s use of Google Earth and ArcView software to teach students about watershed concepts and issues. TPACK provides a framework for analysis of both the types of teacher knowledge required to successfully implement technology-based science learning and the pedagogical choices necessary to achieve intended learning outcomes. In the watershed case study, Google Earth enabled students to explore a 3D representation of their local watershed, change their view or perspective as needed, and access supplementary information that helped them to interpret the landscape. Using ArcView they measured various attributes of the watershed, which required them to understand individual scientific concepts and the interrelatedness of those concepts. Ultimately, TPACK provides researchers with a knowledge framework for research on the use of geospatial technology to teach science. A productive area of future research might examine how content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and technological knowledge vary among teachers using similar technologies or teaching similar concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Audet, R. H., & Ludwig, G. (2000). GIS in schools. Redlands: ESRI Press.
Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 349–390.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K., & Duffy, T. (1998). Grounded constructions and how technology can help. Technology Trends,43(2), 15–23.
Barab, S. A., Squire, K., & Dueber, B. (2000). Supporting authenticity through participatory learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37–62.
Barab, S. L., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
Barnett, M., MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Vaughn, M. H., & Mark, S. (2013). Geospatial technologies: The present and future roles of emerging technologies in environmental education. In B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.
Bodzin, A. M. (2008). Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 47–57.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.
Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.
English, K., & Feaster, L. S. (2003). Community geography: GIS in action. Redlands: ESRI Press.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–17). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Hall-Wallace, M. K., & McAuliffe, C. M. (2002). Design, implementation, and evaluation of GIS-based learning materials in an introductory geoscience course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(1), 5–14.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Loughran, J. J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J. R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71–98.
MaKinster, J. G., Barab, S. A., Harwood, W. S., & Andersen, H. O. (2006). The effect of social context on the reflective practice of pre-service science teachers: Incorporating a web-supported community of teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 543–579.
Malone, L., Palmer, A., & Voigt, C. (2005). Mapping our world: GIS lessons for educators. Redlands: ESRI Press.
Milson, A., & Alibrandi, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital geography: Geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Morgan, C., MaKinster, J., & Trautmann, N. M. (2009). Learning secondary science using geospatial technology: Understanding student experiences and perceptions. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, April 17–21, 2009.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Squire, K., MaKinster, J., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. A. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468–489.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Trautmann, N., & MaKinster, J. (2010). Flexibly adaptive professional development in support of teaching science with geospatial technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(3), 351–370.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.
Veal, W. R., & Kubasko, D. S. (2003). Domain specific pedagogical content knowledge of evolution held by biology and geology teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(4), 334–352.
Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4), (Online). Available from www.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html. (3, 4, June).
Vernier. (2009). LabQuest. Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.vernier.com/products/interfaces/labq/
Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.
Acknowledgments 
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under DUE Grant No 0602751. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N. (2014). Understanding the Use of Geospatial Technologies to Teach Science: TPACK as a Lens for Effective Teaching. In: MaKinster, J., Trautmann, N., Barnett, M. (eds) Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3931-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3930-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3931-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)