Skip to main content

CT Evaluation of Chest Pain: Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Aortic Syndrome

  • Chapter
Diseases of the Chest and Heart 2015–2018

Abstract

Chest pain is a common presenting symptom among patients visiting emergency departments (EDs) in the US and is responsible for over 5.5 million visits annually second only to abdominal pain [1]. However, the number of patients ultimately diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), either ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or a non-ST elevation MI, is <20% [2]. The prevalence of acute aortic chest pain is one to two orders of magnitude less than chest pain due to ACS [3]. For every 130 patients with ACS, there is only one patient with an aortic cause of chest pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC et al (1987) Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 60:219–224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swap CJ, Nagurney JT (2005) Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Jama 294:2623–2629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF et al (2013) Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation 127:2031–2037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Limkakeng A, Jr., Gibier WB, Pollack C et al (2001) Combination of goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin i for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification. Acad Emerg Med 8:696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman J, Fromm R, Meyer D et al (1999) Diagnostic marker cooperative study for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Circulation 99:1671–1677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Fody EP et al (2002) The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 40:584–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedges JR, Young GP, Henkel GF et al (1992) Serial ECGs are less accurate than serial CK-MB results for emergency department diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 21:1445–1450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL et al (1998) Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 129:845–855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollander JE, Sease KL, Sparano DM et al (2004) Effects of neural network feedback to physicians on admit/discharge decision for emergency department patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 44:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCaig LF, Burt CW (2004) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2002 emergency department summary. Adv Data 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCaig LF, Nawar EW (2006) National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS (2002) Exercise echocardiography or exercise spect imaging? A metaanalysis of diagnostic test performance. J Nucl Cardiol 9:133–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH et al (2003) ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging). Circulation 108:1404–1418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP et al (2003) ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE committee to update the 1997 guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography). Circulation 108:1146–1162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zalenski RJ, Rydman RJ, Ting S et al (1998) A national survey of emergency department chest pain centers in the United States. Am J Cardiol 81:1305–1309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burt CW (1999) Summary statistics for acute cardiac ischemia and chest pain visits to United States eds, 1995–1996. Am J Emerg Med 17:552–559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee TH, Goldman L (2000) Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 342:1187–1195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tosteson AN, Goldman L, Udvarhelyi IS, Lee TH (1996) Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain. Circulation 94:143–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conti A, Paladini B, Magazzini S et al (2002) Chest pain unit management of patients at low and not low-risk for coronary artery disease in the emergency department. A 5-year experience in the Florence area. Eur J Emerg Med 9:31–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Solinas L, Raucci R, Terrazzino S et al (2003) Prevalence, clinical characteristics, resource utilization and outcome of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. A multicenter, prospective, observational study in north-eastern Italy. Ital Heart J 4:318–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D et al (2002) Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 222:271–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al (2002) ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina). Circulation 106:1893–1900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luepker RV, Apple FS, Christenson RH et al (2003) Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; The European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute. Circulation 108:2543–2549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ornato JP (2003) Management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: update ACC/AHA guidelines. Am J Emerg Med 21:346–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vilacosta I, Roman JAS (2001) Acute aortic syndrome. Heart 85:365–368.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C et al (2001) Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J 22:1642–1681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH et al (2005) Acute intramural ematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution. Circulation 111:1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 121:e266–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Erbel RV, Aboyans V, Boileau C et al (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 35:2873–2926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang L, Zhou T, Zhang R et al (2014) Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease. European Radiology 24:2345–2352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP et al (2011) Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1237–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuchs TA, Stehli J, Bull S et al (2014) Coronary computed tomography angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest x-ray examination. Eur Heart J 35:1131–1136.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 166:1350–1356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers IS, Banerji D, Siegel EL et al (2011) Usefulness of comprehensive cardiothoracic computed tomography in the evaluation of acute undifferentiated chest discomfort in the emergency department (capture). Am J Cardiol 107:643–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Cury RC et al (2014) SCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomog 8:254–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA et al; Investigators R-I (2012) Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 367:299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B et al (2012) CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 366:1393–1403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A et al; Investigators C-S (2011) The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1414–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Svensson LG, Labib SB, Eisenhauer AC, Butterly JR (1999) Intimai tear without hematoma: an important variant of aortic dissection that can elude current imaging techniques. Circulation 99:1331–1336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams DM, Cronin P, Dasika N et al (2006) Aortic branch artery pseudoaneurysms accompanying aortic dissection. Part I. Pseudoaneurysm anatomy. J Vasc Interven Radiol JVIR 17:765–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nathan DP, Boonn W, Lai E et al (2012) Presentation, complications, and natural history of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer disease. J Vasc Surg 55:10–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johansson G, Markstrom U, Swedenborg J (1995) Ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms: a study of incidence and mortality rates. J Vasc Surg 21:985–988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleischmann, D., Hoffmann, U. (2015). CT Evaluation of Chest Pain: Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Aortic Syndrome. In: Hodler, J., von Schulthess, G.K., Kubik-Huch, R.A., Zollikofer, C.L. (eds) Diseases of the Chest and Heart 2015–2018. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5752-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5752-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5751-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5752-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics