Abstract
MR imaging of the prostate emerged as a new diagnostic tool for the study of prostate cancer in the mid-1980s. Ever since new MR techniques have evolved making MR prostate imaging a promising modality for detecting and staging of the prostate tumors. Basic morphologic sequences (T1-weighted (T1W)and T2-weighted (T2W)) in combination with recent advances which include functional and physiologic MR imaging techniques allow a more sophisticated approach of the prostate cancer, adding new information beyond the traditional morphologic assessment. In addition, the quality of the performed MRI exams of the prostate is essentially improved using new imaging unit hardware and software. Another era of advance is the development of MR-compatible devices, allowing invasive procedures as targeted prostate biopsy to be performed. Despite the undoubtful advance there are a lot of challenges to confront with in MR imaging. Technical issues have to be solved in order to overcome inherent limitations of functional sequences (artifacts, low spatial and temporal resolution, complicated post processing software, and lack of standardization). Variable biological signatures of prostate cancer require a deeply sophisticated approach taking into account MR imaging together with other biomarker and clinical data so that the best treatment choice will be done for a given clinical situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y et al (2010) Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer form benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 217:715–723
Sadha V, Baris T, Naira M et al (2012) Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR 198:1277–1288
Woodfield C, Tung G, Grand D et al (2010) Diffusion weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. AJR 194:316–322
Jung JA, Coakley FV, Vigneron PB et al (2004) Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology 233:701–708
Young Jun C, Jeong Kon K, Namkug K et al (2007) Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer. Radiology 27:63–75
Heesakkers RA, Hövels AM, Jager GJ et al (2008) MRI with a lymph-node-specific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph-node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol 9(9):850–856
Yacob H Jo, Sad Verma, Moultan S Jo et al (2012) Imaging guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques. Radiographics 32:819–837
De Visscherc P, De Meerleer G, Fütterer J, Villeirs G (2010) Role of MRI in follow-up after local therapy for prostate carcinoma. AJR 194:1427–1433
Ho Barentsa, Richenberq J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–747
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kritikos, N.V. (2014). MRI in Prostate Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5385-4_91
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5385-4_91
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5384-7
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5385-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)