Skip to main content
  • 1307 Accesses

Abstract

As extensively discussed in previous chapters, MRI currently represents the imaging modality of choice to assess fistula tract topography and the possible presence of abscess collections, since it can identify active sepsis despite the absence of an external opening [1, 2]. However, to date, no studies have been published concerning the learning curve and the importance of the reader’s experience in interpreting perianal MRI findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Szurowska E, Wypych J, Izycka-Swieszewska E (2007) Perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: MRI diagnosis and surgical planning: MRI in fistulazing perianal Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 32:705–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maccioni F, Colaiacomo MC, Stasolla A, et al. (2002) Value of MRI performed with phasedarray coil in the diagnosis and pre-operative classification of perianal and anal fistulas. Radiol Med 104:58–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horsthuis K, Stoker J (2004) MRI of perianal Crohn’s disease. Am J Roent 183:1309–1315

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, et al. (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218:75–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hussain SM, Outwater EK, Joekes EC, et al. (2000) Clinical and MR imaging features of cryp- toglandular and Crohn’s fistulas and abscesses. Abdom Imaging 25:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, et al. (2003) Response of fistulating Crohn’s disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98:332–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Tonolini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonolini, M. (2013). Artifacts and Pitfalls. In: Tonolini, M., Maconi, G. (eds) Imaging of Perianal Inflammatory Diseases. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2847-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2847-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2846-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2847-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics