Skip to main content

The Past and Future of Inflation Targeting: Implications for Emerging-Market and Developing Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monetary Policy in India

Abstract

Inflation targeting (IT) was started in 1990 and spread subsequently to 35 other advanced and emerging/developing countries until now. Drawing from existing and new research, this paper takes stock of IT’s past performance and limitations, and discusses its main challenges to remain the monetary regime of choice in the future. Adopting and developing IT takes different forms but central bank gradually converge to a common policy framework—although the framework itself continues evolving over time. There is significant evidence on the success of IT—in particular for emerging economies and lower income countries—in improving central bank’ institutional set-up, conduct of monetary policy, and macroeconomic performance. The last decade presented the greatest challenges to IT, due to the commodity price shock of 2006–2007 and then the Global Financial Crisis and its aftermath. The future of IT in general, and in developing countries in particular, will be determined by how well central bank manage the transition toward full-fledged stationary target IT; improve their independence, transparency, and accountability; strengthen flexible IT without giving up low inflation as the key policy mandate; and evaluate seriously adoption of price-level targeting. Continuing IT adoption in developing countries, including India recently, is an encouraging sign of their capacity to face these challenges.

We thank Ken Kletzer for very useful comments on a first draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We follow the IMF regarding both the classification of economies into AEs and EMDEs, and the IT country list (IMF 2015).

  2. 2.

    The foundation of flexible IT is illustrated best by legal acts related to IT in New Zealand. The assigned policy objective for the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) was established in clause 8 of the RBNZ Act of December 1989: “The primary function of the Bank is to formulate and implement monetary policy directed to the economic objective of achieving and maintaining stability in the general level of prices.” The flexible part of IT is reflected a decade later by the 1999 Policy Target Agreement between the Government of New Zealand and the RBNZ: “In pursuing its price stability objective, the Bank shall implement monetary policy in a sustainable, consistent and transparent manner and shall seek to avoid unnecessary instability in output, interest rates and the exchange rate” (Grimes 2013; Walsh 2015).

  3. 3.

    The variables in each category are: (i) for institutional independence: full legal independence, goal independence, and operational independence; (ii) for well-developed central bank infrastructure: technical infrastructure, data availability, and systematic inflation forecasting and modeling capabilities; (iii) for developed economic structure: full price deregulation, no excess sensitivity of inflation to commodity prices and the exchange rate, low dollarization, and low trade openness; (iv) healthy financial system: six measures of banking and capital market development.

  4. 4.

    This paper expands the existing literature in five ways: allowing for a broader specification that encompasses a wide set of potential determinants of the likelihood of IT; using a large dataset for a treatment group comprised by all IT countries and a large control group of non-IT countries, with three decades of annual data; for robustness checks, applying different panel-data estimation techniques for discrete-choice dependent variables, comprising pooled data estimators for logit and probit models, the conditional logit estimator for fixed effects, and logit and probit estimators for random effects; conducting robustness checks of the preferred specification by testing its validity for different country and time sub-samples; and subjecting the preferred specification to alternative measures of our treatment group, varying IT starting dates.

  5. 5.

    Dincer and Eichengreen (2014) present a wealth of data on central bank independence and transparency, for 120 central bank until 2010, and report regression results to relate fundamentals to the two latter measures, as well as their impact on inflation and inflation volatility. However, they do not report descriptive or empirical results for central bank by different monetary regimes, like IT.

  6. 6.

    Further studies include Wu (2004), who finds that IT significantly reduces inflation in a cross-section of 22 AEs. However, Willard (2006), using the same dataset as Wu, but different methods, finds only small and non-significant effects for AEs. Other studies, focusing only on EMDEs, find that the introduction of IT has reduced inflation rates, including Goncalves and Salles (2008), Biondi and Toneto (2008), Brito and Bystedt (2010), and Yamada (2013).

  7. 7.

    This conclusion on the effect of IT on output volatility is in contrast to Svensson’s (2010) earlier review of the literature, where he reports that IT has reduced output volatility in both AEs and EMDEs.

  8. 8.

    Ehrmann’s panel of 10 advanced countries/regions includes three important economies that are not conventionally classified as ITers (and therefore are also excluded from our set of 36 IT countries): the Euro Zone, Switzerland, and the U.S. It is likely that these three economies suffer more from persistently weak inflation than the other 7 IT countries. Therefore it is possible that the author’s reported better anchoring of expectations in IT countries is under-estimated.

  9. 9.

    The authors also report that fiscal outcomes (deficit and debt levels) were stronger for both AE and EMDE ITers, compared to NITers, during the 2007–2012 period.

  10. 10.

    Walsh (2009) reports counter-factual simulation results for the stabilizing effects of PLT on U.S. inflation expectations, if the Federal Reserve had implemented a PLT regime since the start of the Great Financial Crisis.

References

  • Albagli, E., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2008). By how much and why do inflation targeters miss their targets? Central Bank of Chile manuscript, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., & Sheridan, N. (2005). Does inflation targeting matter? In B. Bernanke & M. Woodford (Eds.), The inflation targeting debate. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batini, N., & Laxton, D. (2007). Under what conditions can inflation targeting be adopted? The experience of emerging markets. In F. Mishkin, N. Loayza & K. Schmidt-Hebbel (Eds.), Monetary policy under inflation targeting. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, R., & Toneto, R. (2008). Regime de Metas Inflacionárias: O Impacto sobre o Desempenho Economico dos Paises. Revista Estudos Economicos, 38, 873–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich, D., Fendel, R., & Rülke, J. C. (2012). Inflation targeting makes the difference: Novel evidence on inflation stabilization. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(5), 1092–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (2000). Central-Bank credibility: Why do we care? How do we build it? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1421–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R., & Bystedt, B. (2010). Inflation targeting in emerging economies: Panel evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 91, 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón, C., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2008). What determines adoption of inflation targeting? Manuscript, Central Bank of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderón, C., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2010). What drives inflation in the world? In R. Fry, C. Jones & C. Kent (Eds.), Inflation in an era of relative price shocks. Reserve Bank of Australia and Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis of The Australia National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capistran, C., & Ramos-Francia, M. (2010). Does inflation targeting affect the dispersion of inflation expectations? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(1), 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carare, A., & Stone, M. (2006). Inflation targeting regimes. European Economic Review, 50(5), 1297–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho-Filho, I. (2010). Inflation targeting and the crisis: An empirical assessment. IMF Working Papers 10/45. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelnuovo, E., Nicoletti-Altimari, S., & Rodriguez-Palenzuela, D. (2003). Definition of price stability, range and point inflation targets: The anchoring of long term inflation expectation. In O. Issing (Ed.), Background studies for the ECB’s evaluation of its monetary policy strategy. European Central Bank: Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. G., Flores-Lagunes, A., & Krause, S. (2006). Has monetary policy become more efficient? A cross-country analysis. The Economic Journal, 116(511), 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. G., & Hakkio, C. (2010). Inflation targeting and private sector forecasts. In D. Cobham, O. Eitrheim, S. Gerlach, & J. F. Qvigstad (Eds.), Twenty years of inflation targeting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. G., & Ehrmann, M. (1999). Does inflation targeting increase output volatility? An international comparison of policymakers’ preferences and outcomes. NBER Working Papers 7426. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., Kiguel, M., & Liviatan, N. (1992). How much to commit to an exchange rate rule: Balancing credibility and flexibility. Working Paper Policy Research Series 931. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. S. (2014). Inflation targeting and the anchoring of inflation expectations: Cross-country evidence from consensus forecasts. Working Paper 174. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demertzis, M., Massimiliano, M., & Viegi, N. (2009). Anchors for inflation expectations. DNB Working Papers 229. Netherlands Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, N., & Eichengreen, B. (2014). Central Bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measures. International Journal of Central Banking, 10(1), 189–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann, M. (2015). Targeting inflation from below: How do inflation expectations behave? International Journal of Central Banking, 11(4), 213–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijffinger, S., & Geraats, P. (2006). How transparent are Central bank? European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, M. D., Julius, L. L., Mahadeva, S., Roger, G., & Sterne, (2000). Key issues in the choice of monetary policy framework. In L. Mahadeva & G. Sterne (Eds.), Monetary policy frameworks in a global context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry-McKibbin, R. A., & Wang, C. (2014). Does inflation targeting outperform alternative policies during global downturns? CAMA Working Paper 64/2014, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemayel, E. R., Jahan, S., & Peter, A. (2011). What can Low-Income Countries expect from adopting Inflation Targeting? IMF Working Paper WP/11/276, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraats, P. (2009). Trends in monetary policy transparency. International Finance, 12(2), 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, S., & Schnabel, G. (2000). The Taylor rule and interest rates in the EMU area. Economics Letters, 67(2), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillitzer, C., & Simon, J. (2015). Inflation targeting: A victim of its own success. International Journal of Central Banking, 11(4), 259–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves, C., & Salles, J. (2008). Inflation targeting in emerging economies: What do the data say? Journal of Development Economics, 85, 312–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürkaynak, R., Levin, A., & Swanson, E. (2010). Does inflation targeting anchor long-run inflation expectations? Evidence from the U.S., UK, and Sweden. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(6), 1208–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermeier, K., Ötker-Robe, I., Jacome, L., Giustiniani, A., Ishi, K., Vavra, D., et al. (2009). Inflation pressures and monetary policy options in emerging and developing countries: A cross regional perspective. IMF Working Paper 09/01. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, G. (2012). State of the Art of inflation targeting. Centre for Central Banking Studies, Handbook N° 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. (2006). The choice of inflation targeting—An empirical investigation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 3(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015). Annual report on exchange arrangements and exchange restrictions. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jácome, L., & Vázquez, F. (2008). Is there any link between legal Central Bank independence and inflation? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(4), 788–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2002). The effect of inflation targeting on the behavior of expected inflation: Evidence from an 11 country panel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(8), 1493–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamber, G., Karagedikli, I., & Smith, C. (2015). Applying an inflation-targeting lens to macroprudential policy ‘institutions’. Journal of Central Banking, 11(4), 395–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (1997). The inflation target five years on. Speech. UK: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Natalucci, F., & Piger, J. (2004). The macroeconomic effects of inflation targeting. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, 86(4), 51–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Ye, H. (2007). Does inflation targeting really make a difference? Evaluating the treatment effect of inflation targeting in seven industrial countries. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8), 2521–2533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, P., Savastano, M. A., & Sharma, S. (1997). The scope for inflation targeting in developing countries, IMF Working Paper WP/97/130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. (2008). Does stabilizing inflation contribute to stabilizing economic activity? Speech 366. U.S.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2002). A decade of inflation targeting in the world: What do we know and what do we need to know? In N. Loayza, R. Soto & K. Schmidt-Hebbel (Eds.), Inflation targeting: Design, performance, challenges. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2007). Does inflation targeting make a difference? In F. Mishkin, N. Loayza & K. Schmidt-Hebbel (Eds.), Monetary policy under inflation targeting. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, F., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2013). Monetary Policy decisions by the world’s central bank using real-time data. Instituto de Economia Working Paper 426, Catholic University of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, F., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2012). Do the World’s Central bank react to financial markets? Manuscript, Instituto de Economia, Catholic University of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, B., & Rizvo, S. (2009). Inflation targeting framework: Is the story different for Asian economies? MPRA Paper 19546. University of Muenchen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, S. (2009). Inflation targeting at 20: Achievements and challenges. IMF Working Paper WP/09/236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarina, A., & De Haan, J. (2014). Right on the target: Exploring the factors leading to inflation targeting adoption. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(2), 372–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Werner, A. M. (2002). Inflation targeting in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico: Performance, credibility, and the exchange rate. Economia, 2(2), 30–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1997). Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets. European Economic Review, 41(6), 1111–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1999). Price stability as a target for monetary policy: Defining and maintaining price stability. NBER Working Papers 7276. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (2007). Optimal inflation targeting: Further developments of inflation targeting. In F. Mishkin, N. Loayza & K. Schmidt-Hebbel (Eds.), Monetary policy under inflation targeting. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (2010). Inflation targeting. In B. Friedman & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of monetary economics. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1979). Estimation and control of a macroeconomic model with rational expectations. Econometrica, 47(5), 1267–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, M., & Winkelried, D. (2005). Inflation targeting and inflation behavior: A successful story? International Journal of Central Banking, 1(3), 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestin, D. (2006). Price-level versus inflation targeting. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(7), 1361–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. E. (2009). Inflation Targeting: What have we learned? International Finance, 12(2), 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (2015). Goals and rules in central bank design. CESifo Working Paper Series 5293. CESifo Group Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, L. (2006). Does inflation targeting matter? A reassessment. CEPS, Princeton University Working Paper 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2004). Does inflation targeting reduce inflation? An analysis for the OECD industrial countries. Central Bank of Brazil Working Paper 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, H. (2013). Does the exchange rate regime make a difference in inflation performance in developing and emerging countries? The role of inflation targeting. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 968–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt-Hebbel, K., Carrasco, M. (2016). The Past and Future of Inflation Targeting: Implications for Emerging-Market and Developing Economies. In: Ghate, C., Kletzer, K. (eds) Monetary Policy in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2840-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2840-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2838-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2840-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics