Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis of spectral subtraction and Weiner denoising techniques for musical noise reduction. The iterative spectral subtraction method provides least musical noise generation applied in different noisy environments. The method of musical noise production is traced by observing the change in the kurtosis ratio of noise spectrum using different denoising techniques for different noisy signal. A MATLAB simulation is performed for four different noisy environments car noise, babble noise, operation room noise and machine gun noise at −10, −5, 0, 5 and 10 dB input SNR levels. It is observed that wiener based methods provide more improvement in SNR as compared to spectral subtraction based methods. But at the same time musical noise generation is more in wiener based methods. The wiener based method HRNR gives a maximum 35.77 dB improvement in SNR for car noise at −10 dB input SNR level. Iterative spectral subtraction gives the minimum value of kurtosis ratio for all noises at all input SNR level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. C. Loizou, Speech Enhancement Theory and Practice, Boca Raton, FL: CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.
S. F. Boll, “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction”, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 27, no. 2, 1979, pp. 113–120.
M. Berouti, R. Schwartz, and J. Makhoul, “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise”, Proc. ICASSP, 1979, pp. 208–211.
R. McAulay and M. Malpass, “Speech enhancement using a soft-decisionnoise suppression filter”,IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 28, no. 2, 1980, pp. 137–145.
R. Martin, “Spectral subtraction based on minimum statistics”, Proc. EUSIPCO, 1994, pp. 1182–1185.
Cyril Plapous, Claude Marro, and Pascal Scalart, “Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation for Speech Enhancement” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Vol.14, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 2098–2108.
Pankaj Goel, Prateek Saxena, V.K. Gupta, Mahesh Chandra, “Comparative analysis of speech enhancement methods”, proc.10th IEEE Int.Confrence on Wireless and Optical networks, 2013, pp.1–5.
Y. Uemura, Y. Takahashi, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and K. Kondo, “Automatic optimization scheme of spectral subtraction based on musical noise assessment via higher-order statistics”, Proc. Of Int. Workshop. Acoust. Echo and Noise Control, 2008.
Y. Uemura, Y. Takahashi, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and K. Kondo, “Musical noise generation analysis noise reduction methods based on spectral subtraction and MMSE STSA estimation”, Proc. Of ICASSP, 2009, pp. 4433–4436.
Purav Goel, Anil Garg, “Developments in spectral subtraction for speech enhancement,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 055–063.
K. Yamashita, S. Ogata, and T. Shimamura, “Spectral subtraction iterated with weighting factors,” Proc. IEEE Speech Coding Workshop, 2002, pp. 138–140.
Kiyohiro Shikano, and Kazunobu KondoK. Yamashita, S. Ogata, and T. Shimamura, “Improved spectral subtraction utilizing iterative processing”, IEICE Trans. A, vol. 88, no. 11, 2005, pp. 1246–1257.
M. R. Khan and T. Hassan, “Iterative noise power subtraction technique for improved speech quality,” Proc. of Int. Conf. Elect. Comput. Eng, 2008, pp. 391–394.
X. Li, G. Li, and X. Li, “Improved voice activity detection based on iterative spectral subtraction and double thresholds for CVR,” Proc. of Workshop Power Electron. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2008, pp.153–156.
Yang Lu, Philipos C. Loizou, “A geometric approach to spectral subtraction,” Speech Communication, Vol. 50,2008, pp. 453–466.
C. Plapous, C. Marro, P. Scalart, and L. Mauuary, “A Two-Step Noise Reduction Technique,” IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, Canada, Vol. 1, 2004, pp. 289–292,
C. Plapous, C. Marro, and P. Scalart, “Speech Enhancement Using Harmonic Regeneration,”IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, USA, Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 157–160.
Ryoichi Miyazaki, Hiroshi Saruwatari, Takayuki Inoue, Yu Takahashi, “Musical-Noise-Free Speech Enhancement Based on Optimized Iterative Spectral Subtraction“, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, VOL. 20, NO. 7, 2012, pp. 2080–2094.
Y. Ephraım, and D. Malah, “Speech Enhancement Using a Minimum Mean-Square Error Short-Time Spectral Amplitude Estimator,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1984, pp. 1109–1121.
O. Capp´e, “Elimination of the Musical Noise Phenomenon with the Ephra¨ım and Malah Noise Suppressor,” IEEE Trans. Speech and audio Processing, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1994, pp. 345–349.
Samudravijaya K et. al., Hindi Speech Database, Proc. ICSLP00, Beijing, China, CDROM 00192.pdf.
A. Varga, H. J. M. Steeneken, D. Jones, “The noisex-92 study on the effect of additive noise on automatic speech recognition system,” Reports of NATO Research Study Group (RSG.10), June 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saxena, P., Gupta, V.K., Chandra, M. (2016). Musical Noise Reduction Capability of Various Speech Enhancement Algorithms. In: Satapathy, S.C., Mandal, J.K., Udgata, S.K., Bhateja, V. (eds) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 434. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2752-6_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2752-6_68
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2750-2
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2752-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)