Skip to main content

Musical Noise Reduction Capability of Various Speech Enhancement Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 434))

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of spectral subtraction and Weiner denoising techniques for musical noise reduction. The iterative spectral subtraction method provides least musical noise generation applied in different noisy environments. The method of musical noise production is traced by observing the change in the kurtosis ratio of noise spectrum using different denoising techniques for different noisy signal. A MATLAB simulation is performed for four different noisy environments car noise, babble noise, operation room noise and machine gun noise at −10, −5, 0, 5 and 10 dB input SNR levels. It is observed that wiener based methods provide more improvement in SNR as compared to spectral subtraction based methods. But at the same time musical noise generation is more in wiener based methods. The wiener based method HRNR gives a maximum 35.77 dB improvement in SNR for car noise at −10 dB input SNR level. Iterative spectral subtraction gives the minimum value of kurtosis ratio for all noises at all input SNR level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. C. Loizou, Speech Enhancement Theory and Practice, Boca Raton, FL: CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. F. Boll, “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction”, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 27, no. 2, 1979, pp. 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Berouti, R. Schwartz, and J. Makhoul, “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise”, Proc. ICASSP, 1979, pp. 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. McAulay and M. Malpass, “Speech enhancement using a soft-decisionnoise suppression filter”,IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 28, no. 2, 1980, pp. 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Martin, “Spectral subtraction based on minimum statistics”, Proc. EUSIPCO, 1994, pp. 1182–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyril Plapous, Claude Marro, and Pascal Scalart, “Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation for Speech Enhancement” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Vol.14, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 2098–2108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pankaj Goel, Prateek Saxena, V.K. Gupta, Mahesh Chandra, “Comparative analysis of speech enhancement methods”, proc.10th IEEE Int.Confrence on Wireless and Optical networks, 2013, pp.1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Uemura, Y. Takahashi, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and K. Kondo, “Automatic optimization scheme of spectral subtraction based on musical noise assessment via higher-order statistics”, Proc. Of Int. Workshop. Acoust. Echo and Noise Control, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Uemura, Y. Takahashi, H. Saruwatari, K. Shikano, and K. Kondo, “Musical noise generation analysis noise reduction methods based on spectral subtraction and MMSE STSA estimation”, Proc. Of ICASSP, 2009, pp. 4433–4436.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Purav Goel, Anil Garg, “Developments in spectral subtraction for speech enhancement,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 055–063.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Yamashita, S. Ogata, and T. Shimamura, “Spectral subtraction iterated with weighting factors,” Proc. IEEE Speech Coding Workshop, 2002, pp. 138–140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiyohiro Shikano, and Kazunobu KondoK. Yamashita, S. Ogata, and T. Shimamura, “Improved spectral subtraction utilizing iterative processing”, IEICE Trans. A, vol. 88, no. 11, 2005, pp. 1246–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. R. Khan and T. Hassan, “Iterative noise power subtraction technique for improved speech quality,” Proc. of Int. Conf. Elect. Comput. Eng, 2008, pp. 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  14. X. Li, G. Li, and X. Li, “Improved voice activity detection based on iterative spectral subtraction and double thresholds for CVR,” Proc. of Workshop Power Electron. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2008, pp.153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Lu, Philipos C. Loizou, “A geometric approach to spectral subtraction,” Speech Communication, Vol. 50,2008, pp. 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Plapous, C. Marro, P. Scalart, and L. Mauuary, “A Two-Step Noise Reduction Technique,” IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, Canada, Vol. 1, 2004, pp. 289–292,

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Plapous, C. Marro, and P. Scalart, “Speech Enhancement Using Harmonic Regeneration,”IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, USA, Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ryoichi Miyazaki, Hiroshi Saruwatari, Takayuki Inoue, Yu Takahashi, “Musical-Noise-Free Speech Enhancement Based on Optimized Iterative Spectral Subtraction“, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, VOL. 20, NO. 7, 2012, pp. 2080–2094.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Ephraım, and D. Malah, “Speech Enhancement Using a Minimum Mean-Square Error Short-Time Spectral Amplitude Estimator,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1984, pp. 1109–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Capp´e, “Elimination of the Musical Noise Phenomenon with the Ephra¨ım and Malah Noise Suppressor,” IEEE Trans. Speech and audio Processing, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1994, pp. 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Samudravijaya K et. al., Hindi Speech Database, Proc. ICSLP00, Beijing, China, CDROM 00192.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Varga, H. J. M. Steeneken, D. Jones, “The noisex-92 study on the effect of additive noise on automatic speech recognition system,” Reports of NATO Research Study Group (RSG.10), June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prateek Saxena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saxena, P., Gupta, V.K., Chandra, M. (2016). Musical Noise Reduction Capability of Various Speech Enhancement Algorithms. In: Satapathy, S.C., Mandal, J.K., Udgata, S.K., Bhateja, V. (eds) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 434. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2752-6_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2752-6_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2750-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2752-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics