Skip to main content

Biofuel Production Along with Remediation of Sewage Water Through Algae

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Algae and Environmental Sustainability

Part of the book series: Developments in Applied Phycology ((DAPH,volume 7))

Abstract

The current study aims to formulate an alternative cost-effective sustainable wastewater treatment option for towns and cities in India through a comparative assessment of the treatment efficacy of mechanical treatment systems, facultative pond-based systems, and man-made lake systems based on physico-chemical and biological parameters. The key treatment parameters were analysed along with the assessment of total annual cost for operation of facultative pond and mechanical treatment systems. The results show that lake systems performed well under higher organic load with the removal efficiency of 70 % chemical oxygen demand (COD), 73 % total nitrogen (TN) and 22 % total phosphorus (TP). However, facultative pond-based systems were effective in the removal of up to 93 % suspended solid (SS) and 82 % biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). The conventional mechanical treatment removed 98 % SS, 74 % COD and 63 % BOD and is ineffective in the removal of nutrients. Furthermore, wastewater algae growing in lakes and ponds showed better lipid content (25–28 %) with suitable fatty acids (C16–C18 > 90 %). The FAME analysis showed high C16:0 (>40 %) followed by C18 fatty acids that further provides scope for algal biofuel generation to meet the regional energy demand. This necessitates an efficient algal capture mechanism to free the final treated effluent from algal BOD and solids and use of algal biomass as viable energy alternatives. Nutrient-integrated treatment efficiency (NITE) based on physical, chemical and biological factors has been devised for evaluating treatment efficiencies. Based on these efficiencies and cost of organic matter and nutrient removal for domestic wastewater treatment options, the best results were obtained for the lake and facultative algal pond-based systems which would be highly effective in Indian context and pave a way for sustainable wastewater treatment with resource recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcocer J, Lugo A, Alejandra L, Rosario M (1993) Efficiency of a waste stabilization pond system in a subtropical area of Mexico. Rev Int Contam Ambient 9(l):29–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreadakis A, Mamais D, Gavalaki E, Panagiotopoulou V (2003) Evaluation of treatment schemes appropriate for wastewater reuse in Greece. Glob Nest Int J 5(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (American Public Health Association) AWWA WEF (1995) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano T (1991) Planning and implementation for water reuse projects. Water Sci Technol 24(9):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Status of wastewater generation and treatment in India. Resour document. www.umweltbundesamt.at/…/3bStatus_of_Wastewater_India.pdf Accessed 4 Aug 2011

  • Chanakya HN, Sharatchandra HC (2008) Nitrogen pool, flows, impact and sustainability issues of human waste management in the city of Bangalore. Curr Sci 94:1447–1454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chanakya HN, Mahapatra DM, Sarada R, Chauhan VS, Abitha R (2012) Sustainability of large-scale algal biofuel production in India. J Ind Inst Sci 92:63–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chanakya HN, Mahapatra DM, Sarada R, Abitha R (2013) Algal biofuel production and mitigation potential in India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 18:113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colmenarejo MF, Rubio A, Sanchez E, Vicente J, Gracia MG, Bojra R (2006) Evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants with different technologies at Las-Rozas, Madrid (Spain). J Environ Manage 81:399–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • da Costa RHR, Medri W (2002) Modelling and optimisation of stabilisation ponds system for the treatment of swine wastes: organic matter evaluation. Braz Arch Biol Technol 45(3):385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driche M, Abdessemed D, Nezzal G (2008) Treatment of wastewater by natural lagoon for its reuse in irrigation. Am J Eng Appl Sci 1(4):408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson RHC, Morse GK, Lester JN (1995) The life-cycle analysis of small-scale sewage treatment plants. J Chart Inst Water Environ Manage 9(3):317–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RG (1976) Virus and bacteria removal from wastewater by land treatment. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:333

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green FB, Lundquist TJ, Oswald WJ (1995) Energetics of advanced integrated wastewater pond systems. Water Sci Technol 31:9–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah SA, Austern BM, Early AE, Wise RH (1986) Comparative removal of toxic pollutants by six wastewater treatment processes. J Water Pollut Control Fed 58(1):27–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helmer R, Hespanbol I (1997) Water pollution control: a guide to the use of water quality management principles. WHO/UNEP, Printed in Great Britain by St Edmundsbury Press, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Sancho F, Ramon S-G (2009) Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach. Desalination 249:230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2011) Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes. Desalination 268:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann JP (1998) Wastewater treatment with suspended and non-suspended algae. J Phycol 34:757–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath A, Hendrickson CT (1988) Steel versus steel-reinforced bridges: environmental assessment. J Infra Syst 4(3):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamwal P, Mittal AK (2010) Reuse of treated sewage in Delhi city: microbial evaluations of STP’s and reuse options. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JICA (2005) The study on water quality management plan for Ganga River in the Republic of India. Final report, The Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RP, Pinto LB, Somashekar RK (2010) Assessment of the efficiency of the sewage treatment plants: a comparative study between Nagasandra and Mylasandra STP’s. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol 6(2):115–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Ramachandra TV (2013) Algal biofuel: bountiful lipid from Chlorococcum sp. proliferating in municipal wastewater. Curr Sci 105:47–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2011a) Assessment of treatment capabilities of Varthur Lake, Bangalore, India. Int J Environ Technol Manage 14(1–4):84–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2011b) Role of macrophytes in sewage fed urban lake. Inst Integr Omics Appl Biotechnol 2(8):1–09

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2011c) C:N ratio of sediments in a sewage fed urban lake. Int J Geol 5(3):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013a) Euglena sp. as a suitable source of lipids for potential use as biofuel and sustainable wastewater treatment. J Appl Phycol 25:855–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013b) Treatment efficacy of algae based sewage treatment plants. Environ Monit Assess 185:7145–7164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013c) Nano-scale characterization of wastewater euglenoides with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). In: Proceedings of 6th Bangalore India NANO. Hotel Lalit Ashok, Bangalore, India 5–6th December 2013, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013d) Raman micro-spectroscopy for characterization of lipids in oleaginous algae in-vivo. In: Conference proceedings, FCS, National Fluorescence Workshop “Fluorescence Methods in Single Molecule Spectroscopy” at IISc and JNCASR, Bangalore, India 24–28th November 2013, p 96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013e) Sustainable wastewater treatment and biofuel generation for Bangalore City using continuous algal reactors. In: Proceedings of the Indo-UK perspective on water quality: threats, technologies and pptions, Royal Society of Chemistry. IISc Bangalore, Karnataka 13–14th August 2013, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013f) Bioenergy generation from components of a continuous algal bioreactor: analysis of lipids, spectroscopic and thermal properties. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE INDICON conference on impact of engineering on global sustainability, IIT Bombay, India 12–15th December 2013, pp 183–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2014) Bioremediation and lipid synthesis of myxotrophic algal consortia in municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 168:142–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.130

  • Mara D (1997) Design manual for waste stabilization ponds in India. Lagoon Technology International, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlebrooks EJ, Middlebrooks CH, Reed SC (1981) Energy requirements for small wastewater treatment systems. J Water Pollut Control Fed 53(7):1172–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz R, Guieysse B (2006) Algal–bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review. Water Res 40:2799–2815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley SM (2005) A case study of the use of wastewater stabilization ponds in Honduras. Small Flow Q 6(2):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Onkal G, Demir I (2006) Cost analysis of alternative methods for wastewater handling in small communities. J Environ Manage 79:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB, Golueke CG, Kellen WR (1957) Algae in waste treatment. Sewage Ind Waste 29:437–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme U, Lundin M, Tillman AM, Molander S (2005) Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems-researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 43:293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettygrove GS, Asano T (1984) Irrigation with reclaimed municipal wastewater-a guidance manual. Rep. 84–1 wr. SWRCB, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra TV, Kumar U (2008) Wetlands of greater Bangalore, India: automatic delineation through pattern classifiers. Elect Green J 26:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra TV, Mahapatra DM (2012) Scope of algal biofuel from wastewater. In: 8th national conference on Indian energy sector “Synergy with Energy”. Conference proceedings, AMA, Ahmadabad, Maharashtra, India 11–12th October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra TV, Mahapatra DM, Karthick B, Gordon R (2009) Milking diatoms for sustainable energy: biochemical engineering vs. gasoline secreting diatom solar panels. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:8769–8788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra TV, Mahapatra DM, Samantray S, Joshi NV (2013) Biofuel from urban wastewater: scope and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:767–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed SC (1991) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Bio Cycle 32:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed SC, Crites RW, Middlebrooks EJ (1995) Natural systems for waste management and treatment, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on National Commission on Integrated Water Resources Development (NCIWRD) (1999) for high and low demand scenarios. http://www.cwc.nic.in/main/downloads/Restructuring%20of%20CWC%20Report%20Vol-II%20c.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2011

  • Sadeghpoor M, Hosseini B, Ghasem D (2009) Assessment of wastewater treatment plant’s performance in amol industrial park. Am Eur J Agric Environ Sci 5(5):707–711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samie A, Obi CL, Igumbor JO, Momba MNB (2009) Focus on 14 sewage treatment plants in the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa in order to gauge the efficiency of wastewater treatment. Afr J Biotechnol 8(14):3276–3285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato N, Okuboa T, Onoderaa T, Agrawal L, Ohashi K, Haradaa AH (2007) Economic evaluation of sewage treatment processes in India. J Environ Manage 84:447–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shakunthala B, Srikantaswamy S, Shivakumar D (2010) Urban wastewater characteristic and its management in urban areas – a case study of Mysore City, Karnataka, India. J Water Resour Prot 2:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D, Dubey A (2011) Assessment and treatment of municipal wastewater of Indore city of India. Arch Appl Sci Res 31:450–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Yuan W, Pei ZJ, Wu Q, Mao E (2009) Microalgae mass production methods. Trans Asabe 52:1275–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling MV (1996) Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment in developing countries. Int Symp Technol Trans 1:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1997) UNEP-International Environmental Technology Centre. Unit of sustainable development and environment. Source book of alternative technologies for freshwater augmentation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2002) Onsite wastewater treatment systems manual, EPA/625/R-00/008, February 2002. Accessed 4 Sept 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Min M, Li Y, Chen P, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Ruan R (2009) Cultivation of green algae Chlorella sp. in different wastewaters from municipal wastewater treatment plant. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 110:448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Environment Federation/American Society of Civil Engineers (WEF/ASCE) (1992) Design of municipal wastewater treatment plants. 2 vols. WEF manual of practice No. 8/ASCE manual and report on engineering practice No. 36, Alexandria [Supersedes WCPF/ASCE (1977).]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India and Indian Institute of Science for the financial and infrastructure support. We also thank Ms. Harini and Ms. Neethu Sri, for the co-operation during field sample collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Ramachandra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramachandra, T.V., Mahapatra, D.M., Bhat, S.P., Joshi, N.V. (2015). Biofuel Production Along with Remediation of Sewage Water Through Algae. In: Singh, B., Bauddh, K., Bux, F. (eds) Algae and Environmental Sustainability. Developments in Applied Phycology, vol 7. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2641-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics