Skip to main content

Soil Fertility Management in Semiarid Regions: The Sociocultural, Economic and Livelihood Dimensions of Farmers’ Practices—A Case of Andhra Pradesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature, Economy and Society

Abstract

Green Revolution technology gains in agricultural productivity and food security were widely associated with irrigated lands. However, there are now widespread problems associated with the use of chemical fertilisers, mismanagement of surface water and overexploitation of groundwater. Potential for expanding irrigated agriculture is decreasing and hence rainfed agriculture remains high on India’s development agenda. As a major provider of organic manure, livestock are crucial to the stability of dryland agriculture. Soil fertility management affects not only farmers but also landless poor, cattle owners and shepherds. Based on the fieldwork done in Andhra Pradesh, this study explores the local farmers’ in-depth knowledge on soil fertility management, and the cultural and socioeconomic web woven around these practices. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used for understanding the farmers’ soil fertility management practices and the conditions under which they adopt such practices. The present study revealed that farmers in semiarid regions are actively managing soil fertility and other soil properties through diverse practices that are based on local resources and knowledge. This study highlights the contribution of organic matter by traditional soil fertility management practices in maintaining soil fertility. Regression analysis revealed that “large ruminants” is a key variable influencing soil fertility. The empirical results of this study call for an argument to be made for an approach to supporting soil fertility management by farmers that is more attuned to the range of circumstances that is found on the ground and best suits the long-term productivity of soils.

B. Suresh Reddy is an associate professor at the Division for Sustainable Development Studies (DSDS), Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Hyderabad. This chapter is based on my doctoral research work at CESS. An earlier version of this chapter has been published in Economic and Political Weekly (EPW), dated 15 January 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Semiarid refers to a climatic classification of typically dry areas with rainfall ranging from 500 to 950 mm and evaporative demand in excess of rainfall for a greater part of the year.

  2. 2.

    γ is the ratio of individual variation to total variation in output, i.e. \(\gamma ={{\sigma }^{2}}_{u}/{{\sigma }^{2}}_{v}+{{\sigma }^{2}}_{u}.\)

References

  • Adolph B, Butterwoth, J (2002) Soil fertility management in semi-arid India: its role in agricultural systems and the livelihoods of poor people. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1988) Prediction of farm-level technical efficiencies with a generalised frontier production function and panel data. J Econom 38: 387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth J, Adolph B, Suresh RB (2003) How farmers manage soil fertility. A guide to support innovation and livelihood. Andhra Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Programme/Chattam: Natural Resources Institute, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (2006) CMIE Energy, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1995) Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. In: Nelson N, Wright S (eds) Power and participatory development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 30–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Hazell P (2000) Should developing countries invest more in less favoured areas? An empirical analysis of rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, April 22, pp 1455–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertiliser Association of India (2006) Annual report, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2008) Economic survey 2007–2008, Ministry of Finance, Economic Division, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilhorst T, Muchena FM (2000) Nutrients on the move—soil fertility dynamics in African farming systems. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz E, Pagiola S, Reiche C (1994) The cost and benefits of soil conservation: the farmers’ view point. World Bank Res Obs 9(2):273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poinetti C, Suresh RB (2002) “Farmers’ perceptions of crop diversity in the Deccan Plateau”, SEEDLING, Quarterly Newsletter of Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN), Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Purakayastha TJ, Swarup A, Singh D (2008) Strategies to manage soil organic matter for carbon sequestration—Indian perspective. Indian J Fertili 4(3):11–16, 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy RV (1999a) Valuation of renewable natural resources: user perspective. Econ Polit Wkly XXXIV(23):1435–1437 5th June

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy UR (1999b) “Integrated nutrient management in tomato-onion cropping system”, unpublished PhD thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy RV (2001) User valuation of renewable natural resources: the user perspective. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy SB (2010a) “Assessment of economic and ecological returns from millet-based bio-diverse organic farms vis-à-vis conventional farms”, CESS Monograph series No. 8, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy SB (2010b) “Soil fertility management in semi-arid regions: the socio-cultural, economic and livelihood dimensions of farmers’ practices—a case of Andhra Pradesh”, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Dr. B. R. Amebedkar University, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy SB (2010c) Organic farming: status, issues and prospects—a review, Journal of Agricultural Economics Research Review, Vol. 23, July–December, pp 197–208. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagari (2004) Livelihoods and gender: equity in community resource management, overcoming gender barriers: local knowledge systems and animal health in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Earth Scan Publication Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woomer PL, Martin A, Albrecht A, Resck D, Scharpenseel H (1994) The importance and management of soil organic matter in the tropics In: Wommer, PL, Swift MJ (eds) The biological management of tropical soil fertility. Wiley-Sayce, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is based on my doctoral research work. I am grateful to my Ph.D. supervisor V. Ratna Reddy, Livelihoods and Natural Resources Management Institute (LNRMI), Hyderabad, for his insightful comments and great support. Thanks to C. S. Sambamurthy and Jyothis Sathyapalan of CESS for their valuable comments on the thesis draft. I am grateful to S. Galab, Director CESS, and M. Gopinath Reddy, CESS, for their strong support. I am indebted to the farmers of study villages who contributed a lot to my research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Suresh Reddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Indian Society for Ecological Economics

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reddy, B. (2016). Soil Fertility Management in Semiarid Regions: The Sociocultural, Economic and Livelihood Dimensions of Farmers’ Practices—A Case of Andhra Pradesh . In: Ghosh, N., Mukhopadhyay, P., Shah, A., Panda, M. (eds) Nature, Economy and Society. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2404-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2404-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2403-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2404-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics