Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Sustainable Design Method Acting as an Innovation Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 2

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 35))

Abstract

Product companies generally see sustainability as a burden limiting their design process, similar to cost or safety limits. A method for sustainable design was created, attempting to turn sustainability from a burden into an innovation tool with inherent business value. The method combines creative whole-systems thinking with quantitative sustainability metrics. It facilitates innovation by the creation of visual whole-system maps that encourage more thorough and more radical brainstorming. It facilitates sustainability by using quantitative measurements, such as life-cycle assessment or point-based certification systems, to set priorities and choose final designs. The method has been anecdotally tested in classes at four universities, and many of the companies partnering with these classes have said the students provided both sustainability and feature /functionality benefits. This paper also compares the method to Lindahl’s nine recommendations for being useful to engineering designers. Thus there is at least anecdotal evidence that the design method may turn sustainability from a burden into an innovation tool. Future studies should compare the method against industry-leading innovation and green design methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. US Green Building Council, Three Billion Square Feet of Green Building Space LEED-Certified [Press Release]. Accessed 14 April 2014 from http://www.usgbc.org/articles/three-billion-square-feet-green-building-space-leed%AE-certified

  2. Behrisch, J., Ramirez, M., Giurco, D.: The use of ecodesign strategies and tools: State of the art in industrial design praxis. In: Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Conference, Delft. 25–29 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  3. Behrisch, J., Ramirez, M., Giurco, D.: Representation of ecodesign practice: international comparison of industrial design consultancies. Sustainability 3(10), 1778–1791 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bansal, P.: The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy. Manage. Executive. 16(2), 122–131 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauschild, M., et al.: From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. CIRP Ann. Manufact. Technol. 54(2), 1–21 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Millet, D., Bistagnino., et al.: Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs?, J. Clean. Prod. 15(4): 335–346 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centre for Sustainable Design: Sustainable Innovation 2014 conference website. http://cfsd.org.uk/events/sustainable-innovation-2014/. Accessed on 14 May 2014

  8. Collado-Ruiz, D., Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, H.: Influence of environmental information on creativity. Des. Stud. 31(5), 479–498 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waage, S.A.: Re-considering product design: a practical ‘road-map’ for integration of sustainability issues. J. Clean. Prod. 15(7), 638–649 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benyus, J.: Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, Harper Perennial (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, D.: The Natural Step: Towards a Sustainable Society, Green Books (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crul, M., Diehl, J. C.: Design for Sustainability: A Practical Approach For Developing Economies, UNEP/Earthprint (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lovins, A., et al.: Factor Ten Engineering Design Principles, Rocky Mountain Institute (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MBDC, LLC.: Overview of the Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard. Accessed 14 May 2014 from http://www.c2ccertified.org/images/uploads/C2CCertified_V3_Overview_121113.pdf (2012)

  15. IEEE Standards Board, IEEE 1680: Standard for Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer Products, Including Laptop Personal Computers, Desktop Personal Computers, and Personal Computer Monitors, IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baines, T.S. et al.: State-of-the-art in product-service systems. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 221, no. 10, pp. 1543–1552 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hart, S.L., Ahuja, G.: Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy. Environ. 5(1), 30–37 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Konar, S., Cohen, M.A.: Does the market value environmental performance? Rev. Econ. Stat. 83(2), 281–289 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.: Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan. Manag. Rev. 40, 41–54 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roos, J. (Ed.): Intellectual capital, Macmillan (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindahl, M.: Engineering designers’ experience of design for environment methods and tools–Requirement definitions from an interview study. J. Clean. Prod. 14(5), 487–496 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menter, A.: Autodesk sustainability workshop: advancing the practice of sustainable engineering through education. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST) pp. 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eggermont, M., Rosehart, W. B.: Integration of desired learning outcomes in a first year design course. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Faludi, J.: Sustainable design education through modular online content. Soc. Info. Technol. Teacher Edu. Int. Conf. 2012(1), 3599–3601 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schlecht, L. L.A.: Impact of prototyping resource environments on idea generation in product design, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Unknown,: Reviews and Resources, J. Edu. Sustain. Develop. 6: 161 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goedkoop, M., Spriensma, R.: The Eco-Indicator99: A Damage Oriented Method For Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Pré Consultants (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., et al.: Recipe 2008. A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level, Pré Consultants (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P.: Give design a break? the role of incubation periods during idea generation, DS 58-2. In: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design Theory and Research Methodology, vol. 2, pp. 24–27 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P.: The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J. Creative. Behav 45(2), 130–146 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meadows, D.: Leverage points. Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland, Vermont, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Adam Menter and Dawn Danby of Autodesk for their support of the method.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA

    Jeremy Faludi

Authors
  1. Jeremy Faludi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Faludi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

    Amaresh Chakrabarti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Faludi, J. (2015). A Sustainable Design Method Acting as an Innovation Tool. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 35. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2228-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2229-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation