Skip to main content

An Empirical Model to Foster Innovation and Learning Through Knowledge Sharing Culture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

In today’s knowledge-based economy, knowledge is the most important resource for an organization to gain competitive advantage (Stewart 1996). Knowledge creation, sharing, and dissemination are the main activities in knowledge management. Being part of knowledge management (KM) process (Kim and King 2004), knowledge sharing is the exchange of experience, events, thoughts, or understanding of anything. Knowledge sharing culture is viewed as an important process because it results in shared intellectual capital (Liao et al. 2007). Knowledge sharing culture is defined in many ways: Culture with a positive orientation to knowledge is the one that highly values learning on and off the job (Davenport et al. 1998); positive attitudes of leaders and colleagues toward knowledge processes (Dobrai and Farkas 2008); people would share ideas and insights because they see it as natural rather than something they are forced to do (McDermott and O’Dell 2001); and a way of organizational life that enables and motivates people to create, share, and utilize knowledge (Oliver and Kandadi 2006). Knowledge sharing culture impacts the organization in many ways – at individual, group, and organizational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality and behaviour. OUP, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, Paul I (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur JB, Huntley CL (2005) Ramping up the organizational learning curve: assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Acad Manage J 48(6):1159–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A, Cabrera EF (2002) Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organ Stud 23:687–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang MK (1998) Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. J Bus Ethics 17(16):1825–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ, Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Acad Manage J 49(3):544–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Manage Sci 50(3):352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran L, Olphert W (2000) Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behav Inf Technol 19(6):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1997) Information ecology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, De Long DW, Beers MC (1998) Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Manage Rev 39(2):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrai K, Farkas F (2008) Knowledge-based services: examining knowledge processes in public-serving nonprofit organizations. Int J Knowl Cult Change Manage 8(2):9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Araujo L (1999) Organisational learning: current debates and opportunities. In: Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J, Araujo L (eds) Organisational learning and the learning organisation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurteen D (2000) Creating a knowledge sharing culture. Knowl Manage Mag 2(5), February 1999 http://www.ikmagazine.com/xq/asp/txtSearch.david+gurteen/exactphrase.1/sid.6D1D2F97-D8A0-4493-BCE5-9164C3C10AFF/articleid.5FF740F3-3298-4353-B9AE-30D0B4F41AFE/qx/display.htm

  • Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge network: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ Sci 13(3):232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu IC (2006) Enhancing employee tendencies to share knowledge – case studies of nine companies in Taiwan. Int J Inf Manage 26(4):326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley RF, Hult GTM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Mark 62:42–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SE, Chuang C-H, Harden EE, Jiang Y, Joseph JM (2006) Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In: Joseph JM (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 25. JAI, Amsterdam, pp 27–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R, Hawke G (2002) Case studies of organizations with established learning cultures. National Centre for Vocational Education Research, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo B (2007) The impact of contextual and personal characteristics on employee creativity in Korean firms. Thesis, University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Straw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 10, J.A.I. Press, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, King J (2004) Managing knowledge work: specialization and collaboration of engineering problem-solving. J Knowl Manage 8(2):36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N (2005) Assessing the learning culture and performance of educational institutions. Perform Improv 44(9):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-H, Kim Y-G, Kim M-Y (2006) Effects of managerial drivers and climate maturity on knowledge-management performance: empirical validation. Inf Resourc Manage J 19(3):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao SH, Fei WC, Chen CC (2007) Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. J Inf Sci 33(3):340–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H (2007) Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. Int J Manpow 28(3/4):315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas B, Hult G, Ferrell O (1996) A theoretic perspective of the antecedents and consequences of organizational learning in marketing channels. J Bus Res 36(3):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick V, Watkins K (1994) The learning organisation: an integrative vision for HRD. Hum Resour Dev Q 5(4):353360

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott R, O’Dell C (2001) Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. J Knowl Manage 5(1):76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka IO, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver S, Kandadi KR (2006) How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed organizations. J Knowl Manage 10(4):6–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough H (2003) Knowledge management, HRM and innovation process. Int J Manpower 24(5):501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. Doubleday Currency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart TA (1996) Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organization. Doubleday Currency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WA, Wright GH (2004) Organizational readiness for successful knowledge sharing: challenges for public sector managers. Inf Resour Manage J 17(2):22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Angle HL (1989) An introduction to the Minnesota innovation research program. In: Van de Ven AH, Angle HL, Poole MS (eds) Research on the management of innovation. Harper & Row, New York, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2002) Knowledge management: the benefits and limitations of computer systems. Eur Manage J 19(6):599–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijila Kennedy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kennedy, V., Priyadarsini, M.K. (2013). An Empirical Model to Foster Innovation and Learning Through Knowledge Sharing Culture. In: Mukhopadhyay, C., et al. Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics