Skip to main content

Innovation Objectives, Strategies and Firm Performance: A Study of Emerging Market Firms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Emerging market firms pursue multiple innovation objectives to counter the effects of environmental complexity and uncertainty. The innovation objectives so selected define the innovation strategy adopted by the firm. Innovation strategies however are characterised by innovation objective trade-offs based on a collection of positively and negatively impacted objectives. The research identifies the various trade-off baskets for each innovation strategy and the impact of these strategies on the innovation performance of the firm. Firms can accordingly balance the positively and negatively impacted objectives by carefully selecting a suitable strategy and achieve superior innovation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antoncic JA, Antoncic B (2011) Employee satisfaction, intrapreneurship and firm growth: a model. Ind Manage Data Syst 111(4):589–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr PS (2004) Current and potential importance of qualitative methods in strategy research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, pp 165–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell R, Pain N (1997) Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe. Econ J 107(445):1770–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman R, Maidique MA, Wheelwright SC (2004) Strategic management of technology and innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2008) Orchestrating appropriability: towards an endogenous view of capturing value from innovation investments. In: Shane S (ed) Handbook of technology and innovation management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs JG, Crook TR, Shook CL (2005) The dimensionality of organizational performance and its performance and its implications for strategic management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 2. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 259–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine A, Marianne WL (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Picken JC (2000) Changing roles: leadership in the 21st century. Organ Dyn 28:18–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteve A, Ramon CM (2010) Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad Manage Rev 35(1):27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyring MJ, Johnson MW, Nair H (2011) New business models in emerging markets. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):88–95, 8p, 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma S, Gong Y, Gorg H (2009) What determines innovation activity in Chinese State-owned enterprises? The role of foreign direct investment. World Dev 37(4):866–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan JC, Yam RC, Tang EP, Lau AKW (2009) Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: evidences in Beijing, China. Res Policy 38:802–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan KR (2009) Using hybrid research methodologies for testing contingency theories of strategy. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 5. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill CWL, Rothaermel TF (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope J (2009) Performance management in the innovation age: An introduction. Innovation in Action Series. IBM Cognos Innovation Center for Performance Management. Copyright IBM Corporation 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resourc Econ 45(1):133–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GK, Lanctot A, Teegen HJ (2001) Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. J Bus Ventur 16(3):255–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B, Samson D (2001) Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capability approach. Int J Innov Manage 5(3):377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources and the benefits of breadth. Strateg Manage J 31:224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Guo H, Liu Y, Li M (2008) Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization: evidence from China’s transitional economy. J Prod Innov Manage 25:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshe F (2010) Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad Manage Rev 35(2):202–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto MJ, Santamaría L (2010) Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. J Small Bus Manage 48(1):44–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass A, Weerawardena J (2009) Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1325–1348, 24p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish ED, Cassill NL, Oxenham W (2006) Niche market strategy for a mature marketplace. Mark Intell Plann 24(7):694–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo DI, Sohal AS (2003) The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: an empirical examination. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 20(8):901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman IH, Kar A, Raven R, Singh D, Tiwari J, Jha R, Sinha PK, Mirza A (2010) Rural energy transitions in developing countries: a case of the Uttam Urja initiative in India. Environ Sci Policy 13(4):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez R (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manage J 16:135–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver JM (2007) Interpreting empirical results in strategy and management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 4. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 273–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek Z, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH (2005) Challenges and guidelines for conducting internet based surveys in strategic management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 2. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 179–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slater SF, Atuahene-Gima K (2004) Conducting survey research in strategic management. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd, Burlington, pp 227–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, Calantone R (2005) Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strateg Manage J 26:259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage J 28(13):1319–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J (2001) Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. Int J Manage Rev 3(3):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy D, Agndal H (2010) Network resource combinations in the international venturing of small biotech firms. Technovation 30(1):24–36, 13p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomovic CL, Ncube LB, Walton A, Grieves M (2010) Development of product lifecycle management metrics: measuring the impact of PLM. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 19(3–4):167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai M, Tsai C (2010) Innovation capability and performance in Taiwanese science parks: exploring the moderating effects of industrial clusters fabric. Int J Organ Innov 2:80–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y, Lin JY, Kurekova L (2009) Innovative R&D and optimal investment under uncertainty in high-tech industries: an implication for emerging economies. Res Policy 38:1388–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manage Rev 38:8–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss JG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad Manage J 51(1):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woertera M, Roper S (2010) Openness and innovation—home and export demand effects on manufacturing innovation: panel data evidence for Ireland and Switzerland. Res Policy 39(1):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yam RC, Lo W, Tang EP, Lau AK (2011) Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Res Policy 40:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility and product innovation. Strateg Manage J 31:547–561

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aniruddha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aniruddha (2013). Innovation Objectives, Strategies and Firm Performance: A Study of Emerging Market Firms. In: Mukhopadhyay, C., et al. Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics