Abstract
Emerging market firms pursue multiple innovation objectives to counter the effects of environmental complexity and uncertainty. The innovation objectives so selected define the innovation strategy adopted by the firm. Innovation strategies however are characterised by innovation objective trade-offs based on a collection of positively and negatively impacted objectives. The research identifies the various trade-off baskets for each innovation strategy and the impact of these strategies on the innovation performance of the firm. Firms can accordingly balance the positively and negatively impacted objectives by carefully selecting a suitable strategy and achieve superior innovation performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antoncic JA, Antoncic B (2011) Employee satisfaction, intrapreneurship and firm growth: a model. Ind Manage Data Syst 111(4):589–607
Barr PS (2004) Current and potential importance of qualitative methods in strategy research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, pp 165–188
Barrell R, Pain N (1997) Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe. Econ J 107(445):1770–1786
Burgelman R, Maidique MA, Wheelwright SC (2004) Strategic management of technology and innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Chesbrough H (2008) Orchestrating appropriability: towards an endogenous view of capturing value from innovation investments. In: Shane S (ed) Handbook of technology and innovation management. Wiley, Chichester
Combs JG, Crook TR, Shook CL (2005) The dimensionality of organizational performance and its performance and its implications for strategic management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 2. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 259–286
Constantine A, Marianne WL (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717
Dess GG, Picken JC (2000) Changing roles: leadership in the 21st century. Organ Dyn 28:18–34
Esteve A, Ramon CM (2010) Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad Manage Rev 35(1):27–47
Eyring MJ, Johnson MW, Nair H (2011) New business models in emerging markets. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):88–95, 8p, 2
Girma S, Gong Y, Gorg H (2009) What determines innovation activity in Chinese State-owned enterprises? The role of foreign direct investment. World Dev 37(4):866–873
Guan JC, Yam RC, Tang EP, Lau AKW (2009) Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: evidences in Beijing, China. Res Policy 38:802–812
Harrigan KR (2009) Using hybrid research methodologies for testing contingency theories of strategy. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 5. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 121–136
Hill CWL, Rothaermel TF (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):257–274
Hope J (2009) Performance management in the innovation age: An introduction. Innovation in Action Series. IBM Cognos Innovation Center for Performance Management. Copyright IBM Corporation 2009
Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resourc Econ 45(1):133–155
Jones GK, Lanctot A, Teegen HJ (2001) Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. J Bus Ventur 16(3):255–283
Lawson B, Samson D (2001) Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capability approach. Int J Innov Manage 5(3):377–400
Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources and the benefits of breadth. Strateg Manage J 31:224–236
Li Y, Guo H, Liu Y, Li M (2008) Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization: evidence from China’s transitional economy. J Prod Innov Manage 25:63–78
Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw Hill, New York
Moshe F (2010) Beyond dualism: stability and change as a duality. Acad Manage Rev 35(2):202–225
Nieto MJ, Santamaría L (2010) Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. J Small Bus Manage 48(1):44–69
O’Cass A, Weerawardena J (2009) Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1325–1348, 24p
Parrish ED, Cassill NL, Oxenham W (2006) Niche market strategy for a mature marketplace. Mark Intell Plann 24(7):694–707
Prajogo DI, Sohal AS (2003) The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: an empirical examination. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 20(8):901–918
Rehman IH, Kar A, Raven R, Singh D, Tiwari J, Jha R, Sinha PK, Mirza A (2010) Rural energy transitions in developing countries: a case of the Uttam Urja initiative in India. Environ Sci Policy 13(4):303–311
Sanchez R (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manage J 16:135–159
Shaver JM (2007) Interpreting empirical results in strategy and management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 4. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 273–293
Simsek Z, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH (2005) Challenges and guidelines for conducting internet based surveys in strategic management research. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 2. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 179–196
Slater SF, Atuahene-Gima K (2004) Conducting survey research in strategic management. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd, Burlington, pp 227–249
Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, Calantone R (2005) Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strateg Manage J 26:259–276
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage J 28(13):1319–1350
Tidd J (2001) Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. Int J Manage Rev 3(3):169–183
Tolstoy D, Agndal H (2010) Network resource combinations in the international venturing of small biotech firms. Technovation 30(1):24–36, 13p
Tomovic CL, Ncube LB, Walton A, Grieves M (2010) Development of product lifecycle management metrics: measuring the impact of PLM. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 19(3–4):167–179
Tsai M, Tsai C (2010) Innovation capability and performance in Taiwanese science parks: exploring the moderating effects of industrial clusters fabric. Int J Organ Innov 2:80–103
Tsai Y, Lin JY, Kurekova L (2009) Innovative R&D and optimal investment under uncertainty in high-tech industries: an implication for emerging economies. Res Policy 38:1388–1395
Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manage Rev 38:8–30
Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656
Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss JG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad Manage J 51(1):147–164
Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):31–51
Woertera M, Roper S (2010) Openness and innovation—home and export demand effects on manufacturing innovation: panel data evidence for Ireland and Switzerland. Res Policy 39(1):155–164
Yam RC, Lo W, Tang EP, Lau AK (2011) Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Res Policy 40:391–402
Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility and product innovation. Strateg Manage J 31:547–561
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aniruddha (2013). Innovation Objectives, Strategies and Firm Performance: A Study of Emerging Market Firms. In: Mukhopadhyay, C., et al. Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0746-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0745-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0746-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)