Abstract
Before the currency crisis, Malaysia was considered the best “development success story” among the second-tier newly industrializing economies in East Asia. From 1987 to 1996, the Malaysian economy grew at an average annual rate of 9 %, several times faster than the economies of the USA and many other Western industrialized nations. The economy was virtually at full employment for the last 6 years before the crisis, with modest inflation, rapid export growth, manageable external debt, and improvement in current account deficits. However, this impressive growth changed dramatically with the onset of the currency crisis. Economic growth contracted in 1998. Nevertheless, the economy showed some recovery, with an economic growth rate of 3–4 % for 1999–2001. The Malaysian government has made much effort to help the economy recover, such as a monetary policy that aims to promote monetary stability and sufficient liquidity in the economy, keeping inflation rates low, and maintaining the exchange rate at a stable level owing to the pegging to the US dollar. The external sector also had a good surplus, and the stock market has performed steadily in the past several years. As a result, Malaysian real GDP grew at an accelerated pace of 6–8 % from 2003 to 2010. It is the aim of this study to find out the role of macroeconomic fundamentals in Malaysian postrecession growth. The macroeconomic variables selected are exports, imports, price level, money supply, interest rate, exchange rate, and government expenditure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
3 The sample period was chosen as such for two reasons. First, Malaysia had pegged its exchange rate at RM 3.80 to the US dollar from 1 September 1998. Second, the Malaysian economy experienced contraction in 1998 and the economy had shown some recovery in 1999. Therefore, the third quarter of 1998 is an appropriate date to consider as a starting period for the post recession period.
- 4.
4 This is to correct for bias toward finding evidence for co-integration in a finite or small sample.
- 5.
5 The negative coefficient between money supply and economic growth tends to suggest that an increase in money supply would depress economic growth, which is contradictory to the theory; however, it is not statistically significant.
References
Ahmad, J., & Harnhirun, S. (1996). Co-integration and causality between exports and economic growth: Evidence from the ASEAN countries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29, 413–416.
Awokuse, T. (2007). Causality between exports, imports, and economic growth: Evidence from transition economies. Economics Letters, 94, 389–395.
Barro, R. (1995). Inflation and economic growth (NBER Working Paper, No: 5326). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barro, R., & Martin, X. (1992). Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 645–661.
Bengali, K., Khan, A., & Sadaqat, M. (1999). Money, income, prices and causality: The Pakistani experience. Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 503–514.
Chen, Y., & Hsing, Yu. (2005). The financial implications of a VAR model of the determinants of exchange rates: The case of South Korea. International Journal of Management, 22, 332–342.
Cooray, A. (2009). Government expenditure, government and economic growth. Comparative Economic Studies, 51, 401–418.
Craigwell, R. (1990). Interest rate policies, financial and economic growth in Barbados: 1973–1986. Money Affairs, 3, 69–80.
Das, S. (2003). Modeling money, price and output in India: A vector autoregressive and moving average (VARMA) approach. Applied Economics, 35, 1219–1225.
DeGregorio, J. (1993). Inflation, taxation and long-run growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31, 271–298.
Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057–1072.
Doraisami, A. (1996). Export growth and economic growth: A re-examination of some time-series evidence of the Malaysian experience. The Journal of Developing Areas, 30, 223–230.
Erbaykal, E., & Okuyan, A. (2008). Does inflation depress economic growth? Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 17, 40–48.
Fischer, S. (1991). Growth, macroeconomics and development (NBER Working Paper 3702). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Fischer, S. (1993).The role of macroeconomic factors in growth (NBER Working Paper 4565). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Folster, S., & Henrekson, M. (2001). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45, 1501–1520.
Ghatak, S., Milner, C., & Utkulu, U. (1997). Exports, export composition and growth: Co-integration and causality evidence for Malaysia. Applied Economics, 29, 213–223.
Ghirmay, T., Grabowski, R., & Sharma, S. (2001). Exports, investment, efficiency and economic growth in LDC: An empirical investigation. Applied Economics, 33, 689–700.
Ghosh, S., & Gragorious, A. (2008). The composition of government spending and growth: Is current or capital spending better? Oxford Economic Papers, 60, 484–516.
Gomme, P. (1993). Money and growth revisited: Measuring the costs of inflation in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 51–77.
Guerrero, F. (2006). Does inflation cause poor long-term growth performance? Japan and The World Economy, 18, 72–89.
Gylfason, T., & Herbertsson, T. T. (2001). Does inflation matter for growth? Japan and The World Economy, 13, 405–428.
Hurlin, C. (2004). Testing granger causality in heterogeneous panel data models with fixed coefficients, mimeo. University of Orléans.
Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of co-integration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1992). Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate co-integration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 211–244.
Khalafalla, K. Y., & Webb, A. (2001). Export-led growth and structural change: Evidence from Malaysia. Applied Economics, 33, 1703–1715.
Khan, A. H., & Siddiqui, A. N. (1990). Money, prices and economic activity in Pakistan: A test of causal relation. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 28, 121–136.
Kneller, R., Bleaney, M., & Gemmel, N. (1998). Growth, public policy and the government budget constraint: Evidence from OECD countries (Discussion papers in economics 98/14). University of Nottingham.
Koccat, H. (2008). Exchange rates, exports and economic growth in Turkey: Evidence from Johansen co-integration tests. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 5–11.
Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Beatrice, Y., & Mansur, K. (2010). Determinant factors of economic growth in Malaysia: Multivariate co-integration and causality analysis. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 24, 123–137.
Kormandi, R., & Meguire, P. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141–163.
Lee, J. W., Baimukhamedova, G., & Akhmetova, S. (2010). Foreign direct investment, exchange rate, and their roles in economic growth of developing countries: Empirical evidence from Kazakhstan. Journal of International Business Researcher, 9, 75–90.
Liwan, A., & Lau, E. (2007). Managing growth: The role of export, inflation and investment in three ASEAN neighboring countries. ICFAI Journal of Managerial Economics, 5, 7–16.
Mallick, H., & Agarwal, S. (2007). Impact of real interest rates on real output growth In India: A long-run analysis in a liberalized financial regime. Singapore Economic Review, 52, 215–231.
Mallik, G., & Chowdhury, A. (2001). Inflation and economic growth: Evidence from four south Asian countries. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 8, 123–135.
Marwah, K., & Tavakoli, A. (2004). The effect of foreign capital and imports on economic growth: Further evidence from four Asian countries (1970–1998). Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 399–413.
Miles, W. (2008). Exchange rates, inflation and growth in small, open economies: A difference-in-differences approach. Applied Economics, 40, 341–348.
Mishra, P. K., Mishra, U. S., & Mishra, S. K. (2010). Money, price and output: A causality test for India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue, 53, 26–36.
Okpara, G., & Nwaoha, W. (2010). Government expenditure, money supply, prices and output relationship in Nigeria: An econometric analysis. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 54, 125–133.
Olayeni, O. R. (2009). A bayesian analysis of government expenditure in Nigeria. MPRA paper No. 18244. Germany: The Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich University Library.
Olukayode, E. M., & Onabanjo, U. O. (2009). Does government spending spur economic growth in Nigeria? MPRA paper No. 17941. Germany: The Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich University Library.
Omoke, C., & Ugwuanyi, U. (2010). Money price and output: A causality test for Nigeria. American Journal of Scientific Research, 8, 78–87.
Pesaran, H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.
Reinsel, G., & Ahn, S. (1992). Vector autoregressive models with unit roots and reduced rank structure: Estimation, likelihood ratio tests, and forecasting. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 13, 353–375.
Suleman, M., Wasti, K., Lai, I., & Adnan, H. (2009). An empirical investigation between money supply government expenditure, output & prices: The Pakistan evidence. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 17, 60–68.
Tan, K. G., & Cheng, C. S. (1995). The causal nexus of money, output and prices in Malaysia. Applied Economics, 27, 1245–1251.
Tan, B. W., & Lean, H. H. (2010). An analysis of dynamic linkages between domestic investment, exports and growth in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16, 150–159.
Taylor, M. (1999). Real interest rates and macroeconomic activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15, 95–113.
Toda, H., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated process. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225–250.
Valdovinoz, F. (2003). Inflation and economic growth in the long run. Economic Letters, 80, 167–173.
Wang, Y., Hui, X., & Soofi, A. (2007). Estimating renminbi equilibrium exchange rate. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 417–429.
Warman, F., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1994). Interest rates, saving, investment and growth in Mexico 1960-90: Tests of the financial liberalization hypothesis. Journal of Development Studies, 30, 629–649.
Wu, S. Y., Tang, J., & Lin, E. S. (2010). The impact of government expenditure on economic growth: How sensitive to the level of development? Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 804–817.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India Pvt. Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chin, L. (2013). The Role of Macroeconomic Fundamentals in Malaysian Post Recession Growth. In: Verma, N. (eds) Recession and Its Aftermath. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0532-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0532-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0531-9
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0532-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)