Skip to main content

The Financial Crisis and the Great Recession in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recession and Its Aftermath

Abstract

The Great Recession in the USA began in December 2007. When it formally ended 18 months later (June 2009), it proved to be the longest economic contraction since the Great Depression. The 16-month recessions of 1973–1975 and 1981–1983, although close in duration to this Great Recession, did not parallel the severe financial crisis of the kind the USA experienced throughout 2008. The federal government’s refusal to rescue the collapsing investment giant Lehman Brothers in September 2008 heightened the level of uncertainty regarding the depth and duration of the new recession, which in turn led to a freezing of the credit market. Giant financial institutions such as Citigroup, Bank of America, and American International Group (AIG) were in imminent danger of insolvency. Within 2 years, a significant gap (8 %) opened between the economy’s potential and actual output despite efforts of the monetary and fiscal policymakers to reverse the decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 See Blinder and Zandi (2010).

  2. 2.

    2 Feller and Stone (2009) use the Piketty-Saez (2003) results to calculate the numbers for 2002–2007.

  3. 3.

    3 See his presentation at the American Economic Association Annual Conference, Denver, January 7, 2011 which was based on http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/6348. See many blog posts from Krugman on inequality and (lack of) social mobility, including http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/22/inequality-denial/ and http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/income-and-consumption-inequality/.

  4. 4.

    4 See USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/housing/2006-01-17-real-estate-usat_x.htm.

  5. 5.

    5 While banks played this strategy everywhere, for their tricks on California’s government see http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Wall_Street_Bets_on_Cities_and_States_Failing_100427.

  6. 6.

    6 See Caballero (2010), Hall (2010), and Woodford (2010) for a review of the efforts to address such weakness and where research needs to go further to make significant progress in this direction.

  7. 7.

    7 See Krugman (2009b).

  8. 8.

    8 See http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/multiplying-multipliers/

  9. 9.

    9 Christiano et al. (2009) find that “If it [government spending] comes on line in future periods when the nominal interest rate is zero then there is a large effect on current output. If it comes on line in future periods where the nominal interest rate is positive, then the current effect on government spending is smaller.”

  10. 10.

    10 See an interesting discussion on how Say had later changed his view, in deLong (2009a).

  11. 11.

    11 See Valletta and Kuang (2010).

  12. 12.

    12 Krugman (2009b), “So, it’s an amazing thing: Obama and company have managed to convince people that big government failed, without actually delivering big government.”

  13. 13.

    13 Also see papers from a “Symposium on the Financial Crisis and the Teaching of Macroeconomics,” published by the Journal of Economic Education, Fall 2010.

  14. 14.

    14 Simon Johnson nicely relates the disastrous failure of regulation to the theory of regulatory capture first advanced in 1971 by the conservative economist George Stigler in his “The Theory of Economic Regulation”. See Bill Moyers’ interview with Kwak and Johnson: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2010/04/financial_regulation_regulator.html. The theory says that individuals or corporations who are directly affected by a policy decision will devote a great deal of resources to achieve their preferred policy outcomes while general public will ignore it. Regulatory capture occurs when the groups seeking desired (or diluted) regulation succeed in their efforts. The theory seems highly relevant in explaining the evolution of regulatory regime during the decade leading up to the recent crisis.

  15. 15.

    15 Akerlof and Shiller (2009) analyze the substantial effect of psychology behind animal spirits of investors that they claim can engender a crisis of the magnitude the world has just seen.

  16. 16.

    16 Kumhof and Ranciere (2010): In 1983, the top 5% exhibited a debt to income ratio of 80% and the bottom 95% a ratio of 60%. Twenty five years later, the situation is dramatically reversed with a ratio of 65% for the top 5% and of 140% for the bottom 95%. (Voxeu.org article, “Inequality, leverage, and crises,” February 4, 2011).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukti Upadhyay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India Pvt. Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Upadhyay, M., Mason, T. (2013). The Financial Crisis and the Great Recession in the United States. In: Verma, N. (eds) Recession and Its Aftermath. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0532-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics