Abstract
This project aimed to better understand the possibilities and limitations of an artificial pedagogical agent. For example, could an agent be programmed into a robot or a computer to teach? If so, how should such an agent be designed? To answer these questions, we used an approach that integrated developmental cognitive science, information technology, and field studies in educational setting. This chapter discusses the results of our research to date and the outlook for the future development of pedagogical machines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
G. Csibra, G. Gergely, Natural pedagogy. Trends Cognit. Sci. 13, 148–153 (2009)
T.M. Caro, M.D. Hauser, Is there teaching in nonhumananimals? Quart. Rev. Biol. 67, 151–174 (1992)
A. Thornton, K. McAuliffe, Teaching in wild meerkats. Science 313, 227–229 (2006)
G. Csibra, Teachers in the wild. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 95–96 (2007)
P.K. Kuhl, F. Tsao, H. Liu, Foreign-language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 9096–9101 (2003). USA
T. Grossmann, M.H. Johnson, The development of the social brain in human infancy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 909–919 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05379.x
M. Tomasello, M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, H. Moll, Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 675–735 (2005). doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000129
M. Morales, P. Mundy, C.E.F. Delgado, M. Yale, D. Messinger, R. Neal, H.K. Schwartz, Responding to joint attention across the 6-through 24-month age period and early language acquisition. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 21, 283–298 (2000). doi:10.1016/s0193-3973(99)00040-4
M. Tomasello, The social bases of language acquisition. Soc. Dev. 1(1), 67–87 (1992)
M. Krcmar, B. Grela, K. Lin, Can toddlers learn vocabulary from television? An experimental approach. Media Psychol. 10, 41–63 (2007). doi:10.1080/15213260701375652
D.R. Anderson, T.A. Pempek, Television and very young children. Am. Behav. Sci. 48, 505–522 (2005). doi:10.1177/0002764204271506
S. Shimada, K. Hiraki, Infant’s brain responses to live and televised action. Neuroimage 32(2), 930–939 (2006)
M.H. Goldstein, J.A. Schwade, Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychol. Sci. 19(5), 515–523 (2008)
M. Nielsen, G. Simcock, L. Jenkins, The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Dev. Sci. 11, 722–731 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00722.x
S. Roseberry, K. Hirsh-Pasek, R.M. Golinkoff, Skype me! socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Dev. 85(3), 956–970 (2014)
G.L. Troseth, M.M. Saylor, A.H. Archer, Young children’s use of video as a source of socially relevant information. Child Dev. 77, 786–799 (2006)
C.S. Tamis-LeMonda, Y. Kuchirko, L. Song, Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23(2), 121–126 (2014)
T. Striano, A. Henning, D. Stahl, Sensitivity to interpersonal timing at 3 and 6 months of age. Interact. Stud. 7(2), 251–271 (2006)
N.A. Smith, L.J. Trainor, Infant-directed speech is modulated by infant feedback. Infancy 13(4), 410–420 (2008)
R.J. Brand, D.A. Baldwin, L.A. Ashburn, Evidence for ‘motionese’: modifications in mothers’ infant-directed action. Dev. Sci. 5(1), 72–83 (2002)
M. Miyazaki, K. Hiraki, Delayed intermodal contingency affects young children’s recognition of their current self. Child Dev. 77(3), 736–750 (2006)
W.S. Millar, J.S. Watson, Effect of delayed feedback on infant learning reexamined. Child Dev. 50(3), 747–751 (1979)
L.E. Bahrick, J.S. Watson, Detection of intermodal proprioceptive visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Dev. Psychol. 21(6), 963–973 (1985)
R. Moreno, R.E. Mayer, H.A. Spires, J.C. Lester, The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cogn. Instr. 19, 177–213 (2001)
A.L. Baylor, S. Kim, Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: when less is more. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 450–457 (2009)
R.E. Mayer, C.S. DaPra, An embodiment e ect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18, 239–252 (2012)
R.K. Atkinson, R.E. Mayer, M.M. Merrill, Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 30, 117–139 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001
K. Shockley, M.V. Santana, C.A. Fowler, Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 326–332 (2003)
D.C. Richardson, R. Dale, N.Z. Kirkham, The art of conversation is coordination-common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychol. Sci. 18, 407–413 (2007)
N.J. Emery, The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 581–604 (2000)
M. Morales, P. Mundy, C.E.F. Delgado, M. Yale, D. Messinger, R. Neal, H.K. Schwartz, Responding to joint attention across the 6-through 24-month age period and early language acquisition. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 21, 283–298 (2000)
R. Brooks, A.N. Meltzoff, The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Dev. Sci. 8, 535–543 (2005)
T. Striano, X. Chen, A. Cleveland, S. Bradshaw, Joint attention social cues influence infant learning. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 3, 289–299 (2006)
A. Senju, G. Csibra, Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr. Biol. 18, 239–252 (2008)
Y. Okumura, Y. Kanakogi, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, S. Itakura, The power of human gaze on infant learning. Cognition 128, 127–133 (2013)
S. D’Mello, A. Olney, C. Williams, P. Hays, Gaze tutor: a gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70, 377–398 (2012)
L. Schilbach, M. Wilms, S.B. Eickho, S. Romanzetti, R. Tepest, G. Bente, N.J. Shah, G.R. Fink, K. Vogeley, Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2702–2715 (2010)
M. Tomasello, M.J. Farrar, Joint attention and early language. Child Dev. 57, 1454–1463 (1986)
J. Blascovich, J. Loomis, A.C. Beall, K.R. Swinth, C.L. Hoyt, J.N. Bailenson, Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol. Inq. 13, 103–124 (2002)
M. Krcmar, B. Grela, K. Lin, Can toddlers learn vocabulary from television? an experimental approach. Media Psychol. 10, 41–63 (2007)
M. Krcmar, Can social meaningfulness and repeat exposure help infants and toddlers overcome the video de cit? Media Psychol. 13, 31–53 (2010)
K.W. Lau, H.K. Tan, B.T. Erwin, P. Petrovic, Creative learning in school with LEGO (R) programmable robotics products, in 29th Annual 1999 FIE’99 Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 2, pp. 12D4-26 (1999)
P. Mosley, R. Kline, Engaging students: a framework using LEGO robotics to teach problem solving. J. Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. 24(1), 39 (2006)
M. Cooper, D. Keating, W. Harwin, K. Dautenhahn, Robots in the classroom: tools for accessible education, in Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the New Millennium, ed. by C. Buhler, H. Knops (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999), pp. 448–452
F. Tanaka, J.R. Movellan, B. Fortenberry, K. Aisaka, Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments, in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, ACM, pp. 3–9 March 2006
F. Tanaka, A. Cicourel, J.R. Movellan, Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(46), 17954–17958 (2007)
M. Fridin, Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: a tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Comput. Educ. 70, 53–64 (2014)
C.W. Chang, J.H. Lee, P.Y. Chao, C.Y. Wang, G.D. Chen, Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(2), 13–24 (2010)
F. Warneken, M. Tomasello, Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311, 1301–1303 (2006)
E. Yamamoto, G. Matsuda, K. Nagata, D. Naoko, K. Hiraki, Subtle temporal delays on mothers’ responses affect imitation learning in children: mother-child interaction study. (submitted)
H. Lee, Y. Kanakogi, K. Hiraki, Building a responsive teacher: how temporally contingent gaze interaction influences word learning with virtual tutors. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 140361 (2015)
H. Okazaki, Y. Kanai, M. Ogata, K. Hasegawa, K. Ishii, M. Imai, Toward understanding pedagogical relationship in human-robot interaction. J. Robot. Mechatron. 28(1), 69–78 (2016)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by CREST, JST. I would like to thank all children and mothers who participated in our experimental studies. This project has been conducted with the following members, Michita Imai (Keio University), Akiko Hayashi (Tokyo Gakugei University), Shinta Kimura (Animo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Japan KK
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hiraki, K. (2017). Pedagogical Machine: Studies Towards a Machine that Teaches Humans. In: Nishida, T. (eds) Human-Harmonized Information Technology, Volume 2. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56535-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56535-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56533-8
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-56535-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)