Abstract
Land and Water resources form the base for development and utilization of other resources. The depletion and degradation of these resources has happened at a very fast pace in developing countries like India. Many resource development programmes have been undertaken in India to tackle the problem of land and water resources and have been applied generally on watershed basis. Thus, prioritization is essential for proper planning and management of natural resources for sustainable development. Mountain watersheds have attracted global concern due to the threat of serious environmental and socio-economic implications arising from natural resource degradation. Increasing recreational pressures within the mountains, demand for hydro-power, and increasing climatic variability are major concerns of present time Himalayas. Therefore, the basic objective of the prioritization of watersheds is proper management in the most vulnerable parts of the watershed so as to minimize the siltation rate in the active stream or reservoirs. The study area of Swan catchment falls under Una district. The river Swan has a total catchment of 140,000 ha out of which 120,000 (85.7 %) ha lies in the Himachal Pradesh. The river is fed by about 82 tributaries during its traverse in Himachal Pradesh. In district Una, river Swan flows through inter-mountainous valley. The study has used both primary and secondary databases. In the present study, the parameters considered for prioritization of watershed were from the natural resources thematic map data, including soil, drainage density, surface water prospects, groundwater prospects, irrigated area, forest cover and Land use land cover derived from satellite imagery and socio-economic data. In the present study, weightage system has been adopted for sub-watershed prioritization based on its factors and after carefully observing the field situation. The basis for assigning weightage to different themes was according to the relative importance to each parameter in the study area. The weightage system adopted here is completely dependent on local terrain and may vary from place to place. The prioritization results of study shows that 4 sub-watersheds SWL36, SWL6, SWR54, and SWR69 need very high priority, 29 sub-watersheds need high priority, 16 sub-watersheds fall in medium priority and 32 sub-watersheds fall in very low and Low priority.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR (1999) Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin, District Midnapore, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 27(3):155–166
Dashefsky HS (1993) Environmental literacy: everything you need to know about saving our planet. Random House, New York
Gleick PH (2002) The World’s water: 2002–2003. A biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, Washington, DC
Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54
Liniger HP, Weingartner R, Grosjean M (1998) Mountains of the World: water towers for the 21st century. Report for the UN Commission on Sustainable Development, CSD session strategic approaches to freshwater management. Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern
Mittal SP, Aggarwal RK (2002) Management of land and water resources with peoples participation in Shivalik Foothills of Northern India. 12th international symposium on soil conservation organization, Beijing
Moore ID, Burch GJ (1977) Physical basis of the length slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am 50(5):1294–1298
Paehlke R (1995) Carrying capacity. Conservation and environmentalism: an encyclopedia. Garland Publication, New York, pp 11–110
Schindler DW (2001) The cumulative effects of climate warming and other human stresses on Canadian freshwaters in the new millennium. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58(1):18–29
Smil V (2001) Feeding the world: a challenge for the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge
Swami VA, Kulkarni SS (2011) Watershed management – a means of sustainable development – a case study. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3:2105–2112
Swan River Integrated Watershed Management Project (SRIWMP) (2014) Study on impact assessment of soil and water conservation measures implemented in Swan Catchment, Una, Himachal Pradesh. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Dehradun
Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH (2008) Prioritization of sub-watersheds for sustainable development and management of natural resources: an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and socio-economic data. Curr Sci 95(3):345–354
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this paper
Cite this paper
Batar, A.K., Singh, R.B., Kumar, A. (2016). Prioritizing Watersheds for Sustainable Development in Swan Catchment Area, Himachal Pradesh, India. In: Singh, R., Prokop, P. (eds) Environmental Geography of South Asia. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55741-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55741-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55740-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55741-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)