Abstract
Cities are increasingly garnering attention on the global political stage, in light of the challenges and opportunities urbanization engenders for transition along sustainability and resilience pathways. Recently adopted as a target for change within sustainable development agendas, and recognized as central socioeconomic vehicles by which to mobilize related initiatives, the significance of urban systems to transition becomes most evident if we conceptualize them as being integrated within broader systems of settlements. Settlements are complex adaptive socio-ecological systems, which together as globalized networks embody the complete range of human-environment interactions and the complexity that has emerged along with these, over time. This framing is inspired by science of cities research and the dwelling perspective, both of which have elaborated on cities/settlements’ (1) coupled social-ecological-technological phenomena, (2) fundamental nature and function, (3) embodiment of scale-/network-based processes, and (4) emergent, multi-scale patterns of organization and impact. Ultimately, this could inform a relational approach to both sustainability and settlement planning, guided by analyses of these factors. It could also complement the burgeoning inclination in science and design disciplines to deconstruct the reflexive interactions that can occur between processes and forms, meaning and matter, people and places, the ephemeral and the concrete, the normative and the positive. By this means, we begin to invert our systemic design problem space, turning attention away from our constructed worlds, instead contemplating the ways of life they enable, in an integration between research and practice, observation and intervention, analyses and innovation, scholarship and poetics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sustainability: This term was sanctified in the Brundtland Commission’s report, Our Common Future, wherein sustainable development has been defined as that which “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland, <CitationRef CitationID="CR34" >1987</Citation Ref>). Or as Gibson (<CitationRef CitationID="CR79" >2016</Citation Ref>) has summarized, more recently, “We can begin by treating sustainability as current language for lasting wellbeing and exploring what pursuing lasting wellbeing entails” (p. 3).
- 2.
Resilience: “The capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change so as to still retain essentially the same function, structure and feedbacks, and therefore identity…” (Folke et al., <CitationRef CitationID="CR74" >2010</Citation Ref>, p. 20).
- 3.
Transition: “A transition is a radical, structural change of a societal (sub)system that is the result of a coevolution of economic, cultural, technological, ecological, and institutional developments at different scale levels” (Rotmans & Loorbach, <CitationRef CitationID="CR174" >2009</Citation Ref>, p. 185).
- 4.
Socio-ecological Systems: “The evolving world system can be considered a socio-ecological system, comprised of environmental and human subsystems and their interactions. The environmental subsystem, in turn, is composed of ecosystems, biophysical processes and other aspects of the natural world. The economic system includes capital, labor, other inputs, and the production processes in which they are used. The social subsystem includes consumption patterns, demographics, and culture” (Gallopín & Raskin, <CitationRef CitationID="CR76" >2002</Citation Ref>, p. 5–6).
- 5.
Adjacent Possible: “The adjacent possible is a kind of shadow future, hovering on the edges of the present state of things, a map of all the ways in which the present can reinvent itself” (Johnson, <CitationRef CitationID="CR231" >2010</Citation Ref>, p. 31).
- 6.
The first saw the rise of ancient civilizations around 10,000 B.C.; the second began around 1800 A.D., coinciding with the industrial revolution; and the third began in 2010, at which point 50% of global populations were living in urban regions (Angel, <CitationRef CitationID="CR5" >2012</Citation Ref>).
- 7.
Goal 11, Sustainable Cities and Communities: “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” (United Nations, <CitationRef CitationID="CR205" >2015b</Citation Ref>, p. 14).
- 8.
Extended Peer Communities “[consist] not merely of persons with some form or other of institutional accreditation [such as scientists, industry or government], but rather of all those with a desire to participate in the resolution of the issue” (Funtowicz & Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR228" >2003</Citation Ref>, p. 7).
- 9.
Post-Normal Science decision-making conditions combine high uncertainty with high stakes, sit at the intersection of policy and science, require evaluation of both fact and value statements, and are often embedded within complex scenarios (Funtowicz & Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR228" >2003</Citation Ref>; Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR164" >2007</Citation Ref>).
- 10.
Critical Transitions occur when a system shifts from one state (i.e. basin of attraction) to another (also referred to as crossing a threshold) and without prospect of returning easily to its previous state (Scheffer, <CitationRef CitationID="CR183" >2009</Citation Ref>; Walker & Salt, <CitationRef CitationID="CR210" >2006</Citation Ref>).
- 11.
In urbanized, globalized contexts, we have even redefined the meaning of a nomadic lifestyle. Today, we can live a life on the road, supported by transnational banking, international transit, digital communication, and otherwise.
- 12.
“Ekistics denotes both a specific settlement orientation and at the same time a wide field of interest, encompassing all those processes which have served to form settlements throughout history” (Bell & Tyrwhitt, <CitationRef CitationID="CR19" >1972</Citation Ref>, p. 28).
- 13.
Five Principles of Settlement: (1) maximization of man’s potential contacts with the elements of nature, with people, and with the works of man; (2) minimization of the effort required for the achievement of man’s actual and potential contacts; (3) optimization of man’s protective space, which means the selection of such a distance from other persons, animals, or objects that he can keep his contacts with them without any kind of sensory or psychological discomfort; (4) optimization of the quality of man’s relationship with his environment, which consists of nature, society, shells, and networks; and (5) optimization of the four other principles, dependent on time and space, actual conditions, and man’s ability to create a synthesis (Doxiadis, <CitationRef CitationID="CR61" >1970</Citation Ref>, pp. 2–3).
- 14.
Systems of Cities: “What we call systems of cities are evolutionary objects that may include subsets of cities connected by long-distance networks or cities belonging to unified political territories…The precise identification of systems of cities is very difficult, due to the changing nature of the interactions that need to be considered, and the fluctuations in their spatial extension” (Bretagnolle et al., <CitationRef CitationID="CR30" >2009</Citation Ref>, p. 200).
- 15.
Global Cities: This concept refers to a type of function, situated within complex cities, involving the production of advanced intermediary services (i.e. finance, legal, trade, etc.), that facilitate cross-border exchanges and globalized activities (Sassen, 2012).
- 16.
Design Space: The total set of prospective designs that could be rendered (Beinhocker, <CitationRef CitationID="CR002" >2011</Citation Ref>).
- 17.
Ideal Type: In this method of analysis, a model exemplar of a given social or cultural phenomenon is identified, against which other instances can be compared and connected. Sociologist and political economist Max Weber analysed cities in this way, wherein he illustrated how those arising within very different times and places could be related through their shared characteristics, as opposed to generalized laws (Portugali, <CitationRef CitationID="CR156" >2000</Citation Ref>).
- 18.
Form is the physical embodiment of a system’s pattern of organization; matter is the material structure of a system; the process of life is the activity involved in the continual embodiment of the system’s pattern of organization; meaning is the inner world of reflective consciousness (derived from Capra & Luisi, <CitationRef CitationID="CR39" >2014</Citation Ref>, pp. 303–304).
- 19.
Emergy “...is the available energy of one kind previously used up directly and indirectly to make a product or service” (Odum, <CitationRef CitationID="CR149" >2007</Citation Ref>, p. 89).
- 20.
Third Industrial Revolution: This current regime shift represents the implications of information technology on production, operational management, and distribution (Rifkin, <CitationRef CitationID="CR170" >2011</Citation Ref>).
- 21.
Personal communication with William Rees, Canadian Society for Ecological Economics Conference, October 4, 2015, Vancouver.
References
Abdel-Rahman, H. M., & Anas, A. (2003). Theories of systems of cities. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics (Vol. 4, 1st ed., pp. 2293–2339). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alexander, C. (2002–2005). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe (Books 1–4). Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.
Allen, P. (2012). Cities: The visible expression of co-evolving complexity. In J. Portugali (Ed.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 67–89). New York: Springer. [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].
Allen, R. (Ed.). (2006). The Penguin complete English dictionary. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Angel, S. (2012). Planet of cities. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Architecture for Humanity. (2012). Design like you give a damn [2]: Building change from the ground up. New York: Abrams.
Arthur, B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bairoch, P. (1988). Cities and economic development: From the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1992). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Batty, M. (2013a). The new science of cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Batty, M. (2013b). A theory of city size. Science, 340(6139), 1418–1419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239870
Batty, M. (2013c). Big data, smart cities, and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390
Batty, M. (2014). Great planning disasters. In M. Tewdwr-Jones, N. A. Phelps, & R. Freestone (Eds.), The planning imagination: Peter hall and the study of urban and regional planning. New York: Routledge.
Batty, M., & Marshall, S. (2012). The origins of complexity theory in cities and planning. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 21–45). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of biophilic city planning and design. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328
Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Beddoe, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Garza, E., Kent, J., Kubiszewski, I. et al. (2009). Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(8), 2483–2489. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org_cgi_doi_10.1073_pnas.0812570106
Beesley, P. (2017, May 16–17). New sentient architecture. Living on the precipice: Interdisciplinary conference on resilience in complex natural and human systems, Waterloo, ON, The University of Waterloo.
Beinhocker, E. D. (2011). Evolution as computation: Integrating self-organization with generalized Darwinism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 393–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137411000257
Bell, G., & Tyrwhitt, J. (1972). Human identity in the urban environment. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature (1st ed.). New York: Morrow.
Berger, W. (2009). Glimmer: How design can transform your world. Toronto, ON: Random House Canada.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Link].
Bettencourt, L. (2013a). The origins of scaling in cities. Science, 340(6139), 1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235823
Bettencourt, L. (2013b). The kind of problem a city is. SFI Working Paper #2013-03-008
Bettencourt, L. (2014). The uses of big data in cities. Big Data, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.0042
Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467(7318), 912–913. https://doi.org/10.1038/467912a
Biron, C. L. (2016). The worldwide effort to shape sustainable urban development. City Lab. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/environment/2016/07/cities-turn-to-implementing-the-sustainable-development-goals/490490/
Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2008). Urbanization and the wealth of nations. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 319(5864), 772–775. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/20053315
Botsman, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption (1st ed.). New York: Harper Business.
Bretagnolle, A., Pumain, D., & Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C. (2009). The organization of urban systems. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 197–220). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].
Bromell, L., & Cagney, K. A. (2015). Companionship in the neighborhood context: Older adults’ living arrangements and perceptions of social cohesion. Res Aging, 36(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027512475096
Brown, P. G., & Garver, G. (2009). Right relationship: Building a whole earth economy. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation (1st ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future (The Brundtland Report). Medicine, Conflict and Survival (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.
Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections: Integrating the biological, cognitive, and social dimensions of life into a science of sustainability. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Castells, M. (2006). Cities, the informational society and the global economy. In N. Brenner & R. Keil (Eds.), The global cities reader (pp. 135–136). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1993).
Castells, M. (2008). The networked city. In G. Pflieger, L. Pattaroni, C. Jemelin, & V. Kaufmann (Eds.), The social fabric of the networked city (pp. v–xiii). Abingdon, UK: EPFL Press.
Castells, M. (2010a). Globalisation, networking, urbanisation: Reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2737–2745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377365
Castells, M. (2010b). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. Town Planning Review, 21(1), 3-17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/40102108
Ching, F., Jarzombek, M., & Vikramaditya, P. (2011). A global history of architecture (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Christian, D. (2004). Maps of time: An introduction to big history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cilliers, P. (2007). Making sense of a complex world. In M. Aaltonen (Ed.), The third lens: Multi-ontology sensemaking and strategic decision making (pp. 99–110). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Condon, P. (2010). Seven rules for sustainable communities: Design strategies for a post-carbon world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Cooke, B., West, S., & Boonstra, W. J. (2016). Dwelling in the biosphere: Exploring an embodied human-environment connection in resilience thinking. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0367-3
Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer. [E-book, Springer Link].
Cumming, G. S., & Norberg, J. (2008). Scale and complex systems. In J. Norberg & G. S. Cumming (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 246–276). New York: Columbia University Press.
Curran, D. (2009). Wicked. Alternatives Journal, 35(5), 8–11. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/21222889?accountid=14906
Curran, D., & Tomalty, R. (2003). Living it up: The wide range of support for smart growth in Canada promises more livable towns and cities. Alternatives Journal, 29(3), 10+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA108007273&asid=4683cdec6b7f1f22b5ac1152bec27f04
Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Nature and society through the lens of resilience: Toward a human-in-ecosystem perspective. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 53–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Link].
de Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological complexity, 3(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
de Roo, G., & Rauws, W. S. (2012). Positioning planning in the world of order, chaos and complexity: On perspectives, behavior and interventions in a non-linear environment. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 6207–6220). New York: Springer [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].
de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism succeeds in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.
de Vries, B., & Goudsblom, J. (Eds.). (2002). Mappae mundi: Humans and their habitats in a long-term ecological perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Diamond, J. (2005a). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Diamond, J. (2005b). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.
Doxiadis, C. A. (1969). The city (II): Ecumenopolis, world-city of tomorrow. Impact of Science on Society, 19(2), 179-193. Retrieved from http://www.doxiadis.org/Downloads/the_city_ecumenopolis.pdf
Doxiadis, C. A. (1970). Ekistics, the science of human settlements. Science, 170(3956), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3956.393
Doxiadis, C. A. (1974). Anthropolis: City for human development. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.
Duhl, L. (1996). An ecohistory of health: The role of ‘healthy cities’. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 258–261. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.258
Duhl, L. (2005). Healthy cities and the built environment. Built Environment, 31(4), 356–361. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/10.2148/benv.2005.31.4.356
Dusch, B., Crilly, N., & Moultrie, J. (2010). Developing a framework for mapping sustainable design activities. Design Research Society Conference. Retrieved from http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/033.pdf
Edmonson, A. (2007). A Fuller explanation: The synergetic geometry of R. Buckminster Fuller. (Back-in-action edition). Pueblo, CO: Emergent World Press. Retrieved from https://buckyworld.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/afullerexplanation-by-amy-edmondson.pdf (Original work published 1987).
Ellard, C. (2015). Places of the heart: The psychogeography of everyday life. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.
Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (Eds.). (2013a). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (2013b). Stewardship of the biosphere in the urban era. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 719–746). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Elmqvist, T., Redman, C. L., Barthel, S., & Costanza, R. (2013). History of urbanization and the missing ecology. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 13–30). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Ernston, H., van der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., et al. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio, 39(8), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
Fernandes, E. (2002). The influence of de Soto’s ‘The Mystery of Capital’. Land Lines, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/lla020103.pdf
Florida, R. L. (2008). Who’s your city: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.
Florida, R. L. (2014, April 17). 11 reasons the UN should make cities the focus of its forthcoming sustainable development goals. The Atlantic City Lab. Retrieved from http://www.citylab.com/work/2014/04/11-reasons-un-should-make-cities-focus-its-new-sustainable-development-goals/8896/
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
Fragkias, M., Guneralp, B., Seto, K.C., & Goodness, J. (2013). A synthesis of global urbanization projections. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, … & C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 409–435) [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books]. New York: Springer.
Fuller, B. (1971). Nine chains to the moon. New York: Doubleday. (Original published 1938).
Fuller, B. (1981). Critical path (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Frampton, K. (1983). Toward a critical regionalism: Six points for an architecture of resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 16–30). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2003). Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, 1–10. Retrieved from http://isecoeco.org/pstnormsc.pdf
Gallopín, G. C., & Raskin, P. D. (2002). Global sustainability: Bending the curve. New York: Routledge/SEI Global Environment and Development Series. [E-Book, Taylor and Francis Group Link].
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147
Gibson, R. B. (2016). Sustainability assessment applications and opportunities. New York: Routledge. [E-Book, ProQuest Link].
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., et al. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. New Series, 319(5864), 756-760. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/20053310
Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hall, C., Tharakan, P., Cleveland, J., Hallock, C., & Jefferson, M. (2003). Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature, 426(6964), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02130
Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Hawken, P. (2004a). Forward. In K. Ausubel & J. P. Harpignies (Eds.), Nature’s operating instructions: The true biotechnologies (pp. vii–vix). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
Hawken, P. (2004b). Brother, can you spare a paradigm? In K. Ausubel & J. P. Harpignies (Eds.), Nature’s operating instructions: The true biotechnologies (pp. 147–160). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Building, dwelling, thinking. In M. Heidegger, Basic writings: From Being and Time (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell Ed. & Trans.) (Revised and expanded ed.) (pp. 343–363). San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco (Original work published 1971).
Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. (Original work published 1971).
Helbing, D. (2013). Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 497(7447), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047
Henderson, H. (1995). Paradigms in progress: Life beyond economics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Hobbs, J. R., Higgs, E. S., & Hall, C. M. (Eds.). (2013). Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hofstadter, A. (2001). Introduction. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.) (pp. ix–xxii). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics (Original work published 1971).
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405. Retrieved from http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/resolve/14329840/v04i0005/0390_utcoeeass.xml
Homer-Dixon, T. (2006). The upside of down: Catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Toronto, ON: Knopf.
Homer-Dixon, T., Walker, B., Biggs, R., Crépin, A. S., Folke, C., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2015). Synchronous failure: The emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07681-200306
Honoré, C. (2004). In praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed. Toronto, ON: Vintage Canada.
Hopkins, R. (2011). The transition companion: Making your community more resilient in uncertain times. Cambridge, UK: Green Books.
Hysler-Rubin, N. (2011). Patrick Geddes and town planning: A critical view. New York: Routledge.
IDEO. (2015). The field guide to human-centred design. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org/resources/1
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Ingold, T. (2005). Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation Society, 3(2), 501–508. Retrieved from http://www.conservationandsociety.org/text.asp?2005/3/2/501/49324
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
James, S., & Lahti, T. (2004). The natural step for communities: How cities and towns can change to sustainable practices. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Jervis, R. (1997). Complex systems: The role of interactions. In D. S. Alberts & T. J. Czerwinski (Eds.), Complexity, global politics, and national security (pp. 20–31). Washington, DC: National Defense University.
Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Riverhead Books.
Jones, P. (2018). Contexts of co-creation: Designing with system stakeholders. In P. Jones & K. Kijima (Eds.), Systemic design: Theory, methods and practice (Translational systems sciences series, pp. 3–52). Tokyo: Springer.
Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Martin, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.
Kelley-Moore, J. A., Cagney, K. A., Skarupski, K. A., Everson-Rose, S. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2015). Do local social hierarchies matter for mental health? A study of neighbourhood social status and depressive symptoms in older adults. The Gerontological Society of America, 71(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv047
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. The Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107
Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8), 1965–1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022
Krugman, P. (1991). History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt. American Economic Review, 81(2), 80–83. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/2006830
Krell, D. F. (1993). In M. Heidegger, Basic writings: From Being and Time (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell, Ed. & Trans.) (Revised and expanded ed.). San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962).
Lally, S. (2014). The shape of energy. In C. Reed & N. M. Lister (Eds.), Projective ecologies (pp. 312–335). New York: Actar.
Lane, D., Pumain, D., & van der Leeuw, S. (2009). Introduction. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 1–7). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].
Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A. S., Norberg, J., de Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., et al. (2013). Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460
Lister, N. M. (2013). Insurgent ecologies: (Re)Claiming ground in landscape and urbanism. In M. Mostafavi & G. Doherty (Eds.), Ecological urbanism (pp. 536–547). Zürich, Switzerland: Lars Müller. (Original work published 2010).
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio, 36(8), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:CHANS]2.0.CO;2
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Loorbach, D., & Shiroyama, H. (2016). The challenge of sustainable urban development and transforming cities. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Governance of urban sustainability transitions: European and Asian experiences (pp. 3–12). Tokyo: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].
Lynes, J., & Wolfe, S. (2017). It’s time to rethink our messaging about environmental change. Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/itstime-to-rethink-our-messaging-about-environmental-change/article34914924/
Madlener, R., & Sunak, Y. (2011). Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management? Sustainable Cities Society, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006
Margolin, V. (2002). The politics of the artificial: Essays on design and design studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mascaro, J., Harris, J. A., Lach, L., Thompson, A., Perring, M. P., Richardson, D. M., et al. (2013). Origins of the novel ecosystems concept. In J. R. Hobbs, E. S. Higgs, & C. M. Hall (Eds.), Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order (pp. 45–57). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Maturana, H. (2016, September 13–15). Keynote presentation. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON: OCAD University.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Mau, B. (2010). Design and the welfare of all life. In L. Tilder & B. Blostein (Eds.), Design ecologies: Essays on the nature of design (pp. 10–25). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Mau, B., Leonard, J., & The Institute without Boundaries. (2004). Massive change. New York: Phaidon Press.
Mazria, E. (2003). It’s the architecture stupid! Buildings that welcome the flow. World and I, 18(1), 138. Retrieved from Academic OneFile https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA111579358&asid=6ba39ee70a65283da4d8ab5b86b5e145
McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., & Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003
McDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Güneralp, B. (2013). Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystems services. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 31–52). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
McDonough & Partners. (1992). The Hannover principles: Design for sustainability. Prepared for EXPO (p. 2000). Hannover, Germany: The World’s Fair.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2013). The upcycle: Beyond sustainability—Designing for abundance (1st ed.). New York: North Point Press.
McHarg, I. (1995). Design with nature. New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1969).
McNeill, J. R., & McNeill, W. H. (2003). The human web: A bird’s eye view of world history. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N. B., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience, 66(3), 198–212. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.
Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2005). Limits to growth: The 30 year update. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Mehaffy, M. W. (2007). On The Nature of Order: An interview with Christopher Alexander. Urban Design International, 12, 51–57. http://ejournals.ebsco.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/direct.asp?ArticleID=4797AB4B5AFF53E4DDE0
Mehaffy, M. W. (2008). Generative methods in urban design: A progress assessment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170801903678
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Midgley, G. (2003). Science as systemic intervention: Some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(2), 77–97. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/1094429x/v16i0002/77_sasisicftpos.xml
Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. Anchor Canada.
Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (2013). Ecological urbanism. In Zürich, Switzerland. Lars Müller: Publishers. (Original work published 2010).
Mui, C. (2016). Think big, start small, learn fast. Forbes Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2016/01/03/6-words/#569d08361a3b
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world—Foundations and fundamentals of design competence (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [E-book, ProQuest EBook Central].
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities: Responding to peak oil and climate change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Newman, P., Kosonen, L., & Kenworthy, J. (2016). Theory of urban fabrics: Planning the walking, transit/public transport and automobile/motor car cities for reduced car dependency. Theory of Urban Fabrics, 87(4), 429–458. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.28
Niemelä, J., Breuste, J. H., Elmqvist, T., Guntenspergen, G., James, P., & McIntyre, N. E. (Eds.). (2011). Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
Obrador-Pons, P. (2006). Dwelling: Home as refuge. In I. Douglas, R. Huggett, & C. Perkins (Eds.), Companion encyclopedia of geography: From local to global (pp. 957–968). London: Routledge.
Odum, H.T. (1988). Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 242(4882), 1132-1139. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/1702630
Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, power and society for the twenty-first century: The hierarchy of energy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Olsson, P., Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., & McCarthy, D. D. P. (2017). The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: A new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society 22(2), 31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09310-220231
Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon.
Perring, M. P., & Ellis, E. C. (2013). The extent of novel ecosystems: Long in time and broad in space. In J. R. Hobbs, E. S. Higgs, & C. M. Hall (Eds.), Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order (pp. 66–80). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pflieger, G., Pattaroni, L., Jemelin, C., & Kaufmann, V. (2008). The social fabric of the networked city. Abingdon, UK: EPFL Press.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Portugali, J. (2000). Self-organization and the city. New York: Springer.
Portugali, J. (2011). Complexity, cognition, and the city. New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Portugali, J. (2012a). Complexity theories of cities: Achievements, criticism and potentials. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 47–62). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Portugali, J. (2012b). Complexity theories of cities: Implications to urban planning. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 221–244). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Portugali, J. (2016). What makes cities complex? In J. Portugali & E. Stolk (Eds.), Complexity, cognition, urban planning and design: Post-proceedings of the 2nd delft international conference (pp. 3–19). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32653-5_1
Quilley, S. (2017). Navigating the Anthropocene: Environmental politics and complexity in an era of limits. In P. A. Victor & B. Dolter (Eds.), Handbook on growth and sustainability (pp. 439–470). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Quitzau, M.-B., Jensen, J. S., Elle, M., & Hoffman, B. (2013). Sustainable urban regime adjustments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.042
Ravetz, J. (2007). Post-normal science and the complexity -of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.001
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Redman, C. L. (2011). Social-ecological transformations in urban landscapes—A historical perspective. In J. Niemelä, J. H. Breuste, G. Guntenspergen, N. E. McIntyre, T. Elmqvist, & P. James (Eds.), Urban ecology: Patterns, processes, and applications (pp. 206–212). New York: Oxford University Press.
Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., del Ceno, J. S., & van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26S1, S7-S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541.
Rees, W. E. (2010). What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition and denial. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 6(2), 13-25. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/1430248098?accountid=14906
Rees, W. E. (2017). Going down? Human nature, growth and (un)sustainability. In P. A. Victor & B. Dolter (Eds.), Handbook on growth and sustainability (pp. 498–521). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Register, R. (2006). Ecocities: Rebuilding cities in balance with nature (Rev. ed.). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rockström, J., & Sukhdev, P. (2016). Keynote. EAT Forum. Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Andersen, Z. J., Braun-Fahrländer, C., Bruha, J., Bruhova-Foltynova, H., et al. (2016). Health impacts of active transportation in Europe. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149990
Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x
Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., & Vellinga, P. (2000). An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Review, 20(3), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/SO195-9255(00)00039-1
Ruttonsha, P. (2016a, September 13–15). Toward a (social) science of settlement, part I: Place-based ideologies [conference workshop]. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON: OCAD University.
Ruttonsha, P. (2016b, September 13–15). Toward a (social) science of settlement, part II: A dwelling perspective [conference workshop]. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON.
Ruttonsha, P. (2017). The many faces of design: From adaptive response to creative agency to emergent engagement. FormAkademisk, 10(1), 1-17, article 2. doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1458
van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (1996). Ecological design (10th anniversary ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sassen, S. (2009). Cities are at the center of our environmental future. Sapiens, 2(3), 1–8. Retrieved from http://sapiens.revues.org/948
Sassen, S. (2010). The city: Its return as a lens for social theory. City, Culture and Society, 1, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2010.04.003
Sassen, S. (2012). Cities in a world economy (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell with mind and matter & autobiographical sketches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1944).
Seto, K. C., Parnell, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2013). A global outlook on urbanization. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].
Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., et al. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. PNAS, 109(20), 7687–7692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117622109
Seto, K. C., Sánchez-Rodrígez, R., & Fragkias, J. (2010). The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125336
Sevaldson, B. (2016). A library of systemic relations. In P. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) 2016 Symposium. Toronto, Canada: Systemic Design Research Network. Retrieved from https://systemic-design.net/rsd-symposia/rsd5-2016/rsd5-theory-method/
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1969)
Smith, M. E. (2009). V. Gordon Childe and the urban revolution: A historical perspective on a revolution in urban studies. The Town Planning Review, 80(1), 3-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/27715085
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614–621. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/ stable/25547826
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Stott, R. (n.d.). The rise and “fall” of Architecture for Humanity. Metropolis. Retrieved from http://www.metropolismag.com/architecture/the-rise-and-fall-of-architecture-for-humanity/
Tainter, J. (2008). The collapse of complex societies, Edition 18. New York: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1988).
Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013
Thackara, J. (2015). How to thrive in the next economy: Designing tomorrow’s world today. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
Todd, J. (1985). An ecological economic order. Great Barrington, MA: E. F. Schumacher Society.
Tomalty, R. (2009a). Urban tipping point. Alternatives Journal, 35(5), 14–16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/218767068?accountid=14906
Tomalty, R. (2009b). The ecology of cities: Urban planners are starting to see cities as complex systems that ought to be conceptualized in a way that mimics natural processes. Alternatives Journal, 35(4), 18–21. Retrieved from http://go.galgroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA204075784&asid=c2f95c00547321110982cb9dd458ece4
Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Design for transitions—from and to what? Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686
Tzoulas, K., & Greening, K. (2011). Urban ecology and human health. In J. Niemelä, J. H. Breuste, T. Elmqvist, G. Guntenspergen, P. James, & N. E. McIntyre (Eds.), Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications (pp. 263–271). New York: Oxford University Press.
UN-Habitat. (2014). Urban equity in development – Cities for life, Concept paper. WuF7, Medellín. In Retrieved from. http://wuf7.unhabitat.org/wuf7theme
UN-Habitat. (n.d.). UN-Habitat for the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-for-the-sustainable-development-goals/
United Nations. (2015a). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html
United Nations. (2015b). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (General Assembly Resolution 70/1). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
United Nations. (2017). Progress towards the sustainable development goals (Report of the Secretary-General E/2017/66). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11
van der Leeuw, S. E., Lane, D., & Read, D. W. (2009). The long-term evolution of social organization. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 85–116). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2016). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Waldheim, C. (2006). The landscape urbanism reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J., & Lister, N. M. L. (2008). The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Wann, D. (1996). Deep design: Pathways to a livable future. Washington, DC: Island Press.
West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. New York: Penguin Press.
Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2, 2–19. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/sites/ca.waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilence/files/uploads/files/strategies_for_scaling_social_innovation.pdf
Westley, F., & McGowan, K. (2014). Design thinking, wicked problems, messy plans. In C. Reed & N. M. Lister (Eds.), Projective ecologies (pp. 290–311). New York: Actar.
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40(7), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9
Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2009). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, ON: Vintage Canada. (Original work published 2006).
Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., et al. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327
Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084550
Wilkinson, C. (2011). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues. Plan Theory, 11(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274
Wilson, E. O. (2002). The bottleneck. Scientific American, 286(2), 82–91. Retrieved from http://jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/26059564
Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2016). Governing transitions in cities: Fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, & J. Fujinon (Eds.), Governance of urban sustainability transitions (pp. 13–32). Tokyo: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].
Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopín, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., & van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004
Zamenopoulos, T., & Alexiou, K. (2012). A complexity theoretic view of cities as artefacts of design intentionality. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 327–346). New York: Springer [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for the support of the Waterloo Institute for Complexity and Innovation (WICI), to attend the 2016 Global Sustainability Summer School (GSSS) in Urban Sustainability at the Santa Fe Institute (SFI). She would also like to acknowledge the Institute without Boundaries (IwB), in Toronto, wherein much of this thinking originated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruttonsha, P. (2018). Towards a (Socio-ecological) Science of Settlement: Relational Dynamics as a Basis for Place. In: Jones, P., Kijima, K. (eds) Systemic Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55638-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55639-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)