Skip to main content

Towards a (Socio-ecological) Science of Settlement: Relational Dynamics as a Basis for Place

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Design

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 8))

Abstract

Cities are increasingly garnering attention on the global political stage, in light of the challenges and opportunities urbanization engenders for transition along sustainability and resilience pathways. Recently adopted as a target for change within sustainable development agendas, and recognized as central socioeconomic vehicles by which to mobilize related initiatives, the significance of urban systems to transition becomes most evident if we conceptualize them as being integrated within broader systems of settlements. Settlements are complex adaptive socio-ecological systems, which together as globalized networks embody the complete range of human-environment interactions and the complexity that has emerged along with these, over time. This framing is inspired by science of cities research and the dwelling perspective, both of which have elaborated on cities/settlements’ (1) coupled social-ecological-technological phenomena, (2) fundamental nature and function, (3) embodiment of scale-/network-based processes, and (4) emergent, multi-scale patterns of organization and impact. Ultimately, this could inform a relational approach to both sustainability and settlement planning, guided by analyses of these factors. It could also complement the burgeoning inclination in science and design disciplines to deconstruct the reflexive interactions that can occur between processes and forms, meaning and matter, people and places, the ephemeral and the concrete, the normative and the positive. By this means, we begin to invert our systemic design problem space, turning attention away from our constructed worlds, instead contemplating the ways of life they enable, in an integration between research and practice, observation and intervention, analyses and innovation, scholarship and poetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sustainability: This term was sanctified in the Brundtland Commission’s report, Our Common Future, wherein sustainable development has been defined as that which “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland, <CitationRef CitationID="CR34" >1987</Citation Ref>). Or as Gibson (<CitationRef CitationID="CR79" >2016</Citation Ref>) has summarized, more recently, “We can begin by treating sustainability as current language for lasting wellbeing and exploring what pursuing lasting wellbeing entails” (p. 3).

  2. 2.

    Resilience: “The capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change so as to still retain essentially the same function, structure and feedbacks, and therefore identity…” (Folke et al., <CitationRef CitationID="CR74" >2010</Citation Ref>, p. 20).

  3. 3.

    Transition: “A transition is a radical, structural change of a societal (sub)system that is the result of a coevolution of economic, cultural, technological, ecological, and institutional developments at different scale levels” (Rotmans & Loorbach, <CitationRef CitationID="CR174" >2009</Citation Ref>, p. 185).

  4. 4.

    Socio-ecological Systems: “The evolving world system can be considered a socio-ecological system, comprised of environmental and human subsystems and their interactions. The environmental subsystem, in turn, is composed of ecosystems, biophysical processes and other aspects of the natural world. The economic system includes capital, labor, other inputs, and the production processes in which they are used. The social subsystem includes consumption patterns, demographics, and culture” (Gallopín & Raskin, <CitationRef CitationID="CR76" >2002</Citation Ref>, p. 5–6).

  5. 5.

    Adjacent Possible: “The adjacent possible is a kind of shadow future, hovering on the edges of the present state of things, a map of all the ways in which the present can reinvent itself” (Johnson, <CitationRef CitationID="CR231" >2010</Citation Ref>, p. 31).

  6. 6.

    The first saw the rise of ancient civilizations around 10,000 B.C.; the second began around 1800 A.D., coinciding with the industrial revolution; and the third began in 2010, at which point 50% of global populations were living in urban regions (Angel, <CitationRef CitationID="CR5" >2012</Citation Ref>).

  7. 7.

    Goal 11, Sustainable Cities and Communities: “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” (United Nations, <CitationRef CitationID="CR205" >2015b</Citation Ref>, p. 14).

  8. 8.

    Extended Peer Communities “[consist] not merely of persons with some form or other of institutional accreditation [such as scientists, industry or government], but rather of all those with a desire to participate in the resolution of the issue” (Funtowicz & Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR228" >2003</Citation Ref>, p. 7).

  9. 9.

    Post-Normal Science decision-making conditions combine high uncertainty with high stakes, sit at the intersection of policy and science, require evaluation of both fact and value statements, and are often embedded within complex scenarios (Funtowicz & Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR228" >2003</Citation Ref>; Ravetz, <CitationRef CitationID="CR164" >2007</Citation Ref>).

  10. 10.

    Critical Transitions occur when a system shifts from one state (i.e. basin of attraction) to another (also referred to as crossing a threshold) and without prospect of returning easily to its previous state (Scheffer, <CitationRef CitationID="CR183" >2009</Citation Ref>; Walker & Salt, <CitationRef CitationID="CR210" >2006</Citation Ref>).

  11. 11.

    In urbanized, globalized contexts, we have even redefined the meaning of a nomadic lifestyle. Today, we can live a life on the road, supported by transnational banking, international transit, digital communication, and otherwise.

  12. 12.

    Ekistics denotes both a specific settlement orientation and at the same time a wide field of interest, encompassing all those processes which have served to form settlements throughout history” (Bell & Tyrwhitt, <CitationRef CitationID="CR19" >1972</Citation Ref>, p. 28).

  13. 13.

    Five Principles of Settlement: (1) maximization of man’s potential contacts with the elements of nature, with people, and with the works of man; (2) minimization of the effort required for the achievement of man’s actual and potential contacts; (3) optimization of man’s protective space, which means the selection of such a distance from other persons, animals, or objects that he can keep his contacts with them without any kind of sensory or psychological discomfort; (4) optimization of the quality of man’s relationship with his environment, which consists of nature, society, shells, and networks; and (5) optimization of the four other principles, dependent on time and space, actual conditions, and man’s ability to create a synthesis (Doxiadis, <CitationRef CitationID="CR61" >1970</Citation Ref>, pp. 2–3).

  14. 14.

    Systems of Cities: “What we call systems of cities are evolutionary objects that may include subsets of cities connected by long-distance networks or cities belonging to unified political territories…The precise identification of systems of cities is very difficult, due to the changing nature of the interactions that need to be considered, and the fluctuations in their spatial extension” (Bretagnolle et al., <CitationRef CitationID="CR30" >2009</Citation Ref>, p. 200).

  15. 15.

    Global Cities: This concept refers to a type of function, situated within complex cities, involving the production of advanced intermediary services (i.e. finance, legal, trade, etc.), that facilitate cross-border exchanges and globalized activities (Sassen, 2012).

  16. 16.

    Design Space: The total set of prospective designs that could be rendered (Beinhocker, <CitationRef CitationID="CR002" >2011</Citation Ref>).

  17. 17.

    Ideal Type: In this method of analysis, a model exemplar of a given social or cultural phenomenon is identified, against which other instances can be compared and connected. Sociologist and political economist Max Weber analysed cities in this way, wherein he illustrated how those arising within very different times and places could be related through their shared characteristics, as opposed to generalized laws (Portugali, <CitationRef CitationID="CR156" >2000</Citation Ref>).

  18. 18.

    Form is the physical embodiment of a system’s pattern of organization; matter is the material structure of a system; the process of life is the activity involved in the continual embodiment of the system’s pattern of organization; meaning is the inner world of reflective consciousness (derived from Capra & Luisi, <CitationRef CitationID="CR39" >2014</Citation Ref>, pp. 303–304).

  19. 19.

    Emergy “...is the available energy of one kind previously used up directly and indirectly to make a product or service” (Odum, <CitationRef CitationID="CR149" >2007</Citation Ref>, p. 89).

  20. 20.

    Third Industrial Revolution: This current regime shift represents the implications of information technology on production, operational management, and distribution (Rifkin, <CitationRef CitationID="CR170" >2011</Citation Ref>).

  21. 21.

    Personal communication with William Rees, Canadian Society for Ecological Economics Conference, October 4, 2015, Vancouver.

References

  • Abdel-Rahman, H. M., & Anas, A. (2003). Theories of systems of cities. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics (Vol. 4, 1st ed., pp. 2293–2339). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2002–2005). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe (Books 1–4). Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. (2012). Cities: The visible expression of co-evolving complexity. In J. Portugali (Ed.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 67–89). New York: Springer. [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. (Ed.). (2006). The Penguin complete English dictionary. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel, S. (2012). Planet of cities. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Architecture for Humanity. (2012). Design like you give a damn [2]: Building change from the ground up. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairoch, P. (1988). Cities and economic development: From the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam, Y. (1992). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013a). The new science of cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013b). A theory of city size. Science, 340(6139), 1418–1419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013c). Big data, smart cities, and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2014). Great planning disasters. In M. Tewdwr-Jones, N. A. Phelps, & R. Freestone (Eds.), The planning imagination: Peter hall and the study of urban and regional planning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Marshall, S. (2012). The origins of complexity theory in cities and planning. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 21–45). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of biophilic city planning and design. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Garza, E., Kent, J., Kubiszewski, I. et al. (2009). Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(8), 2483–2489. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org_cgi_doi_10.1073_pnas.0812570106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, P. (2017, May 16–17). New sentient architecture. Living on the precipice: Interdisciplinary conference on resilience in complex natural and human systems, Waterloo, ON, The University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E. D. (2011). Evolution as computation: Integrating self-organization with generalized Darwinism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 393–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137411000257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G., & Tyrwhitt, J. (1972). Human identity in the urban environment. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature (1st ed.). New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, W. (2009). Glimmer: How design can transform your world. Toronto, ON: Random House Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Link].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. (2013a). The origins of scaling in cities. Science, 340(6139), 1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. (2013b). The kind of problem a city is. SFI Working Paper #2013-03-008

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. (2014). The uses of big data in cities. Big Data, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467(7318), 912–913. https://doi.org/10.1038/467912a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biron, C. L. (2016). The worldwide effort to shape sustainable urban development. City Lab. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/environment/2016/07/cities-turn-to-implementing-the-sustainable-development-goals/490490/

  • Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2008). Urbanization and the wealth of nations. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 319(5864), 772–775. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/20053315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsman, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption (1st ed.). New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle, A., Pumain, D., & Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C. (2009). The organization of urban systems. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 197–220). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromell, L., & Cagney, K. A. (2015). Companionship in the neighborhood context: Older adults’ living arrangements and perceptions of social cohesion. Res Aging, 36(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027512475096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. G., & Garver, G. (2009). Right relationship: Building a whole earth economy. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation (1st ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future (The Brundtland Report). Medicine, Conflict and Survival (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections: Integrating the biological, cognitive, and social dimensions of life into a science of sustainability. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2006). Cities, the informational society and the global economy. In N. Brenner & R. Keil (Eds.), The global cities reader (pp. 135–136). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2008). The networked city. In G. Pflieger, L. Pattaroni, C. Jemelin, & V. Kaufmann (Eds.), The social fabric of the networked city (pp. v–xiii). Abingdon, UK: EPFL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010a). Globalisation, networking, urbanisation: Reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2737–2745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010b). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. Town Planning Review, 21(1), 3-17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/40102108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, F., Jarzombek, M., & Vikramaditya, P. (2011). A global history of architecture (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D. (2004). Maps of time: An introduction to big history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (2007). Making sense of a complex world. In M. Aaltonen (Ed.), The third lens: Multi-ontology sensemaking and strategic decision making (pp. 99–110). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, P. (2010). Seven rules for sustainable communities: Design strategies for a post-carbon world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., West, S., & Boonstra, W. J. (2016). Dwelling in the biosphere: Exploring an embodied human-environment connection in resilience thinking. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0367-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer. [E-book, Springer Link].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. S., & Norberg, J. (2008). Scale and complex systems. In J. Norberg & G. S. Cumming (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 246–276). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, D. (2009). Wicked. Alternatives Journal, 35(5), 8–11. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/21222889?accountid=14906

  • Curran, D., & Tomalty, R. (2003). Living it up: The wide range of support for smart growth in Canada promises more livable towns and cities. Alternatives Journal, 29(3), 10+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA108007273&asid=4683cdec6b7f1f22b5ac1152bec27f04

  • Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Nature and society through the lens of resilience: Toward a human-in-ecosystem perspective. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 53–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Link].

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological complexity, 3(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roo, G., & Rauws, W. S. (2012). Positioning planning in the world of order, chaos and complexity: On perspectives, behavior and interventions in a non-linear environment. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 6207–6220). New York: Springer [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism succeeds in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B., & Goudsblom, J. (Eds.). (2002). Mappae mundi: Humans and their habitats in a long-term ecological perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2005a). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2005b). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1969). The city (II): Ecumenopolis, world-city of tomorrow. Impact of Science on Society, 19(2), 179-193. Retrieved from http://www.doxiadis.org/Downloads/the_city_ecumenopolis.pdf

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1970). Ekistics, the science of human settlements. Science, 170(3956), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3956.393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1974). Anthropolis: City for human development. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhl, L. (1996). An ecohistory of health: The role of ‘healthy cities’. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 258–261. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhl, L. (2005). Healthy cities and the built environment. Built Environment, 31(4), 356–361. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/10.2148/benv.2005.31.4.356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusch, B., Crilly, N., & Moultrie, J. (2010). Developing a framework for mapping sustainable design activities. Design Research Society Conference. Retrieved from http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/033.pdf

  • Edmonson, A. (2007). A Fuller explanation: The synergetic geometry of R.  Buckminster Fuller. (Back-in-action edition). Pueblo, CO: Emergent World Press. Retrieved from https://buckyworld.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/afullerexplanation-by-amy-edmondson.pdf (Original work published 1987).

  • Ellard, C. (2015). Places of the heart: The psychogeography of everyday life. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (Eds.). (2013a). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (2013b). Stewardship of the biosphere in the urban era. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 719–746). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Redman, C. L., Barthel, S., & Costanza, R. (2013). History of urbanization and the missing ecology. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 13–30). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ernston, H., van der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., et al. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio, 39(8), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, E. (2002). The influence of de Soto’s ‘The Mystery of Capital’. Land Lines, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/lla020103.pdf

  • Florida, R. L. (2008). Who’s your city: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2014, April 17). 11 reasons the UN should make cities the focus of its forthcoming sustainable development goals. The Atlantic City Lab. Retrieved from http://www.citylab.com/work/2014/04/11-reasons-un-should-make-cities-focus-its-new-sustainable-development-goals/8896/

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/

  • Fragkias, M., Guneralp, B., Seto, K.C., & Goodness, J. (2013). A synthesis of global urbanization projections. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, … & C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 409–435) [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books]. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (1971). Nine chains to the moon. New York: Doubleday. (Original published 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (1981). Critical path (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, K. (1983). Toward a critical regionalism: Six points for an architecture of resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 16–30). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2003). Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, 1–10. Retrieved from http://isecoeco.org/pstnormsc.pdf

  • Gallopín, G. C., & Raskin, P. D. (2002). Global sustainability: Bending the curve. New York: Routledge/SEI Global Environment and Development Series. [E-Book, Taylor and Francis Group Link].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. B. (2016). Sustainability assessment applications and opportunities. New York: Routledge. [E-Book, ProQuest Link].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., et al. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. New Series, 319(5864), 756-760. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/20053310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Tharakan, P., Cleveland, J., Hallock, C., & Jefferson, M. (2003). Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature, 426(6964), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (2004a). Forward. In K. Ausubel & J. P. Harpignies (Eds.), Nature’s operating instructions: The true biotechnologies (pp. vii–vix). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (2004b). Brother, can you spare a paradigm? In K. Ausubel & J. P. Harpignies (Eds.), Nature’s operating instructions: The true biotechnologies (pp. 147–160). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993). Building, dwelling, thinking. In M. Heidegger, Basic writings: From Being and Time (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell Ed. & Trans.) (Revised and expanded ed.) (pp. 343–363). San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco (Original work published 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. (Original work published 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. (2013). Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 497(7447), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. (1995). Paradigms in progress: Life beyond economics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. R., Higgs, E. S., & Hall, C. M. (Eds.). (2013). Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, A. (2001). Introduction. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.) (pp. ix–xxii). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics (Original work published 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405. Retrieved from http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/resolve/14329840/v04i0005/0390_utcoeeass.xml

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. (2006). The upside of down: Catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Toronto, ON: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T., Walker, B., Biggs, R., Crépin, A. S., Folke, C., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2015). Synchronous failure: The emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07681-200306

  • Honoré, C. (2004). In praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed. Toronto, ON: Vintage Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, R. (2011). The transition companion: Making your community more resilient in uncertain times. Cambridge, UK: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hysler-Rubin, N. (2011). Patrick Geddes and town planning: A critical view. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEO. (2015). The field guide to human-centred design. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org/resources/1

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2005). Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation Society, 3(2), 501–508. Retrieved from http://www.conservationandsociety.org/text.asp?2005/3/2/501/49324

  • Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S., & Lahti, T. (2004). The natural step for communities: How cities and towns can change to sustainable practices. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1997). Complex systems: The role of interactions. In D. S. Alberts & T. J. Czerwinski (Eds.), Complexity, global politics, and national security (pp. 20–31). Washington, DC: National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2018). Contexts of co-creation: Designing with system stakeholders. In P. Jones & K. Kijima (Eds.), Systemic design: Theory, methods and practice (Translational systems sciences series, pp. 3–52). Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Martin, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley-Moore, J. A., Cagney, K. A., Skarupski, K. A., Everson-Rose, S. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2015). Do local social hierarchies matter for mental health? A study of neighbourhood social status and depressive symptoms in older adults. The Gerontological Society of America, 71(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. The Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8), 1965–1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt. American Economic Review, 81(2), 80–83. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/2006830

  • Krell, D. F. (1993). In M. Heidegger, Basic writings: From Being and Time (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell, Ed. & Trans.) (Revised and expanded ed.). San Francisco, CA: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lally, S. (2014). The shape of energy. In C. Reed & N. M. Lister (Eds.), Projective ecologies (pp. 312–335). New York: Actar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D., Pumain, D., & van der Leeuw, S. (2009). Introduction. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 1–7). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A. S., Norberg, J., de Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., et al. (2013). Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, N. M. (2013). Insurgent ecologies: (Re)Claiming ground in landscape and urbanism. In M. Mostafavi & G. Doherty (Eds.), Ecological urbanism (pp. 536–547). Zürich, Switzerland: Lars Müller. (Original work published 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio, 36(8), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:CHANS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D., & Shiroyama, H. (2016). The challenge of sustainable urban development and transforming cities. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Governance of urban sustainability transitions: European and Asian experiences (pp. 3–12). Tokyo: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynes, J., & Wolfe, S. (2017). It’s time to rethink our messaging about environmental change. Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/itstime-to-rethink-our-messaging-about-environmental-change/article34914924/

  • Madlener, R., & Sunak, Y. (2011). Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management? Sustainable Cities Society, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, V. (2002). The politics of the artificial: Essays on design and design studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro, J., Harris, J. A., Lach, L., Thompson, A., Perring, M. P., Richardson, D. M., et al. (2013). Origins of the novel ecosystems concept. In J. R. Hobbs, E. S. Higgs, & C. M. Hall (Eds.), Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order (pp. 45–57). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (2016, September 13–15). Keynote presentation. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON: OCAD University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mau, B. (2010). Design and the welfare of all life. In L. Tilder & B. Blostein (Eds.), Design ecologies: Essays on the nature of design (pp. 10–25). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, B., Leonard, J., & The Institute without Boundaries. (2004). Massive change. New York: Phaidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazria, E. (2003). It’s the architecture stupid! Buildings that welcome the flow. World and I, 18(1), 138. Retrieved from Academic OneFile https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA111579358&asid=6ba39ee70a65283da4d8ab5b86b5e145

  • McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., & Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Güneralp, B. (2013). Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystems services. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 31–52). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough & Partners. (1992). The Hannover principles: Design for sustainability. Prepared for EXPO (p. 2000). Hannover, Germany: The World’s Fair.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2013). The upcycle: Beyond sustainability—Designing for abundance (1st ed.). New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. (1995). Design with nature. New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J. R., & McNeill, W. H. (2003). The human web: A bird’s eye view of world history. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N. B., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience, 66(3), 198–212. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2005). Limits to growth: The 30 year update. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehaffy, M. W. (2007). On The Nature of Order: An interview with Christopher Alexander. Urban Design International, 12, 51–57. http://ejournals.ebsco.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/direct.asp?ArticleID=4797AB4B5AFF53E4DDE0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehaffy, M. W. (2008). Generative methods in urban design: A progress assessment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170801903678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2003). Science as systemic intervention: Some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(2), 77–97. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/1094429x/v16i0002/77_sasisicftpos.xml

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. Anchor Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (2013). Ecological urbanism. In Zürich, Switzerland. Lars Müller: Publishers. (Original work published 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mui, C. (2016). Think big, start small, learn fast. Forbes Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2016/01/03/6-words/#569d08361a3b

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world—Foundations and fundamentals of design competence (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [E-book, ProQuest EBook Central].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities: Responding to peak oil and climate change. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Kosonen, L., & Kenworthy, J. (2016). Theory of urban fabrics: Planning the walking, transit/public transport and automobile/motor car cities for reduced car dependency. Theory of Urban Fabrics, 87(4), 429–458. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.28

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, J., Breuste, J. H., Elmqvist, T., Guntenspergen, G., James, P., & McIntyre, N. E. (Eds.). (2011). Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrador-Pons, P. (2006). Dwelling: Home as refuge. In I. Douglas, R. Huggett, & C. Perkins (Eds.), Companion encyclopedia of geography: From local to global (pp. 957–968). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H.T. (1988). Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 242(4882), 1132-1139. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/1702630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, power and society for the twenty-first century: The hierarchy of energy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., & McCarthy, D. D. P. (2017). The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: A new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society 22(2), 31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09310-220231

  • Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perring, M. P., & Ellis, E. C. (2013). The extent of novel ecosystems: Long in time and broad in space. In J. R. Hobbs, E. S. Higgs, & C. M. Hall (Eds.), Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order (pp. 66–80). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, G., Pattaroni, L., Jemelin, C., & Kaufmann, V. (2008). The social fabric of the networked city. Abingdon, UK: EPFL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2000). Self-organization and the city. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2011). Complexity, cognition, and the city. New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2012a). Complexity theories of cities: Achievements, criticism and potentials. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 47–62). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2012b). Complexity theories of cities: Implications to urban planning. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 221–244). New York: Springer [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2016). What makes cities complex? In J. Portugali & E. Stolk (Eds.), Complexity, cognition, urban planning and design: Post-proceedings of the 2nd delft international conference (pp. 3–19). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32653-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quilley, S. (2017). Navigating the Anthropocene: Environmental politics and complexity in an era of limits. In P. A. Victor & B. Dolter (Eds.), Handbook on growth and sustainability (pp. 439–470). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quitzau, M.-B., Jensen, J. S., Elle, M., & Hoffman, B. (2013). Sustainable urban regime adjustments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. (2007). Post-normal science and the complexity -of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. L. (2011). Social-ecological transformations in urban landscapes—A historical perspective. In J. Niemelä, J. H. Breuste, G. Guntenspergen, N. E. McIntyre, T. Elmqvist, & P. James (Eds.), Urban ecology: Patterns, processes, and applications (pp. 206–212). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., del Ceno, J. S., & van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26S1, S7-S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (2010). What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition and denial. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 6(2), 13-25. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/1430248098?accountid=14906

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (2017). Going down? Human nature, growth and (un)sustainability. In P. A. Victor & B. Dolter (Eds.), Handbook on growth and sustainability (pp. 498–521). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Register, R. (2006). Ecocities: Rebuilding cities in balance with nature (Rev. ed.). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., & Sukhdev, P. (2016). Keynote. EAT Forum. Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html

  • Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Andersen, Z. J., Braun-Fahrländer, C., Bruha, J., Bruhova-Foltynova, H., et al. (2016). Health impacts of active transportation in Europe. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., & Vellinga, P. (2000). An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Review, 20(3), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/SO195-9255(00)00039-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttonsha, P. (2016a, September 13–15). Toward a (social) science of settlement, part I: Place-based ideologies [conference workshop]. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON: OCAD University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttonsha, P. (2016b, September 13–15). Toward a (social) science of settlement, part II: A dwelling perspective [conference workshop]. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) Symposium: Systemic Design for Social Complexity. Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttonsha, P. (2017). The many faces of design: From adaptive response to creative agency to emergent engagement. FormAkademisk, 10(1), 1-17, article 2. doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1458

  • van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (1996). Ecological design (10th anniversary ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2009). Cities are at the center of our environmental future. Sapiens, 2(3), 1–8. Retrieved from http://sapiens.revues.org/948

  • Sassen, S. (2010). The city: Its return as a lens for social theory. City, Culture and Society, 1, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2010.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2012). Cities in a world economy (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell with mind and matter & autobiographical sketches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Parnell, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2013). A global outlook on urbanization. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer. [E-Book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., et al. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. PNAS, 109(20), 7687–7692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117622109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Sánchez-Rodrígez, R., & Fragkias, J. (2010). The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevaldson, B. (2016). A library of systemic relations. In P. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD5) 2016 Symposium. Toronto, Canada: Systemic Design Research Network. Retrieved from https://systemic-design.net/rsd-symposia/rsd5-2016/rsd5-theory-method/

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E. (2009). V. Gordon Childe and the urban revolution: A historical perspective on a revolution in urban studies. The Town Planning Review, 80(1), 3-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/27715085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614–621. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/ stable/25547826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, R. (n.d.). The rise and “fall” of Architecture for Humanity. Metropolis. Retrieved from http://www.metropolismag.com/architecture/the-rise-and-fall-of-architecture-for-humanity/

  • Tainter, J. (2008). The collapse of complex societies, Edition 18. New York: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2015). How to thrive in the next economy: Designing tomorrow’s world today. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. (1985). An ecological economic order. Great Barrington, MA: E. F. Schumacher Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomalty, R. (2009a). Urban tipping point. Alternatives Journal, 35(5), 14–16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/docview/218767068?accountid=14906

  • Tomalty, R. (2009b). The ecology of cities: Urban planners are starting to see cities as complex systems that ought to be conceptualized in a way that mimics natural processes. Alternatives Journal, 35(4), 18–21. Retrieved from http://go.galgroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=uniwater&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA204075784&asid=c2f95c00547321110982cb9dd458ece4

  • Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Design for transitions—from and to what? Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas, K., & Greening, K. (2011). Urban ecology and human health. In J. Niemelä, J. H. Breuste, T. Elmqvist, G. Guntenspergen, P. James, & N. E. McIntyre (Eds.), Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications (pp. 263–271). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2014). Urban equity in development – Cities for life, Concept paper. WuF7, Medellín. In Retrieved from. http://wuf7.unhabitat.org/wuf7theme

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (n.d.). UN-Habitat for the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-for-the-sustainable-development-goals/

  • United Nations. (2015a). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html

  • United Nations. (2015b). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (General Assembly Resolution 70/1). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

  • United Nations. (2017). Progress towards the sustainable development goals (Report of the Secretary-General E/2017/66). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11

  • van der Leeuw, S. E., Lane, D., & Read, D. W. (2009). The long-term evolution of social organization. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. E. van der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, methods series 7 (pp. 85–116). Berlin, Germany: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2016). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldheim, C. (2006). The landscape urbanism reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J., & Lister, N. M. L. (2008). The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann, D. (1996). Deep design: Pathways to a livable future. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2, 2–19. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/sites/ca.waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilence/files/uploads/files/strategies_for_scaling_social_innovation.pdf

  • Westley, F., & McGowan, K. (2014). Design thinking, wicked problems, messy plans. In C. Reed & N. M. Lister (Eds.), Projective ecologies (pp. 290–311). New York: Actar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40(7), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2009). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, ON: Vintage Canada. (Original work published 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., et al. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (2011). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues. Plan Theory, 11(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2002). The bottleneck. Scientific American, 286(2), 8291. Retrieved from http://jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwaterloo.ca/stable/26059564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2016). Governing transitions in cities: Fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, & J. Fujinon (Eds.), Governance of urban sustainability transitions (pp. 13–32). Tokyo: Springer. [E-Book, Springer Link].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopín, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., & van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamenopoulos, T., & Alexiou, K. (2012). A complexity theoretic view of cities as artefacts of design intentionality. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age: An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 327–346). New York: Springer [E-book, Scholars Portal Books].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the support of the Waterloo Institute for Complexity and Innovation (WICI), to attend the 2016 Global Sustainability Summer School (GSSS) in Urban Sustainability at the Santa Fe Institute (SFI). She would also like to acknowledge the Institute without Boundaries (IwB), in Toronto, wherein much of this thinking originated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perin Ruttonsha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruttonsha, P. (2018). Towards a (Socio-ecological) Science of Settlement: Relational Dynamics as a Basis for Place. In: Jones, P., Kijima, K. (eds) Systemic Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics