Abstract
The chapter presents a facet of the hidden histories of systems design. It focuses on the German development, especially the trajectories that emerged from the Heidelberg-based Studiengruppe für Systemforschung (SfS) (1958–1975). The group gathered a number of important systems researchers and contributed, at least indirectly, to the development of the author’s theoretical and methodological position. System concepts are examined from a design perspective and the crucial notion of the “inquiring system” is elaborated, the latter providing the basis for dealing with the mix of facts and values inherent in design research. This sets the stage for methodological developments, especially the generic APS model of design and research processes: Analysis – Projection – Synthesis (Jonas W. Viable structures and generative tools – an approach towards ‘designing designing. In: Proceedings of EAD conference, Stockholm, April, 1997a; Jonas W. N-th order design? Systemic concepts for research in advanced methodology. Submitted to Design Issues special issue on design research (unpublished), 1997b) and its practical implementation. Three authors will be presented in some more detail. Their approaches complement each other and provide a flexible model and toolbox for systemic design processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, E. (2006). The epistemology of democracy. Episteme, 3(1–2), 8–22.
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Archer, B. (1981). A view of the nature of design research. In R. Jacques & J. Powell (Eds.), Design:Science:Method. Guildford, UK: Westbury House.
Baecker, D. (2000). Wie steht es mit dem Willen Allahs? Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 21(1), 145–176.
Brinckmann, A. (2006). Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung in den 60er Jahren. Die Studiengruppe für Systemforschung 1958 bis 1975. Berlin: edition sigma
Brown, V. A. (2010). Collective inquiry and its wicked problems. In V. A Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination (pp. 61–83). London: Earthscan.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Buchanan, R. (2001) Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4, Autumn), 3–23.
Chow, R., Grand, S., & Jonas, W. (2013) Alternative design doctorates as drivers for new forms of research. Or: Knowing and not-knowing in design. In A.-Chr. Engels-Schwarzpaul, M. A. Peters (Eds.), Of other thoughts: Non-traditional ways to the doctorate (pp. 183–202). Rotterdam, the Netherlands/Boston/Taipei, Taiwan: Sense Publishers.
Christakis, A. N. (1996). A people science: The CogniScope ™ systems approach. SYSTEMS (official journal of the Polish Systems Society), 1(1).
Churchman, C. W. (1968). Challenge to reason. New York: McGraw Hill.
Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books.
Cooper, R., & Press, M. (1995). The design agenda. A guide to successful design management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Courtney, J. F., Chae, B., & Hall, D. (2000). Developing inquiring organizations. Knowledge and Innovation, 1(1), 132–145.
De Zeeuw, G. (1996) Three phases of science: A methodological exploration. Working paper No. 7 of the Centre for Systems and Information Sciences, University of Humberside, 1996, ISBN 1 86050 025 0.
De Zeeuw, G. (2010). Research to support social interventions. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 4–24.
Der Spiegel. (1970). System Orakel. Der Spiegel, No. 44/1970, 41–42.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Findeli, A. (2010). Searching for design research questions. In R. Chow, W. Jonas, & G. Joost (Eds.), Questions, hypotheses & conjectures, discussions on projects by early stage and senior design researchers (pp. 286–303). iUniverse.
Fallman, D. (2008). The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4–18.
Gausemeier, J., Fink, A., & Schlake, O. (1996). Szenario-Management: Planen und Führen mit Szenarien. München, Germany/Wien, Austria: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2010). The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 93–101). New York: Routledge.
Gerhold, L., et al. (Eds.). (2015). Standards und Gütekriterien der Zukunftsforschung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
Glanville, R. (1997). A ship without a Rudder. In R. Glanville & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Problems of excavating cybernetics and systems. Southsea, UK: BKS+.
Glanville, R. (1980). Why design research. In R. Jacques & J. Powell (Eds.), Design:Science:Method (p. 93). Guildford, UK: Westbury House.
Inayatullah, S. (1998). Causal layered analysis: Poststructuralism as method. Futures, 30(8), 815–829.
Jonas, W. (1994). Design – System – Theorie. Essen, Germany: Verlag die Blaue Eule.
Jonas, W. (1997a). Viable structures and generative tools – An approach towards ‘designing designing. In Proceedings of EAD Conference, Stockholm, April 1997.
Jonas, W. (1997b). N-th order design? Systemic concepts for research in advanced methodology. Submitted to Design Issues special issue on design research (unpublished).
Jonas, W. (2007). Research through DESIGN through research: A cybernetic model of designing design foundations. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1362–1380. Special Issue on Cybernetics and Design.
Jonas, W. (2014). Research for uncertainty. Überlegungen zur Forschung durch Design. In M. Buchert (Ed.), Reflexives Entwerfen. Berlin, Germany: jovis Verlag.
Jonas, W., Zerwas, S., & von Anshelm, K. (Eds.). (2015). Transformation design. Perspectives on a new design attitude. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Jones, J. C. (1970). Design methods: Seeds of human futures. New York/Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, J. C. (1999). The internet and everyone. London: Ellipsis.
Jones, P. (2014). Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In G. Metcalf (Ed.), Social systems and design (pp. 91–128). Tokyo: Springer.
Joost, G., Bredies, K., Christensen, M., Conradi, F., Unteidig, A., & Board of International Research in Design (Eds.). (2016). Design as research: Positions, arguments, perspectives. Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., & Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: The importance of everyday life and lifestyles as a leverage point for sustainability transitions. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/15403946/Transition_Design_The_Importance_of_Everyday_Life_and_Lifestyles_as_a_Leverage_Point_for_Sustainability_Transitions
Krauch, H. (1972). Computer-Demokratie. Hilft uns die Technik entscheiden? München, Germany: Goldmann.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL/London/New York: Taylor & Francis.
Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
Latour, B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280(5361), 208–209.
Latour, B. (2003). Assembly or assemblage? Politics and polytechnics. Lecture presented at Politecnico di Milano, 17 November 2003. Retrieved 10 April, 2015, from http://www.fondazionebassetti.org/06/argomenti/2004_01.htm#000203
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1996). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lykins, C. (2009). Social science and the moral life. In Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy Annual Conference, March 2009. Retrieved from http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/mleldrid/SAAP/TAMU/P39G.htm
Malik Management Zentrum St. Gallen. (n.d.) Sensitivity Model Prof. Vester®. The computerized system tools for a new management of complex problems.
Maser, S. (1972). Einige Bemerkungen zum Problem einer Theorie des Designs. Braunschweig, Germany: Selbstverlag.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflection. New York/London: The Apex Press.
Meadows, D. H. (2008) Thinking in systems – A primer. London: Earthscan.
Michl, J. (2002). On seeing design as redesign. Retrieved from http://janmichl.com/eng.redesign.html.
Mielke, J., Vermaßen, H., Ellenbeck, S., Milan, B. F., & Jaeger, C. (2016). Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science—A critical view. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 71–81.
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Nicolescu, B. (2008). Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice. New York: Hampton Press.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Nowotny, H. (2006, May). The potential of transdisciplinarity. Interdisciplines. Retrieved from http://www.helga-nowotny.eu/downloads/helga_nowotny_b59.pdf
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Pourdehnad, J., Wexler, E. R., & Wilson, D. (2011). Integrating systems thinking and design thinking. Systems Thinker, 22(9), 2–7.
Riedl, R. (2000). Strukturen der Komplexität. Eine Morphologie des Erkennens und Erklärens. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1972). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Working Paper No. 194, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.
Schneidewind, U., & Singer-Brodowski, M. (2014). Transformative Wissenschaft: Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts- und Hochschulsystem. Weimar b Marburg: Metropolis.
Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. Planning for the future in an uncertain world. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Seefried, E. (2015). Zukünfte. Aufstieg und Krise der Zukunftsforschung 1945–1980. Berlin, Germany/Boston: De Gruyter.
Sen, A. (2008). Social choice. In The new palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Simon, K.-H. (2011) Systemforschung—Politikberatung: Beiträge von und im Umfeld von Helmut Krauch und der Studiengruppe Systemforschung. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1969, 1981, 1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.
Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ulrich, W. (1979). Zur Metaphysik der Planung. Eine Debatte zwischen Herbert A. Simon und C. West Churchman. Die Unternehmung, 33(3), 201–211.
Ulrich, W. (1994) Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design? In Interfaces 24, no. 4, pp. 26–37. Rev. version, 20 March 2009. In: A tribute to C.W. Churchman. Retrieved from http://wulrich.com/downloads.html
Van Patter, G. K., & Jones, P. (2013). Understanding design 1,2,3,4: The rise of visual sensemaking. In T. Poldma (Ed.), Meanings of designed spaces (pp. 331–342). New York: Fairchild Books.
Vester, F. (1972). Design für eine Umwelt des Überlebens. Umweltgestaltung im Systemzusammenhang – eine Herausforderung an das Design der Welt von morgen. In: form 60 Zeitschrift für Gestaltung IV 1972.
Vester, F. (1988). Leitmotiv vernetztes Denken. Für einen besseren Umgang mit der Welt. München, Germany: Wilhelm Heyne Verlag.
Vester, F. (1990). Ausfahrt Zukunft. Strategien für den Verkehr von morgen. Eine Systemuntersuchung. Wilhelm Heyne Verlag: München, Germany.
Vester, F. (1997). The art of interconnected thinking: Tools and concepts for a new approach to tackling complexity. München, Germany: MCB Publishing House.
WBGU. (2011). Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Berlin: WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen).
Weick, K. (1969). Social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
West Churchman, C. (1970). The artificiality of science. PsycCRITIQUES, 15(6), 385–386.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jonas, W. (2018). Systems Design Thinking: Theoretical, Methodological, and Methodical Considerations. A German Narrative. In: Jones, P., Kijima, K. (eds) Systemic Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55638-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55639-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)