Skip to main content

The Philippine ICT Industry and the Middle Income Trap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative ICT Industrial Architecture in East Asia

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 17))

  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter constitutes a macroanalysis of the Philippine Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector, which has come to be a critical part of the country’s economic development. It investigates the role of this sector in relation to the (lower) Middle Income Trap (MIT), which is considered as a major factor for the generally poor performance of the Philippines since the end of the world war. The analysis focuses on two structural phenomena that have been associated with the MIT: early deindustrialization and product trap. To this end, the ICT sector is divided into the soft portion corresponding to the services sector and the hard portion corresponding to the manufacturing sector. The soft portion analysis uses the three Kaldorian laws to investigate whether or not the early deindustrialization is premature (bad) or precocious (good). The hard portion analysis uses product space proximity and input-output tables to assess the nature of the product trap in the Philippines. The general conclusion is that there is a need for a strategic look at the ICT sector, especially with regards to the very real possibility that the ICT industry poses the risks of slowing down the growth of the Philippines through premature deindustrialization and a product trap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Figure 7.3 of Chap. 7 is essentially the starting point of this chapter. While Chap. 7 concentrated on the left portion of Fig. 7.3 (i.e., the keiretsu features of satellite organization and redistributive interventionism), the current chapter concentrates on the right part of Fig. 7.3 (i.e., the ICT-related risks of the product trap and premature deindustrialization).

  2. 2.

    In a review of their 2012 paper, Felipe et al. (2014) conclude that there is no Middle Income Trap and rephrases the “low-level equilibrium” issue as a matter of slow or fast transition from one income category. While using the same income categories, Felipe et al. (2014) redefine the threshold number of years in an income category by considering the East Asian Miracle countries as outliers, leading to the conclusion that the Philippines is not in a slow transition track. In this paper, we choose, however, to use Felipe et al. (2012) since it probes more deeply into the possible differences between countries in and out of the “trap” and does not, in our opinion, underestimate the severity of the economic problem of the Philippines.

  3. 3.

    The Philippines is often said to be the only Latin American country in Asia, because of the similarity in economic problems.

  4. 4.

    Tregenna (2011)gives a long list of recent studies that empirically support the Kaldorian/Structuralist assertion of manufacturing as a vital engine of growth: Atesoglu (1993), Bairam (1991), Behesti and Sadighnia (2006), Bernat (1996), Diaz Bautista (2003), Drakopoulos and Theodossiou (1991), Felipe (1998), Fingleton and McCombie (1998), Hansen and Zhang (1996), Harris and Lau (1998), Harris and Liu (1999), Knell (2004), Leon-Ledesma (2000), Necmi (2000), Pons-Novell and Viladecans-Marsal (1999), and Wells and Thirlwall (2003).

  5. 5.

    For example, the technologies and endowments of weaving in the textile industry can be used to develop the automotive industry. In this case, the two industries have high proximity.

  6. 6.

    The more detailed results are given in the Appendix. There is no attempt in our analysis to go into a structural analysis of the Kaldorian Laws. Our aim is simply to identify patterns in the variables that are indicated by the Kaldorian Laws.

  7. 7.

    This relationship can be shown as follows. From the 1st Law, Y = a1 + a2 X. This implies that (1−a2) Y = a1 + a2 (XY) or Y = (a1 + a2 (XY))/(1−a2). If a2 < 1, then (1−a2) > 0. In which case, when X > Y, then Y > 0. On the other hand, if a2 > 1, then (1−a2) < 0. In this case, it becomes possible for Y to be negative when XY is positive.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.chidalgo.com/productspace/index.htm

  9. 9.

    Satellite organization refers to a corporate organization which branches out across different fields that need not be directly related to each other. The branch is similar to a satellite which has a degree of independence from the head office.

  10. 10.

    Redistributive interventionism is part of the so-called convoy system of Japanese capitalism, wherein the stronger firms help out weaker affiliates. This would involve a wide variety of intervention, such as dispatching technical advisers, selective lending, and procurement at special prices, so as to assist an affiliate experiencing short-term difficulties.

References

  • Atesoglu H (1993) Manufacturing and economic growth in the United States. Appl Econ 25(1):67–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairam E (1991) Economic growth and Kaldor’s law: the case of Turkey, 1925–78. Appl Econ 23(8):1277–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behesti M, Sadighnia R (2006) Testing Kaldor’s engine of growth hypothesis in Iran’s economy. Q Iran Econ Res 28:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernat G (1996) Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor’s laws. J Reg Sci 36(3):463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Bautista A (2003) Mexico’s industrial engine of growth: cointegration and causality. Momento Economico 126:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakopoulos S, Theodossiou I (1991) Kaldorian approach to Greek economic growth. Appl Econ 23(10):1683–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe J (1998) The role of the manufacturing sector in Southeast Asian development: a test of Kaldor’s first law. J Post Keynesian Econ 20(3):463–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe J, Abdon A, Kumar U (2012) Tracking the, middle-income trap: what is it, who is in it, and why. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe J, Kumar U, Galope R (2014) Middle-income transitions: trap or myth? Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series 421

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B, McCombie JSL (1998) Increasing returns and economic growth: some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions. Oxf Econ Pap 50(1):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill I, Kharas H (2007) An East Asian renaissance: ideas for economic growth. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Zhang J (1996) A Kaldorian approach to regional economic growth in China. Appl Econ 28(6):679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Lau E (1998) Verdoorn’s law and increasing returns to scale in the UK regions, 1968–91: some new estimates based on the cointegration approach. Oxf Econ Pap 50(2):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Liu A (1999) Verdoorn’s law and increasing returns to scale: country estimates based on the cointegration approach. Appl Econ Lett 6(1):29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási A, Hausmann R (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317(5837):482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO Website, Key indicators of the labour market database. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • JETRO (2012) Firipin no denshi sangyo: shijou chousa houkokusho (Manira hatsu) (Philippine electronics industry: market survey report (from Manila)). http://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/jfile/report/07000935/report_MLA_1203.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2015

  • Knell M (2004) Structural change and the Kaldor-Verdoorn law in the 1990s. Rev Econ Ind 105:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Ledesma M (2000) Economic growth and Verdoorn’s law in the Spanish regions, 1962–91. Int Rev Appl Econ 14(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Necmi S (2000) Kaldor’s growth analysis revisited. Appl Econ 31(5):653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippine Statistics Authority (2007) Understanding the business process outsourcing (BPO) industry in the Philippines, posted November 9. http://www.nscb.gov.ph/factsheet/pdf07/FS-200711-ES2-01_BPO.asp#2. Accessed 10 Aug 2015

  • Pons-Novell EJ, Viladecans-Marsal E (1999) Kaldor’s laws and spatial dependence: evidence for European regions. Reg Stud 33(5):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn R, Rawasmamy R (1999) Growth, trade, and industrialization. IMF Staff Papers 46

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn R, Wells J (1987) De-industrialization and foreign trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago E (2011) The Philippine ICT: the green IT. Presented in Asia Green IT Forum organized by Green IT Promotion Council on October 27, Seoul. http://home.jeita.or.jp/greenit-pc/e/events/asia/asia2011_en.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2015

  • Tregenna F (2011) Manufacturing productivity, deindustrialization, and reindustrialization. UNU-WIDER Working Paper, 2011/57 September

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2003) Trade and development report: capital accumulation, growth, and structural change. United Nations, New York/Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells H, Thirlwall PA (2003) Testing Kaldor’s laws across the countries of Africa. Afr Dev Rev 15(2–3):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993) The East Asian miracle: economic growth and public policy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinand C. Maquito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

8.1.1 Kaldor Law Estimates (By Author) (Appendix Tables 8.8a, 8.8b, 8.8c, 8.8d, 8.8e, 8.8f, 8.8g, 8.8h, and 8.8i)

Table 8.8a 1st Kaldor law test for agriculture
Table 8.8b 1st Kaldor law test for industry
Table 8.8c 1st Kaldor law test for services
Table 8.8d 3rd Kaldor law test for agriculture
Table 8.8e 3rd Kaldor law test for industry
Table 8.8f 3rd Kaldor law test for services
Table 8.8g 2nd Kaldor law test for agriculture
Table 8.8h 2nd Kaldor law test for industry
Table 8.8i 2nd Kaldor law test for services

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maquito, F.C. (2017). The Philippine ICT Industry and the Middle Income Trap. In: Hirakawa, H., Takahashi, N., Maquito, F., Tokumaru, N. (eds) Innovative ICT Industrial Architecture in East Asia. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 17. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55630-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics