Skip to main content

Understanding Innovation in Production Networks in Firms in the People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the Philippines

  • Chapter
Production Networks and Enterprises in East Asia

Part of the book series: ADB Institute Series on Development Economics ((ADBISDE))

Abstract

This chapter explores the “black box” of innovation in the electronics production network in East Asia through a mapping exercise of technological capabilities and an econometric analysis of exporting in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Thailand, and the Philippines. Technology-based approaches to trade offer a plausible explanation for firm-level exporting behavior and complement the literature on production networks. The econometric results confirm the importance of foreign ownership and innovation in increasing the probability of exporting in electronics. Higher levels of skills, managers’ education, and capital also matter in the PRC as well as accumulated experience in Thailand. Furthermore, a technology index composed of technical functions performed by firms (to represent technological capabilities) emerges as a more robust indicator of innovation than the research and development (R&D) to sales ratio. Accordingly, technological effort in electronics in these countries mostly focuses on assimilating and using imported technologies rather than formal R&D by specialized engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Others include Rasiah (2003) on Malaysia and Thailand, and Wignaraja (2008a) on the PRC and Sri Lanka.

  2. 2.

    Several taxonomies exist. For instance, Dahlman et al. (1987) categorize technological capabilities into production, investment, and innovation. Romjin (1997) develops a simple classification system based on the complexity of products. Making a distinction between competencies and capabilities, Iammarino et al. (2008) distinguish two types of technological capabilities—process organization and product centered. Each taxonomy is useful depending on the purpose at hand.

  3. 3.

    For a selection, see Pietrobelli (1997) on Chile, Wignaraja (1998) on Sri Lanka, Deraniyagala and Semboja (1999) on Tanzania, Wignaraja (2002) on Mauritius, Wignaraja (2008a) on the PRC and Sri Lanka, and Warren-Rodriguez (2010) on Mozambique.

  4. 4.

    A related strand of econometric literature also uses TIs to explore determinants of firm-level technological capabilities. Examples include Wignaraja (2008b) on Sri Lanka, Iammarino et al. (2008) on Mexico, and Warren-Rodriguez (2010) on Mozambique.

  5. 5.

    Rasiah (2003, 2004) employs a simple process capability measure consisting of four items: equipment, machinery, information technology components and quality control instruments. Furthermore, equipment and machinery are measured by logistic variables based on their average age, ICT is measured using a Likert scale of 1–5, and quality control by a dummy variable.

  6. 6.

    This means that all population units are grouped within a homogenous group and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specific level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. In most developing countries, small and medium-sized enterprises form the bulk of the enterprises. Large firms are oversampled in the firm surveys as they tend to be engines of job creation. For more details of the sampling methodology see www.enterprisesurveys.org/methodology

  7. 7.

    Data availability on technical functions performed by firms in the World Bank Enterprise Surveys on the PRC, Thailand, and the Philippines influenced the construction of the TI. The TI is based on the nine technical functions that were common to all three enterprise samples.

  8. 8.

    24 % of PRC firms, 26 % of Thai firms, and 21 % of Philippine firms.

  9. 9.

    The correlation matrix indicated that there appears to be a significant positive collinearity between TI and FOR in Thailand and the Philippines. The variance-inflation factor and condition indices tests suggest that there is no serious problem of multicollinearity.

References

  • Ando, M., and F. Kimura. 2005. The formation of international production and distribution networks in East Asia. In International trade in East Asia, NBER-East Asia seminar on economics, ed. T. Ito and A.K. Rose, vol. 14, 177–216. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala, P. 2011. Production networks and trade patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or globalization? Asian Economic Papers 10(1): 65–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.E. 2008. Managing the noodle bowl: The fragility of East Asian regionalism. Singapore Economic Review 53(3): 449–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1993. Technological accumulation and industrial growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 2(2): 157–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., J.B. Jensen, S.J. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2007. Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, S., and A. Ray. 2004. Exporting through technological capability: Econometric evidence from India’s pharmaceutical and electrical/electronics firms. Oxford Development Studies 32(1): 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99(4): 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C.J., B. Ross-Larson, and L.E. Westphal. 1987. Managing technological development: Lessons from newly industrializing countries. World Development 15(6): 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, J., K.L. Kraemer, and G. Linden. 2010. Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(1): 81–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deraniyagala, S., and H. Semboja. 1999. Trade liberalization, firm performance and technology upgrading in Tanzania. In The technological response to import liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa, ed. S. Lall. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippetti, A., and A. Peyrache. 2011. The patterns of technological capabilities of countries: A dual approach using composite indicators and data envelopment analysis. World Development 39(7): 1108–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X. 2011. Processing trade, FDI and the exports of indigenous firms: Firm-level evidence from technology-intensive industries in China. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 73(6): 792–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H.A., A. Jaquemin, and J. Petit. 1980. Exports in an imperfect competition framework: An analysis of 1446 exporters. Quarterly Journal of Economics XCIV: 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1994. Technology and trade. NBER working paper no. W4926. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., and N. Ma. 2003. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation 23(9): 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, D., and Y. Uchida (eds.). 2010. Input trade and production networks in East Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S., and H. Bijaoui. 1985. R & D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121: 238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. 1995. Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. 2001. The electronics industries of the Asia-Pacific: Explaining international production networks for economic development. Asia-Pacific Economic Literature 15(1): 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., R. Padilla-Perez, and N. von Tunzelmann. 2008. Technological capabilities and global-local interactions: The electronics industry in two Mexican regions. World Development 36(10): 1980–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroiwa, I., and T.M. Heng (eds.). 2008. Production networks and industrial clusters: Integrating economies in Southeast Asia. Singapore/Tokyo: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. 1987. Learning to industrialize. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development 20: 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S., G. Barba-Navaretti, S. Teitel, and G. Wignaraja. 1984. Technology and enterprise development: Ghana under structural adjustment. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A. (ed.). 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A., and D. Cho. 2002. Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. 2003. The impact of trade on Intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. 2008. Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C. 1997. Industry, competitiveness and technological capabilities in Chile: A new tiger from Latin America. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah, R. 2003. Foreign ownership, technology and electronics exports from Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics 14: 785–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah, R. 2004. Foreign firms, technological intensities and economic performance, evidence from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romjin, H. 1997. Acquisition of technological capability in development: A quantitative case study of Pakistan’s capital goods sector. World Development 25(3): 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.N., and V. Archana. 2011. Determinants of export decision of firms. Economic and Political Weekly 46(7): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T., and M. Kawakami. 2010. Global value chains in the electronics industry: Was the crisis a window of opportunity for developing countries. In Global value chains in a postcrisis world, ed. O. Cattaneo, G. Gereffi, and C. Staritz. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, A., and H. Wan Jr. 2013. Chinese electronics export—the win-win outcome along the evolving global value chain. The World Economy. doi:10.1111/twec.12045.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. 2002/2003. World industrial development report: Competing through innovation. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Rodriguez, A. 2010. Uncovering trends in the accumulation of technological capabilities and skills in the Mozambican manufacturing sector. Oxford Development Studies 38(2): 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin, K. 1997. Trade and innovation: Theory and evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., X. Liu, and C. Wang. 2008. Mutual productivity spillovers between foreign and local firms in China. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32(4): 609–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, L.E., K. Kritayakirana, K. Petchsuwan, H. Sutabutr, and Y. Yuthavong. 1990. The development of technological capability in manufacturing: A macroscopic approach to policy research. In Science and technology: Lessons for development policy, ed. R.E. Evenson and G. Rani. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, L.E. 2002. Technology strategies for economic development. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11: 275–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 1998. Trade liberalization in Sri Lanka: Exports, technology and industrial policy. London/New York: Macmillan Press/St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 2002. Firm size, technological capabilities and market-oriented policies in Mauritius. Oxford Development Studies 30(1): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 2008a. Ownership, technology and buyers: Explaining exporting in China and Sri Lanka. Transnational Corporations 17(2): 1–15. August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 2008b. Foreign ownership, technological capabilities and clothing exports in Sri Lanka. Journal of Asian Economics 19(1): 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 2011. Economic reforms, regionalism and exports: Comparing China and India, East West Center policy studies, vol. 60. Honolulu: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, G. 2012. Innovation, learning and exporting in China: Does R&D or a technology index matter? Journal of Asian Economics 23(3): 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore, L. 1992. Transnationals and foreign trade: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Studies 28(2): 314–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., and H. Li. 1997. R&D and exports: An empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 8(1): 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganeshan Wignaraja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Asian Development Bank Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wignaraja, G. (2016). Understanding Innovation in Production Networks in Firms in the People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the Philippines. In: Wignaraja, G. (eds) Production Networks and Enterprises in East Asia. ADB Institute Series on Development Economics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55498-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics