Abstract
This chapter explores the “black box” of innovation in the electronics production network in East Asia through a mapping exercise of technological capabilities and an econometric analysis of exporting in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Thailand, and the Philippines. Technology-based approaches to trade offer a plausible explanation for firm-level exporting behavior and complement the literature on production networks. The econometric results confirm the importance of foreign ownership and innovation in increasing the probability of exporting in electronics. Higher levels of skills, managers’ education, and capital also matter in the PRC as well as accumulated experience in Thailand. Furthermore, a technology index composed of technical functions performed by firms (to represent technological capabilities) emerges as a more robust indicator of innovation than the research and development (R&D) to sales ratio. Accordingly, technological effort in electronics in these countries mostly focuses on assimilating and using imported technologies rather than formal R&D by specialized engineers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Several taxonomies exist. For instance, Dahlman et al. (1987) categorize technological capabilities into production, investment, and innovation. Romjin (1997) develops a simple classification system based on the complexity of products. Making a distinction between competencies and capabilities, Iammarino et al. (2008) distinguish two types of technological capabilities—process organization and product centered. Each taxonomy is useful depending on the purpose at hand.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Rasiah (2003, 2004) employs a simple process capability measure consisting of four items: equipment, machinery, information technology components and quality control instruments. Furthermore, equipment and machinery are measured by logistic variables based on their average age, ICT is measured using a Likert scale of 1–5, and quality control by a dummy variable.
- 6.
This means that all population units are grouped within a homogenous group and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specific level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. In most developing countries, small and medium-sized enterprises form the bulk of the enterprises. Large firms are oversampled in the firm surveys as they tend to be engines of job creation. For more details of the sampling methodology see www.enterprisesurveys.org/methodology
- 7.
Data availability on technical functions performed by firms in the World Bank Enterprise Surveys on the PRC, Thailand, and the Philippines influenced the construction of the TI. The TI is based on the nine technical functions that were common to all three enterprise samples.
- 8.
24 % of PRC firms, 26 % of Thai firms, and 21 % of Philippine firms.
- 9.
The correlation matrix indicated that there appears to be a significant positive collinearity between TI and FOR in Thailand and the Philippines. The variance-inflation factor and condition indices tests suggest that there is no serious problem of multicollinearity.
References
Ando, M., and F. Kimura. 2005. The formation of international production and distribution networks in East Asia. In International trade in East Asia, NBER-East Asia seminar on economics, ed. T. Ito and A.K. Rose, vol. 14, 177–216. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Athukorala, P. 2011. Production networks and trade patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or globalization? Asian Economic Papers 10(1): 65–95.
Baldwin, R.E. 2008. Managing the noodle bowl: The fragility of East Asian regionalism. Singapore Economic Review 53(3): 449–478.
Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1993. Technological accumulation and industrial growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 2(2): 157–209.
Bernard, A.B., J.B. Jensen, S.J. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2007. Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 105–130.
Bhaduri, S., and A. Ray. 2004. Exporting through technological capability: Econometric evidence from India’s pharmaceutical and electrical/electronics firms. Oxford Development Studies 32(1): 87–100.
Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99(4): 569–596.
Dahlman, C.J., B. Ross-Larson, and L.E. Westphal. 1987. Managing technological development: Lessons from newly industrializing countries. World Development 15(6): 759–775.
Dedrick, J., K.L. Kraemer, and G. Linden. 2010. Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(1): 81–116.
Deraniyagala, S., and H. Semboja. 1999. Trade liberalization, firm performance and technology upgrading in Tanzania. In The technological response to import liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa, ed. S. Lall. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Filippetti, A., and A. Peyrache. 2011. The patterns of technological capabilities of countries: A dual approach using composite indicators and data envelopment analysis. World Development 39(7): 1108–1121.
Fu, X. 2011. Processing trade, FDI and the exports of indigenous firms: Firm-level evidence from technology-intensive industries in China. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 73(6): 792–817.
Glejser, H.A., A. Jaquemin, and J. Petit. 1980. Exports in an imperfect competition framework: An analysis of 1446 exporters. Quarterly Journal of Economics XCIV: 507–524.
Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1994. Technology and trade. NBER working paper no. W4926. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Guan, J., and N. Ma. 2003. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation 23(9): 737–747.
Hiratsuka, D., and Y. Uchida (eds.). 2010. Input trade and production networks in East Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hirsch, S., and H. Bijaoui. 1985. R & D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121: 238–251.
Hobday, M. 1995. Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan. London: Edward Elgar.
Hobday, M. 2001. The electronics industries of the Asia-Pacific: Explaining international production networks for economic development. Asia-Pacific Economic Literature 15(1): 13–29.
Iammarino, S., R. Padilla-Perez, and N. von Tunzelmann. 2008. Technological capabilities and global-local interactions: The electronics industry in two Mexican regions. World Development 36(10): 1980–2003.
Kuroiwa, I., and T.M. Heng (eds.). 2008. Production networks and industrial clusters: Integrating economies in Southeast Asia. Singapore/Tokyo: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.
Lall, S. 1987. Learning to industrialize. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development 20: 165–186.
Lall, S., G. Barba-Navaretti, S. Teitel, and G. Wignaraja. 1984. Technology and enterprise development: Ghana under structural adjustment. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Lundvall, B.A. (ed.). 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Mathews, J.A., and D. Cho. 2002. Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Melitz, M.J. 2003. The impact of trade on Intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725.
Nelson, R.R. 2008. Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 9–21.
Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.
Pietrobelli, C. 1997. Industry, competitiveness and technological capabilities in Chile: A new tiger from Latin America. London: Macmillan.
Rasiah, R. 2003. Foreign ownership, technology and electronics exports from Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics 14: 785–811.
Rasiah, R. 2004. Foreign firms, technological intensities and economic performance, evidence from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Romjin, H. 1997. Acquisition of technological capability in development: A quantitative case study of Pakistan’s capital goods sector. World Development 25(3): 359–377.
Srinivasan, T.N., and V. Archana. 2011. Determinants of export decision of firms. Economic and Political Weekly 46(7): 49–58.
Sturgeon, T., and M. Kawakami. 2010. Global value chains in the electronics industry: Was the crisis a window of opportunity for developing countries. In Global value chains in a postcrisis world, ed. O. Cattaneo, G. Gereffi, and C. Staritz. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Tung, A., and H. Wan Jr. 2013. Chinese electronics export—the win-win outcome along the evolving global value chain. The World Economy. doi:10.1111/twec.12045.
UNIDO. 2002/2003. World industrial development report: Competing through innovation. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Warren-Rodriguez, A. 2010. Uncovering trends in the accumulation of technological capabilities and skills in the Mozambican manufacturing sector. Oxford Development Studies 38(2): 171–198.
Wakelin, K. 1997. Trade and innovation: Theory and evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wei, Y., X. Liu, and C. Wang. 2008. Mutual productivity spillovers between foreign and local firms in China. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32(4): 609–631.
Westphal, L.E., K. Kritayakirana, K. Petchsuwan, H. Sutabutr, and Y. Yuthavong. 1990. The development of technological capability in manufacturing: A macroscopic approach to policy research. In Science and technology: Lessons for development policy, ed. R.E. Evenson and G. Rani. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Westphal, L.E. 2002. Technology strategies for economic development. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11: 275–320.
Wignaraja, G. 1998. Trade liberalization in Sri Lanka: Exports, technology and industrial policy. London/New York: Macmillan Press/St. Martin’s Press.
Wignaraja, G. 2002. Firm size, technological capabilities and market-oriented policies in Mauritius. Oxford Development Studies 30(1): 87–104.
Wignaraja, G. 2008a. Ownership, technology and buyers: Explaining exporting in China and Sri Lanka. Transnational Corporations 17(2): 1–15. August.
Wignaraja, G. 2008b. Foreign ownership, technological capabilities and clothing exports in Sri Lanka. Journal of Asian Economics 19(1): 29–39.
Wignaraja, G. 2011. Economic reforms, regionalism and exports: Comparing China and India, East West Center policy studies, vol. 60. Honolulu: East-West Center.
Wignaraja, G. 2012. Innovation, learning and exporting in China: Does R&D or a technology index matter? Journal of Asian Economics 23(3): 224–233.
Wilmore, L. 1992. Transnationals and foreign trade: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Studies 28(2): 314–335.
Zhao, H., and H. Li. 1997. R&D and exports: An empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 8(1): 89–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Asian Development Bank Institute
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wignaraja, G. (2016). Understanding Innovation in Production Networks in Firms in the People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the Philippines. In: Wignaraja, G. (eds) Production Networks and Enterprises in East Asia. ADB Institute Series on Development Economics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55498-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55498-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55497-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55498-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)