Abstract
Players are motivated by social norms and morale to exert extra efforts in a work place with high morale. However, we often observe that the initially high performance of an organization gradually declines. In order to seek for an optimal wage incentive system, we have constructed an agent-based model with a small group of heterogeneous or homogeneous workers. The model has the following features: players’ behavior is subject to random shocks; inertia effect is introduced; and players are rewarded on the basis of their performances. The virtual experiment demonstrates that an organization, consisting of homogenous players, is more viable against the erosion than that with heterogeneous players, and that an organization with homogenous players is far more vulnerable to the erosion than that with heterogeneous players when subject to random shocks. Interestingly, an organization with heterogeneous agents can enjoy high morale among players that allows them to maintain high performance. We also show that the reward incentive is remarkably effective in any organization and it is particularly powerful in homogenous organizations. We have compared the two personnel rating systems: one based upon the level of performance relative to other workers’ contemporaneous ones and the other upon her own past performance. In inducing higher performance of the workers, the latter system excels the former for the heterogeneous organization, whereas the former system will outperform for the homogeneous one.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100(401):464–477
Colquitt JA, Noe RA, Jackson CL (2002) Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Pers Psychol 55(1):83–109
Dorfman PW, Stephan WG (1984) The effects of group performance on cognitions, satisfaction, and behavior: a process model. J Manag 10(2):173–192
Heneman RL, Hippel CV (1995) Balancing group and individual rewards: rewarding individual contributions to the team. Compens Benefits Rev 27(4):63–68
Kandori M (2003) The erosion and sustainability of norms and morale. Jpn Econ Rev 54:29–48
Katz LF (1986) Efficiency wage theories: a partial evaluation. In: Fischer S (ed) NBER macroeconomics annual 1986, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 235–290
Ross TL, Hatcher L, Collins D (1992) Why employees support (and oppose) gainsharing plans. Compens Benefits Manag 8:17–27
Scott KD, Floyd J, Benson PG, Bishop JW (2002) The impact of the Scanlon plan on retail store performance. WorldatWork 11(3):18–27
Sirota D, Mischkind LA, Meltzer IM (2006) Why your employees are losing motivation. Harv Manag 11(1).http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/5289.html
Acknowledgments
This capture was partially supported by Kakenhi 22510160, 22530284, and 26330387. We also thank the reviewers for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this paper
Cite this paper
Okada, I., Takahashi, I. (2015). Exploring Optimal Wage Incentive System Using ABS. In: Nakai, Y., Koyama, Y., Terano, T. (eds) Agent-Based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems VIII. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 13. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55236-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55236-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55235-2
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55236-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)