Abstract
The importance of ecosystem services has been widely accepted since the publication of both the United Nations 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, which assess future scenarios with and without ecosystem services, respectively. To sustainably maintain ecosystem services, assessment of the current state of ecosystem services together with the development of sound management practices are needed at both local and national/regional scales. In the monitoring of biodiversity, coarse-filter indicators are preferred as forest biodiversity indicators, although assessments based on fine-filter indicators should be included if possible because overall forest architecture is not necessarily correlated with species and genetic diversity in the forest. A variety of computer-based tools for ecosystem service assessment are available, although none of these is specialized for the forest ecosystem and for Asian survey. To develop ecosystem service monitoring at a larger (e.g., national) scale, it is ideal to select indicators based on the analysis of monitoring results of fine-scale indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156
CBD (2001) Global biodiversity outlook. CBD, Montreal
CBD (2006) Global biodiversity outlook 2. CBD, Montreal
CBD (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. CBD, Montreal
Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services. Island Press, Washington, DC
de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408
Dobson A, Lodge D, Alder J, Cumming GS, Keymer J, McGlade J, Mooney H, Rusak JM, Sala O, Wolters V, Wall D, Winfree R, Xenopoulos MA (2006) Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology 87:1915–1924
Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494
Failing L, Gregory R (2003) Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Environ Manag 68:121–132
FAO (2002) Proceedings: second expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4171e/y4171e00.HTM
FAO (2010) FAO forestry paper 163. FAO, Rome
FAO (2011) Assessing forest degradation. Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 177. FAO, Rome.
Gillard P (1967) Coprophagous beetles in pasture ecosystems. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 33:30–34
Guariguata MR, Balvanera P (2009) Tropical forest service flows: improving our understanding of the biophysical dimension of ecosystem services. For Ecol Manag 258:1825–1829
Hougner C, Colding J, Soderqvist T (2006) Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecol Econ 59:364–374
Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Landis DA, Gurr GM (2008) Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods. Biol Control 45:172–175
Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:303–313
Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know? Ecol Lett 8:468–479
Kumar P, Muradian R (2009) Payment for ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950
Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323
Lund HG (2009) What is a degradation forest? Forest Information Service, Gainsville
Lyytimaki J, Sipila M (2009) Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Green 8:309–315
MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC
Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320:1454–1455
MOE (2007) National strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. http://www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/about/initiatives3/index.html
MOE (2010) Japan Biodiversity Outlook. www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/activity/policy/jbo/jbo/files/allin.pdf‎ (in Japanese)
Natural Capital Project (2012) InVEST. http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/InVEST.html. Accessed 21 February 2012
Noss RF (1987) From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol Conserv 41:11–37
Okabe K, Ogawa M (2011) History and future perspective of monitoring of forest biodiversity. Bull FFPRI 10:231–250
Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326
Peres CA (2000) Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conserv Biol 14:240–253
Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. Bioscience 42:412–422
Rodriguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork SJ, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11:28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/
Sodhi NS, Brool BW (2006) Southeast Asian biodiversity in crisis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Taki H, Okabe K, Yamaura Y, Matsuura T, Sueyoshi M, Makino S, Maeto K (2010) Effects of landscape metrics on Apis and non-Apis pollinators and seed set in common buckwheat. Basic Appl Ecol 11:594–602
Taki H, Yamaura Y, Okabe K, Maeto K (2011) Plantation vs. natural forest: matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields. Sci Rep. http://www.nature.com/srep/2011/111028/srep00132/full/srep00132.html
Thies C, Tscharntke T (1999) Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285:893–895
Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn N, Parrotta JA, Nasi R (2011) Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. Bioscience 61:972–981
USDA (2009) Urban Natural Resources Stewardship. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/urban/monitoring/tools_ecosystem_services/. Accessed 20 February 2012.
Yamaura Y, Amano T, Koizumi T, Mitsuda Y, Taki H, Okabe K (2009) Does land-use change affect biodiversity dynamics at a macroecological scale? A case study of birds over the past 20 years in Japan. Anim Conserv 12:110–119
Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260
Acknowledgments
The study was partly supported by the Global Environment Research Fund S9 and D-1008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okabe, K., Taki, H. (2014). Monitoring Changes in Ecosystem Services Within a Forest Ecosystem. In: Nakano, Si., Yahara, T., Nakashizuka, T. (eds) Integrative Observations and Assessments. Ecological Research Monographs(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54783-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54783-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54782-2
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54783-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)