Skip to main content

Monitoring Changes in Ecosystem Services Within a Forest Ecosystem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrative Observations and Assessments

Part of the book series: Ecological Research Monographs ((APBON))

  • 1072 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of ecosystem services has been widely accepted since the publication of both the United Nations 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, which assess future scenarios with and without ecosystem services, respectively. To sustainably maintain ecosystem services, assessment of the current state of ecosystem services together with the development of sound management practices are needed at both local and national/regional scales. In the monitoring of biodiversity, coarse-filter indicators are preferred as forest biodiversity indicators, although assessments based on fine-filter indicators should be included if possible because overall forest architecture is not necessarily correlated with species and genetic diversity in the forest. A variety of computer-based tools for ecosystem service assessment are available, although none of these is specialized for the forest ecosystem and for Asian survey. To develop ecosystem service monitoring at a larger (e.g., national) scale, it is ideal to select indicators based on the analysis of monitoring results of fine-scale indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2001) Global biodiversity outlook. CBD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2006) Global biodiversity outlook 2. CBD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. CBD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A, Lodge D, Alder J, Cumming GS, Keymer J, McGlade J, Mooney H, Rusak JM, Sala O, Wolters V, Wall D, Winfree R, Xenopoulos MA (2006) Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology 87:1915–1924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Failing L, Gregory R (2003) Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Environ Manag 68:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) Proceedings: second expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4171e/y4171e00.HTM

  • FAO (2010) FAO forestry paper 163. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011) Assessing forest degradation. Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 177. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillard P (1967) Coprophagous beetles in pasture ecosystems. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 33:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Guariguata MR, Balvanera P (2009) Tropical forest service flows: improving our understanding of the biophysical dimension of ecosystem services. For Ecol Manag 258:1825–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hougner C, Colding J, Soderqvist T (2006) Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecol Econ 59:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Landis DA, Gurr GM (2008) Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods. Biol Control 45:172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know? Ecol Lett 8:468–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Muradian R (2009) Payment for ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund HG (2009) What is a degradation forest? Forest Information Service, Gainsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimaki J, Sipila M (2009) Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Green 8:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320:1454–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2007) National strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. http://www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/about/initiatives3/index.html

  • MOE (2010) Japan Biodiversity Outlook. www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/activity/policy/jbo/jbo/files/allin.pdf‎ (in Japanese)

  • Natural Capital Project (2012) InVEST. http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/InVEST.html. Accessed 21 February 2012

  • Noss RF (1987) From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol Conserv 41:11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe K, Ogawa M (2011) History and future perspective of monitoring of forest biodiversity. Bull FFPRI 10:231–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres CA (2000) Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conserv Biol 14:240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. Bioscience 42:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork SJ, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11:28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/

  • Sodhi NS, Brool BW (2006) Southeast Asian biodiversity in crisis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Okabe K, Yamaura Y, Matsuura T, Sueyoshi M, Makino S, Maeto K (2010) Effects of landscape metrics on Apis and non-Apis pollinators and seed set in common buckwheat. Basic Appl Ecol 11:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Yamaura Y, Okabe K, Maeto K (2011) Plantation vs. natural forest: matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields. Sci Rep. http://www.nature.com/srep/2011/111028/srep00132/full/srep00132.html

  • Thies C, Tscharntke T (1999) Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285:893–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn N, Parrotta JA, Nasi R (2011) Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. Bioscience 61:972–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2009) Urban Natural Resources Stewardship. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/urban/monitoring/tools_ecosystem_services/. Accessed 20 February 2012.

  • Yamaura Y, Amano T, Koizumi T, Mitsuda Y, Taki H, Okabe K (2009) Does land-use change affect biodiversity dynamics at a macroecological scale? A case study of birds over the past 20 years in Japan. Anim Conserv 12:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was partly supported by the Global Environment Research Fund S9 and D-1008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimiko Okabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Okabe, K., Taki, H. (2014). Monitoring Changes in Ecosystem Services Within a Forest Ecosystem. In: Nakano, Si., Yahara, T., Nakashizuka, T. (eds) Integrative Observations and Assessments. Ecological Research Monographs(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54783-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics