Keywords

1 Introduction

On March 11, 2011, the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) was hit and damaged by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake in the Northwest Pacific about 130 km off the northeast coast of Japan and the following gigantic tsunami. As a result, large amounts of radionuclides were released into the atmosphere and directly discharged into the sea. More than 70 % of the released radionuclides were deposited over the North Pacific Ocean [1]. Studies concerning the fission products, such as 131I and radiocesium, were carried out intensively after the nuclear accident. However, information about actinides, especially the plutonium (Pu) isotopes, is limited.

Pu isotopes are of public and scientific interest because they are characterized by radiotoxicity and strong chemical toxicity. They contribute much to the long-term dose for humans because of their relatively long half-lives (238Pu, 87.7 years; 239Pu, 24,110 years; 240Pu, 6,561 years; 241Pu, 14.4 years). Investigating the characterization of Pu isotopes in marine sediments is important for purposes of environmental monitoring and radiotoxicity assessment. Moreover, Pu isotopes are considered as new geochemical tracers for the study of oceanic processes, such as sedimentation and particle scavenging, and the isotopic composition of Pu (240Pu/239Pu) has been used as an important fingerprint for environmental radioactive source identification [25].

Abnormal atom ratios of 240Pu/239Pu and 241Pu/239Pu, and activity ratios of 241Pu/239+240Pu and 238Pu/239+240Pu, have been reported in surface soil and litter samples in the 20- to 30-km zone around the FDNPP [6, 7], suggesting the atmospheric release of Pu isotopes from the nuclear accident. For the marine environment, in previous studies [8, 9] we investigated the distribution of Pu isotopes in marine sediments collected in the Pacific Ocean, 30 km off the FDNPP site, from July 2011 to July 2012 after the nuclear accident. Sakaguchi et al. [10] determined Pu concentration in seawaters in the Pacific, 50 km off the FDNPP, and they observed no significant amount of extra components from the nuclear accident. However, possible long-term Pu contamination from the nuclear accident in the marine environment, especially in the Japanese near-coastal (within 30 km) marine environment, remains unknown because so far no information on Pu isotopes in the released radioactive liquid and in the FDNPP near-coastal marine environment is available.

Pu isotopes are particle reactive and can be easily incorporated into the sediments in the marine environment. Radiocesium (134Cs and 137Cs) released from the FDNPP accident was detected in sinking particles collected from the deep sea in the Western North Pacific 1 month after the accident [11]. The sediment–water distribution coefficient of Pu is two orders of magnitude higher than that of Cs [12]. Thus, Pu could be more easily incorporated into the sediments, and Pu distribution in the marine sediments could give direct information about Pu contamination in the marine environment.

In this review, we first summarize studies about the distribution of Pu isotopes in the marine sediments off Japan before and after the FDNPP accident. Then, we compare the results to assess possible contamination by Pu from the FDNPP accident. Perspectives about future research are presented as well.

2 Distribution of Pu Isotopes in the Marine Sediments off Japan Before the Accident

During past decades, the distribution of Pu isotopes in the Western North Pacific and its marginal seas have been studied intensively because of the potential application of Pu isotopes as geochemical tracers for oceanic processes and source identification of radioactive contamination. Before the FDNPP accident, Pu isotopes in the Western North Pacific off Japan originated from global fallout and the oceanic current-transported Pacific Proving Ground (PPG) close-in fallout. Global fallout Pu has been characterized by a 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio of 0.18 and a 241Pu/239Pu atom ratio of 0.0011 [13]. (For all the values discussed in this study, 241Pu decay corrections have been made to March 11, 2011.) However, the PPG close-in fallout has higher Pu isotopic composition values (240Pu/239Pu atom ratio, 0.30–0.36; 241Pu/239Pu atom ratio, ~0.0020) [1417].

In our previous study [9], we determined the characterization of Pu isotopes in the sediments collected in seven Japanese estuaries facing the Pacific before the accident. Here, we summarized 239+240Pu activity and 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the surface sediments in the marine environment off Japan, as presented in Fig. 9.1. 239+240Pu activity was relatively low, especially for the Japanese river estuary sandy sediments, which ranged from 0 to 1 mBq g−1. The highest concentration (5.81 mBq g−1) of 239+240Pu activity was reported in the surface sediment of Sagami Nada [18]. This high concentration was suggested to be caused by additional inputs of Pu from land origins (by rivers and by winds, followed by bioturbation) and the enhanced particle scavenging of transported PPG-source Pu [18, 21].

Fig. 9.1
figure 1

239+240Pu activities and 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in Japanese near-coastal marine sediments (0–2 cm). (Data from the literature [9, 1820])

Studies on 241Pu in the marine sediments off Japan before the nuclear accident are limited. Yamamoto et al. [22] determined Pu isotopes in the sediments in the Japan Sea and found that 241Pu activity ranged from 4.5 to 7.5 mBq g−1, which was similar to the results observed by Zheng and Yamada [21] in a sediment core collected from Sagami Bay. The Japanese government investigated Pu isotopes in the surface sediments off Japan and reported 241Pu activities less than 3.3 mBq g−1 [23]. However, as a result of the influence of the PPG close-in fallout, high 241Pu activities (up to 19–33 mBq g−1) were observed in the sediment near Bikini Atoll [24].

240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the Japanese near-coastal surface sediments ranged from 0.17 to 0.27 (Fig. 9.1). Almost all the values were generally higher than the value of global fallout (0.18), except in the marine sediments in Northern Japan, where global fallout was the dominant source. Comparison of 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the marine sediments in Japanese river estuaries with global fallout and PPG close-in fallout values is shown in Fig. 9.2. For the eastern estuaries facing the North Pacific, the average 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio was 0.231. The high 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios clearly indicated the mixing of global fallout Pu and PPG close-in fallout Pu in the marine environment before the FDNPP accident. For the vertical distribution of 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in sediment cores, high 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios, up to 0.30–0.33, have been found in the deeper layer (>5 cm) sediments from Okinawa Trough and Sagami Bay [2527]. The high 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio in the deeper layer sediment could be caused by earlier deposition of PPG close-in fallout Pu isotopes.

Fig. 9.2
figure 2

The 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio distribution in surface sediments of Japanese river estuaries [9]

From the reported results about the vertical distribution of Pu activities and atom ratios in the marine sediments in the Western North Pacific off Japan before the accident, we conclude that 239+240Pu activity and 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio in the upper layer (<5 cm) sediments ranged from 0.02 to 5.38 mBq g−1 and 0.15 to 0.28, respectively. For the deeper layer (>5 cm), the 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio could reach 0.30–0.33 because of the influence of earlier deposition of PPG close-in fallout Pu. Inventories of Pu in the sediments varied significantly because the bottom topography and sediment dynamics in different sea areas are different. These results can be regarded as background data for Pu distribution in the marine sediments before the FDNPP accident.

3 Distribution of Pu Isotopes in the Marine Sediments off Japan After the Accident

To assess the impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on possible Pu contamination in the marine environment, sediment core samples were collected in the Western North Pacific 30 km off the FDNPP during several cruises from July 2011 to July 2012 after the nuclear accident. The sampling information for each location is shown in Table 9.1. Pu distribution in surface sediments and sediment cores has been investigated [8, 9]. Results for 239+240Pu activity in the surface sediments, inventory-weighted 240Pu/230Pu atom ratios, and 239+240Pu inventories for each sample station are presented in Fig. 9.3.

Table 9.1 Sampling information about the sediment cores collected in the western North Pacific off the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) site after the nuclear accident
Fig. 9.3
figure 3

Plutonium (Pu) distribution in the marine sediments 30 km off the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) site after the nuclear accident. (Data from references [8, 9])

3.1 Distribution of Pu Activities and Pu Inventories

Zheng et al. [8] reported Pu isotopic concentration in the surface sediments; the surface 239+240Pu activities ranged from 0.48 to 3.53 mBq g−1. Bu et al. [9] investigated the vertical distribution of Pu isotopes in sediment cores. 239+240Pu activities for all the surface sediments collected after the nuclear accident were less than 4 mBq g−1, typically less than the background upper limit data (5.81 mBq g−1) before the accident. Activity of 241Pu in the investigated sediments was found to be quite low, most values being below the detection limit of 2 mBq g−1.

The inventories of Pu in the sediment cores ranged from 29 to 141 Bq m2. High Pu inventories have been commonly reported in the coastal sediments in the Western North Pacific and its marginal seas. For example, Pu inventories in the Southern Okinawa Trough were extremely high (201–693 Bq m2) [25]. For the Japan Sea and Okhotsk Sea, Pu inventories ranged from 5.7 to 241 Bq m2 and from 81 to 271 Bq m2, respectively [27]. Therefore, isotopic composition information should be combined with the inventory to reach a more reliable conclusion.

3.2 Pu Atom Ratios

The 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the surface sediments were between 0.188–0.255, and for all the sediment cores collected after the accident, 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios ranged from 0.188 to 0.293 [8, 9], typically higher than the global fallout value (0.18). 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the upper layers of the sediment cores showed nearly uniform distribution patterns, whereas for the sediment cores of MC1, FS1, and F1, the ratios increased from a definite depth. The higher 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios (>0.25) could be attributed to the presence of the PPG close-in fallout Pu.

As shown in Fig. 9.3, the inventory-weighted 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios for the sediment cores ranged from 0.189 to 0.243. The 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios for ES4 and ES5, which are located northeast of the FDNPP site, were lower than the values for the other stations. As the ES4 and ES5 stations are in the pathway of the Oyashio Current, they received more global fallout Pu than did the other stations investigated. The inventory-weighted 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio values were significantly lower than the reported values (>0.30) for the FDNPP accident-released Pu [6] but typically in the background range before the nuclear accident.

The 241Pu/239Pu atom ratio observed in the surface sediments ranged from 0.0012 to 0.0016, almost two orders of magnitude lower than the values (>0.1) derived from the FDNPP accident [6]. As mentioned in Sect. 9.2, global fallout of Pu is characterized by a 241Pu/239Pu atom ratio of 0.0011 and PPG close-in fallout has a 241Pu/239Pu atom ratio ~0.0020 [13, 16, 17]. The 241Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the Fukushima surface sediments were between the global fallout value and the PPG close-in fallout value. These results suggested that 241Pu in the Fukushima surface sediment originated from global fallout and PPG close-in fallout.

4 Sources of Pu Isotopes in Marine Sediments in the Western North Pacific off Japan

4.1 Influence of the FDNPP Accident on Pu Distribution

FDNPP-derived Pu has been characterized by high atom ratios of 240Pu/239Pu (0.303–0.330) and 241Pu/239Pu (0.103–0.135) [6]. Although the 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the sediments after the FDNPP accident were higher than the global fallout value, these values cannot be simply explained as the influence of the FDNPP accident because higher 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios were observed in a wide range of sea areas in the Western North Pacific before the accident as the result of the influence of PPG close-in fallout. Comparison of 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio and 239+240Pu activity for the marine sediments in the Western North Pacific before and after the accident is shown in Fig. 9.4. All the data observed after the FDNPP accident were in the background range before the accident. In the deeper layer sediments, higher 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios (>0.25) were observed, which could be explained as the earlier deposition of PPG close-in fallout Pu, considering the sediment depth. Therefore, it can be concluded that no extra Pu injection from the FDNPP accident has been detected in the marine sediments in the Western North Pacific 30 km off the FDNPP site after the nuclear accident.

Fig. 9.4
figure 4

Comparison of 239+240Pu activities (mBq g−1) and 240Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the marine sediments off Japan before and after the FDNPP accident. (Data for Pu isotopes in the marine sediments after the FDNPP accident cited from references [8, 9])

The data on the distribution of 241Pu provide further support to this conclusion. The 241Pu/239Pu atom ratios in the Fukushima surface sediments were two orders of magnitudes lower than the values derived from the FDNPP accident. The 241Pu/239Pu atom ratios were between the global fallout value and the PPG close-in fallout value, thus further implicating global fallout and PPG close-in fallout source contributions to the investigated regions.

4.2 Resolving Global Fallout and PPG Close-In Fallout Pu

Because two sources (global fallout and PPG close-in fallout) of Pu contamination in the marine sediments off Fukushima are identified, a simple two-end-member mixing model was used to calculate the relative contributions:

$$ Y=\frac{(Pu)_{\mathrm{P}}}{(Pu)_{\mathrm{G}}}=\frac{\left({R}_{\mathrm{G}}\hbox{--} {R}_{\mathrm{S}}\right)\left(1+3.66{R}_{\mathrm{P}}\right)}{\left({R}_{\mathrm{S}}\hbox{--} {R}_{\mathrm{B}}\right)\left(1+3.66{R}_{\mathrm{G}}\right)}, $$
(9.1)

where (Pu) is the 239+240Pu activity, R represents the 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio, and the subscripts P, G, and S refer to PPG close-in fallout, global fallout, and measured sediment samples, respectively. The inventory-weighted percentages of the PPG close-in fallout in each sediment core can be calculated by Eq. (9.1).

The results showed that Pu in the sediment cores from the PPG contributed 16–43 % to the total Pu contamination [9]. The contribution of PPG close-in fallout Pu at ES4 station is 16 %, lower than the values (38–43 %) for the other stations. As discussed before, ES4 is located at the pathway of the Oyashio Current, which brought a large amount of global fallout Pu to that region. The contribution of PPG close-in fallout Pu in other stations is almost the same as the reported value (41 %) in CM-03 at the same sea area before the accident [27], suggesting there was no significant variability for the distribution of Pu isotopes in the marine sediments off the FDNPP site before and after the nuclear accident.

5 Perspectives for Future Study

We compared the distribution of Pu isotopes in the marine sediments before and after the FDNPP accident. From this comparison, we could not identify any additional Pu injection from the FDNPP accident into the marine environment outside the 30-km zone after the accident. The Pu isotopes originated from global fallout and PPG close-in fallout. Recently, Perianez et al. [28] simulated the migration of the possible released Pu from the FDNPP accident in the Pacific Ocean, and they concluded that because of the low mobility of Pu in marine environment, if any Pu contamination from the FDNPP accident occurred in the sea, it would remain in an area very close to the FDNPP site. Therefore, the distribution of Pu isotopes in the marine sediments off the Fukushima Prefecture coast needs continuous investigation to reach a more comprehensive conclusion. We suggest that the following topics should be considered in future studies:

  1. 1.

    Expansion of the investigating intensity and area for the Pu distribution in the marine sediments off the Fukushima coast, especially for the marine sediments within the 30-km zone.

  2. 2.

    Fractionation of Pu in marine sediments to understand the mobility and bioavailability of Pu.

  3. 3.

    Investigation of Pu distribution and isotopic composition in seawater after the accident.

  4. 4.

    Study of Pu concentrations in marine biota to estimate the long-term dose influence of the FDNPP accident and to strengthen public confidence in the safety of seafood.