Abstract
There is an urgent need to establish integrated policies against natural disasters on a worldwide basis; however, there are various reasons, which prevent the society from taking decisive action. This chapter introduces the trend of recent natural disasters, and discusses a basic disaster risk management and governance framework from the perspective of human security engineering. It addresses the constituent elements of disaster risk, how human behaviors are related with natural disaster risks, and what types of policy measures are available for disaster risk management. In addition, it introduces the CAUSE model as a framework of disaster risk governance. In reality, there are frequent situations where it is unclear who manages disaster risk, to whom the disaster risk relates to, and what are the disaster risk problems faced by the stakeholders. Various roles of communication, which are placed in the central position of CAUSE model, are clarified and an explanation is provided on how this leads to a proper establishment of disaster risk governance among stakeholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This mainly represents direct damage. The case study in southeast India illustrates that realizing a recovery to baseline living depends on having a post-disaster financial recovery fund. Hence, indirect damage can be reduced via risk transfer that (partially) covers a fund for recovery.
- 2.
To avoid such situations, it is necessary to severely penalize persons or companies that conduct misleading structural calculations and to strengthening the inspectorate of structural calculations. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan developed the relevant legislation after the 2005 architectural forgery in Japan. http://www.mlit.go.jp/kozogiso/index.html, (in Japanese). Accessed 24 September 2013.
References
Adikari Y, Osti R, Noro T (2010) Flood-related disaster vulnerability: an impending crisis of megacities in Asia. J Flood Risk Manag 3(3):185–191
Apte P (2011) http://www.citymayors.com/development/dharavi.html. Accessed 24 September 2013
Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (2012) http://www.adpc.net/audmp/ audmp.html. Accessed 24 September 2013
Chafe Z (2007) Reducing natural risk disasters in cities. In: 2007 State of the world: our urban future. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C.
Choi J, Tatano H (2012) A study of workshops that develop viable solutions for flood risk reduction through the sharing of concerns: a case study of the Muraida community. Disaster Prevention Research Institute Annuals B, Maibara City, pp 67–74
Chitale Committee (2006) “Final Report” of the fact finding committee on mumbai floods. Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai
Gupta K (2007) Urban flood resilience planning and management and lessons for the future: a case study of Mumbai. Urban Water J 4(3):183–194
Hayashi M (2012) Shizen saigai ni yoru higai to keizai/Shakai-teki yoin to no kanrensei: Todofuken betsu paneru deta wo mochiita jissho bunseki (The Relationship between Damage from Natural Disasters and Economic and Social Factors: Positive Analysis Using Prefecture Level Panel Data). APIR Discussion Paper Series 28
ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management - Principles and guidelines
Munich Re (2012a) Great natural catastrophe worldwide 1950–2011, NatCatSERVICE
Munich Re (2012b) Natural catastrophes worldwide 1980–2011, NatCatSERVICE
Munich Re (2013) Significant natural catastrophe 1980–2012, NatCatSERVICE
Okada N (2004) Urban diagnosis and integrated disaster risk management. J Nat Disast Sci 26(2):49–54
Rahmato D (1988) Peasant survival strategies. Institute of Development Research, Addis Ababa University/International Institute for Relief and Development, Geneva
Rowan KE (1995) What risk communicators need to know: an agenda for research. In: Burelson BR (ed) Communication yearbook/18. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 300–319
Tatano H, Honma T, Okada N et al (2004) Economic restoration after a catastrophic event: heterogeneous damage to infrastructure and capital and its effects on economic growth. J Nat Disast Sci 26(2):81–85
UN-Habitat (2003) The challenges of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Earthscan Publications, London
UN-Habitat (2010) State of the world’s cities 2010/2011–cities for all: bridging the urban divide. Earthscan, London and Sterling, VA
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division (2012) World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision
Winchester P (1986) Cyclone vulnerability and housing policy in the Krishna delta, South India, 1977–1983. Ph.D. Thesis. School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Winchester P (1992) Power, choice and vulnerability: a case study in disaster mismanagement in South India. James & James Science Publishers, London
Wisner B, Blikie P, Cannon T et al (2003) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London
World Bank (2012) http://www.worldbank.org/pos/specialevent.html. Accessed 24 September 2013
Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv Emot 18(2):129–165
Yamaguchi M (1998) Gendai no risuku to hoken. Iwanami Shoten Publishers, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tatano, H., Yoshida, M. (2014). Integrated Disaster Risk Management from the Perspective of Human Security Engineering. In: Matsuoka, Y., Yoshida, M. (eds) Challenges for Human Security Engineering. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54288-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54288-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54287-2
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54288-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)