Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trust in Social Capital: A Matter of Discipline

  • Conference paper
Macht des Vertrauens

  • 6770 Accesses

Abstract

The impact of cultural factors on social capital, including norms of trustworthiness and beliefs like trust, has inCR1easingly been brought to the fore in social capital literature. Building on an early model of norm internalisation by Coleman (1987), this chapter intends to propose a fresh look at the trust/trustworthiness dimension of social capital under the paradigm of methodological individualism. Given that static preferences and conventional assumptions about rationality cannot account for the trustworthy behaviour of human individuals, it is argued that social capital research should adopt a psychologically-grounded perspective without which a theory of social capital would remain incomplete. In the light of these considerations, effective individualism – a modern form of discipline that fosters individual responsibility – is identified as an important source of trustworthiness. An interesting side effect of this hypothesis is that it allows for a conceptualisation of social capital perfectly in line with the general logic of capitalism, since competitive and cooperative types of behaviour can both be traced back to the very same cultural/ psychological preconditions.

This chapter builds in part on a working paper entitled “Trust Is Good, Self-control Is Better: Towards a Psychologically Grounded Theory of Social Capital” presented at the AHE, IIPPE, FAPE joint conference on Polical Economy and the Outlook for Capitalism, July 5-7, 2012, Paris, France.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn TK, Ostrom E. 2010. Social Capital and Collective Action. In: Castiglione D, van Deth J, Wolleb G (eds). The Handbook of Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 70–100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akerlof G, Kranton R. 2000. Economics and identity. Q. j. of econ. 115(3): 715–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akerlof G, Kranton R. 2002. Identity and schooling: some lessons for the economics of education. J. of Econ. Lit.; 40 (Dec.): 1167–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Almond G, Verba S. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and DemoCR7acy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K. 1995. Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Econ. Behav.; 10: 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brekke K, Kverndokk S, Nyborg K. 2003. An economic model of moral motivation. J. of Publ. Econ.; 87(9–10): 1967–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman J. 1987. Norms as Social Capital. In: Radnitzky G, Benholz P (eds). Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics. New York: Paragon House Publishers; 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis JB. 2006. The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism? J. of Inst. Econ.; 2(1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis JB. 2007. Akerlof and Kranton on identity in economics: inverting the analysis. Cambridge J. of Econ.; 31: 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deutsch M. 1962. Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In: Jones M. (eds). Nebraska Symposiums on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farr J. 2004. Social Capital: A Conceptual History. Polit. Theory; 32(1): 6–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Festinger L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fukuyama F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the CR19eation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geramanis O. 2002. Vertrauen. Die Entdeckung einer sozialen Ressource. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. 2010. Civic Capital as the Missing Link. In: Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson MO (eds). Handbook of Social Economics, Volume 1A. Amsterdam, North-Holland; 417–480.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greif A. 1994. Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. J. of Polit. Econ.; 102: 912–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herreros F. 2004. The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hofstede GH. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations aCR26oss Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstede GH. 2010. Individualism. http://www.geert-hofstede.com (2010). (Accessed: 21st of August 2010).

  21. Knack S, Keefer P. 1997. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A CR30oss- Country Investigation. Q. J. of Econ.; 112(4): 1252–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klasing M. 2008. The Cultural Roots of Institutions. Discussion Paper 2008-24. Department of Economics, University of St.Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak P, Fischbache U, Fehr E. 2005. Oxytocin InCR34eases Trust in Humans. Nature; 435(2): 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krampen G, Hank P. 2004. Die Vertrauens-Trias: interpersonales Vertrauen, Selbstvertrauen und Zukunftsvertrauen in der psychologischen Theoriebildung und Forschung. Rep. Psychologie; 11: 666–677.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Licht A, Goldschmidt, C, Schwartz S. 2007. Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. J. of Comp. Econ.; 35: 659–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luhmann N. 1968. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Markus H, Kitayama S. 1991. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev.; 98: 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McKnight D, Choudhury V, Kacmar C. 2002. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. Inf. Syst. Res.; 13(3): 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKnight D, Chervany N. The Meanings of Trust. Scientific report, University of Minnesota. http://www.misrc.umn.edu/wpaper/wp96-04.htm(1996).(Accessed: 16th of July, 2012).

  30. Petersen MB, Roepstoff A, Serritzlew S. 2009. Social Capital in the Brain? In: Svendsen GT, Svendsen G, Haase L (eds). Handbook of Social Capital. The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Putnam R. 1993. Making DemoCR44acy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. With the collaboration of R. Leonardi and R. Nanetti. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson L, Schmid A, Siles M. 2002. Is Social Capital Really Capital? Rev. of Soc. Econ.; 60(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roth K. 2003. Genealogie des Staates. Prämissen des neuzeitlichen Politikdenkens. Berlin, Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rossteutscher S. 2010. Social Capital and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Perspective. In: Castiglione D, van Deth J, Wolleb G (eds). The Handbook of Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 208–240.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Solow R. 2000. Notes on Social Capital and Economic Performance. In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds). Social Capital. A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tabellini G. 2010. Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe. J. of the Eur. Econ. Ass.; 8(4): 677–716.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Uslaner E. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Uslaner E. 2008: The foundations of trust: maCR54o and miCR55o. Camb. J. of Econ.; 32: 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Deth J. 2010. Measuring Social Capital. In: Castiglione D, van Deth J, Wolleb G (eds). The Handbook of Social Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 150–176.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weber R. 2009. Religio-philosophical Roots. In: Svendsen GT, Svendsen G, Haase L (eds). Handbook of Social Capital. The troika of sociology, political science and economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Matthias Meyer-Schwarzenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Schweiz

    Jens Vollmar , Roman Becker  & Isabella Hoffend ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meyer-Schwarzenberger, M. (2013). Trust in Social Capital: A Matter of Discipline. In: Vollmar, J., Becker, R., Hoffend, I. (eds) Macht des Vertrauens. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4453-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4453-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-4452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-4453-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation