Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben

Part of the book series: Studium Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit ((SPTG))

  • 7489 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Inhaltliche Überlegungen, Methoden der Erhebung und die psychometrischen Eigenschaften sind wichtige Entscheidungsparameter für die Wahl eines Assessments. Das Kapitel vermittelt Grundlagen für die kritische Bewertung von Assessments und erleichtert damit den Entscheidungsprozess in der Praxis und in der Forschung. Quellen für die Suche nach Assessments und eine Checkliste am Ende des Kapitels erleichtern das Auffinden und Bewerten. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Darstellung der Reliabilität, Validität und Praktikabilität. Zusätzlich werden die kulturelle Validität und die Responsivität von Assessments beschrieben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N (2008) Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value in Health 11(3):509–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atler K, Malcolm M, Greife C (2015) A follow-up study on the relationship among participation, activity and motor function in survivors of stroke following constraint-induced therapy. Disabil Rehabil 37(2):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidlines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (24):3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J, Döring N (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkin LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DIMDI (Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information) (2005) ICF – Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. www.dimdi.de

  • Fawcett AL (2007) Principles of assessment for occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjersing L, Caplehorn JRM, Clausen T (2010) Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology 10(13):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool J, Hilfiker R, Oesch P, Verra M, Wirz M (2014) Bewertung von Assessments. In: Wirz M, Köhler B, Marks D, Kool J, Sattelmayer M, Oesch P, Hilfiker R, Schädler S, Verra M, Lüthi H (Hrsg) Lehrbuch Assessments in der Rehabilitation. Huber, Bern, S 87–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraxner M (2011) Assessment: Nine-Hole-Peg-Test. Ergopraxis 4(9):30–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraxner M (2014) Box and Block test. Ergopraxis 7(4):36–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics 33:159–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Nancy P (2015) COPM – Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 5. Aufl. Schulz-Kirchner, Idstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Law MC, Baum CM, Dunn W (eds) (2005) Measuring occupational performance: supporting best practice in occupational therapy, 2. Aufl. Slack, Thorofare

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDermid JC, Law M, Michlovitz S (2014) Outcome measurement in evidence-based rehabilitation. In: Law M, MacDermid JC (eds) Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. Slack, Thorofare, S 65–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985a) Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39(6):386–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (1985b) Adult Norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. OTJR: Occupation. Participation and Health 5(1):24–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2010a) The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 63(7):737–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2010b) The COSMIN checkslist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M (2011) Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehabmeasures (2010) Rehabilitation measures database: statistics. www.rehabmeasures.org

  • Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL (2007) Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemological measurement instruments. Rev Saúde Pública 41(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherfer E, Bohls C, Freiberger E, Heise K-F, Hogan D (2006) Berg-Balance-Scale – deutsche Version; Übersetzung eines standardisierten Assessment-Instruments zur Beurteilung von Gleichgewicht und Sturzgefährdung. Physioscience 2(2):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, Thorsen H, McKenna SP (2004) Adapting quality of life instruments. Value in Health 7(1):S27–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21(4):651–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1997) WHOQL: measuring quality of life. WHO, Genf. www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf

  • WHO (2015) Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. WHO, Genf. www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FH Campus Wien, Wien, Österreich

    Erna Schönthaler

Authors
  1. Erna Schönthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erna Schönthaler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leopoldsdorf im Marchfelde, Österreich

    Valentin Ritschl

  2. Wien, Österreich

    Roman Weigl

  3. Wien, Österreich

    Tanja Stamm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schönthaler, E. (2023). Assessments. In: Ritschl, V., Weigl, R., Stamm, T. (eds) Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben. Studium Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66501-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66501-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66500-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66501-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation