Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soziales Unternehmertum – eine neue Form des sozial nachhaltigen Wirtschaftens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fehlzeiten-Report 2022

Part of the book series: Fehlzeiten-Report ((FEHLREPORT,volume 2022))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Die Korrelation „r“ drückt aus, wie stark zwei Variablen miteinander in Verbindung stehen. Dabei gelten Korrelationen um 0,10 als klein, um 0,30 als mittel und über 0,50 als groß (Cohen 1988). Korrelationen geben jedoch keine Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehung (Kausalität) an.

Literatur

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman TS, Crant JM (1993) The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates. J Organ Behav 14(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad Manag Ann 8:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein D (1997) The price of a dream: the story of the Grameen Bank. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma N, Schøtt T, Terjesen S, Kew P (2016) GEM 2015 report on social entrepreneurship

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon R (1756) Essai sur la nature du commerce. Fletcher Gyles, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon MS, Patel PC (2015) Is stress worth it? Stress-related health and wealth trade-offs for entrepreneurs. Appl Psychol 64(2):379–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipeta EM, Koloba HA, Surujlal J (2016) Influence of gender and age on social entrepreneurship intentions among university students in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Gend Behav 14(1):6885–6899

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipeta EM, Kruse P, Surujlal J (2020) Effects of gender on antecedents to social entrepreneurship among university students in South Africa. Int J Bus Manag Stud 12(1):18–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipeta EM, Kruse P, Venter R A risky way of doing good–combining personality and cognitive variables in a new hierarchical model of investment risk-taking in social entrepreneurship. J Afr Bus (im Druck a) https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2021.1907157

  • Chipeta EM, Venter R, Kruse P Measuring the role of reductive bias in social enterprise formation: development and validation of a social entrepreneurial intention bias scale. J Soc Entrepreneursh. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1758196 (im Druck b)

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorado S, Chen Y, Prado AM, Simon V (2022) Attuned HRM systems for social enterprises. J Bus Ethics 178, 829–848 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04821-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin S, Mickiewicz T, Stephan U (2013) Entrepreneurship, social capital. and institutions: social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 37(3):479–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Maritz A, Lobo A (2013) Obsession in entrepreneurs – towards a conceputalisation. Entrepreneursh Res J 3(2):207–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz M, Kay T, Spicer J (2018) Social enterprise is not social change. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 16(2):59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes MG, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: the sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad Manag Rev 44(4):819–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann P, Scharpe K, Wunsch M (2021) 3. Deutscher Social Entrepreneurship Monitor 2020/21. SEND

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein S, Schneider S, Spieth P (2021) How to stay on the road? A business model perspective on mission drift in social purpose organizations. J Bus Res 125:658–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann T, Hensellek S, Jung PB, Kleine-Stegemann L, Ataee J, de Cruppe K (2020) Deutscher Startup Monitor 2020. Bundesverband Deutsche Startups

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger NF, Brazeal DV (1994) Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 18:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse P (2020a) Can there only be one? – an empirical comparison of four models on social entrepreneurial intention formation. Int Entrepreneursh Manag J 16(2):641–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse P (2020b) Spreading entrepreneurial news – investigating media influence on social entrepreneurial antecedents. Green Finance 2(3):284–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse P (2021) Exploring international and inter-sector differences of social enterprises in the UK and India. Sustainability 13(11):5870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse P, Wach D, Costa S, Moriano JA (2019) Values matter, don’t they? – Combining theory of planned behavior and personal values as predictors of social entrepreneurial intention. J Soc Entrepreneursh 10(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse P, Wach D, Wegge J (2021) What motivates social entrepreneurs? A meta-analysis on predictors of the intention to found a social enterprise. J Small Bus Manag 59(3):477–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laviolette EM, Lefebvre MR, Brunel O (2012) The impact of story bound entrepreneurial role models on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 18(6):720–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes M, Stephan U (2012) Nonprofit leaders and for-profit entrepreneurs: similar people with different motivation. Cesk Psychol 56(1):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PJ, Liao J, Welsch HP (2006) A conceptual history of entrepreneurial thought. J Manag Hist 12(1):12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag CM, Versloot PH (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Bus Econ 29(4):351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag M, van Praag CM, Versloot PH (2007) The economic benefits and costs of entrepreneurship: a review of the research. Found Trends Entrepreneursh 4(2):65–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahdari A, Sepasi S, Moradi M (2016) Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: the role of social enterprises. J Clean Prod 137:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassmannshausen SP, Volkmann C (2018) The scientometrics of social entrepreneurship and its establishment as an academic field. J Small Bus Manag 56(2):251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerle T, Schmitz B, Spiess-Knafl W, Schües R, Richter S (2015) Mapping social entrepreneurship in Germany – a quantitative analysis. Int J Soc Entrepreneursh Innov 3(6):484–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna M (Hrsg) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press, London, S 1–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan U (2018) Entrepreneurs’ mental health and well-being: a review and research agenda. Acad Manag Perspect 32(3):290–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan U, Roesler U (2010) Comparison of entrepreneurs’ and employee’s health in a national representative sample. J Occup Organ Psychol 83(3):717–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan U, Uhlaner LM, Stride C (2015) Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. J Int Bus Stud 46(3):308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan W-L, Williams J, Tan T-M (2005) Defining the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’: altruism and entrepreneurship. Int Entrepreneursh Manag J 1(3):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandor P, Meyer M (2021) Social entrepreneurs: driven by mission, but doomed to burn out? Proceedings. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Post JE (1991) Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Admin Rev 51(5):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young DR (1983) If not for profit, for what? Lexington Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SX, Cueto J (2017) The study of bias in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 41(3):419–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät Psychologie, Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069, Dresden, Deutschland

    Dr. Philipp Kruse

Authors
  1. Dr. Philipp Kruse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Kruse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland

    Bernhard Badura

  2. FB I Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT), Berlin, Deutschland

    Antje Ducki

  3. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK, Berlin, Deutschland

    Markus Meyer

  4. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Deutschland

    Helmut Schröder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kruse, P. (2022). Soziales Unternehmertum – eine neue Form des sozial nachhaltigen Wirtschaftens. In: Badura, B., Ducki, A., Meyer, M., Schröder, H. (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2022. Fehlzeiten-Report, vol 2022. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65598-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65598-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65597-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65598-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation