Skip to main content

Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Manual of Spine Surgery
  • 270 Accesses

Abstract

Bone grafts or substitutes are used in spinal surgery to fill defects, to bridge defects or to promote spondylodesis. The physiological process is similar to that of fracture healing and incorporates the same spatial and temporal factors. The ideal material should provide osteogenetic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. The traditional autologous bone grafts are probably still considered the “golden standard”, but the problems associated with them bring up the need for substitutes. One alternative is the acquirance of allogeneic or xenogeneic bone grafts, which have specific problems of their own, which limit their use. The other aspect is the use of bone substitutes, which come in a growing variety of materials, shapes and application forms. Currently, none of these substitutes unite all of the prerequisites shown above, but they have the advantage of unlimited supply without causing additional problems such as donor site morbidity. And the combination of such substitutes as scaffold with the utilization of growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells brings with them a completely new array of possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sen MK, Miclau T. Autologous iliac crest bone graft: should it still be the gold standard for treating nonunions? Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 1):S75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bone Graft Alternatives (according to the North American Spine Society). http://www.spine.org/Documents/bone_grafts_2006.pdf

  3. Phillips AM. Overview of the fracture healing cascade. Injury. 2005;36(Suppl 3):S5–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papakostidis C, Kontakis D, Bhandari M, et al. Efficacy of autologeous iliac crest bone graft and bone morphologic proteins for posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine – a metaanalysis of the results. Spine. 2008;33(19):E680–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 4):S3–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrison RH, Thierolf A, Weckbach A. Volumetric changes of iliac crest autografts used to reconstruct the anterior column in thoracolumbar fractures: a follow-up using CT scans. Spine. 2007;32(26):3030–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berven S, Tay BK, Kleinstueck FS, et al. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: consideration of mineralized and demineralized preparations and growth factor supplementation. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(Suppl 2):S169–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schimandle JH, Boden SD. Bone substitutes for lumbar fusion: present and future. Oper Tech Orthop. 1997;7:60–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedlaender GE. Bone-banking. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:307–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen B, Whang PG, Iglesias R, et al. Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(10):2243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper GS, Kou TD. Risk of cancer following lumbar fusion surgery with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): an analysis using a commercially insured patient population. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(2):260–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwong FN, Harris MB. Recent developments in the biology of fracture repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(11):619–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker S, Maissen O, Ponomarev I, et al. Osteopromotion by a beta-tricalcium phosphate/bone marrow hybrid implant for use in spine surgery. Spine. 2006;31(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis CC, Tsirids E. Gene therapy in orthopaedics. Injury. 2006;37(Suppl 1):S30–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris MT, Tarpada SP, Cho W. Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:1856–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Morrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morrison, R. (2023). Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes. In: Vieweg, U., Grochulla, F. (eds) Manual of Spine Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64062-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64062-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64062-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics