Abstract
Chemical transport modeling, 3-D Eulerian grid modeling, started around 1975. Its development, based on work by the authors’ Ph.D.-students, is followed over the last 40 years. An attempt is made to analyse model improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banzhaf, S. (2014). Modeling the fate of secondary inorganic aerosol and its precursors over Europe. Ph.D.-study Free University Berlin, Germany.
Builtjes, P., et al. (1980). Application of a photochemical dispersion model to the Netherlands and its surroundings. 11th ITM, Amsterdam.
Denis, R., et al. (2010). A framework for evaluation of regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems. Environmental Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2
Dentener, F. (1993). Heterogeneous chemistry in the troposphere. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Duyzer, J. (1995). Dry deposition of nitrogen compounds to semi-natural ecosystems. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dylan, B. (1963). The times they are a-changin’.
Dylan, B. (2017). Triplicate: The best is yet to come.
Engelen, R. (1996). Satellite observations of ozone. Ph.D-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Erisman, J. W. (1992). Atmospheric deposition of acidifying compounds in the Netherlands. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eskes, H., et al. (2012). Data assimilation and air quality forecasting. 32th ITM, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Galmarini, S. (1997). Turbulent transport of nitrogen oxides in the atmospheric boundary layer. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Galmarini, S., et al. (2012). Ensemble and Amet: Two systems and approaches to a harmonized, simplified and efficient assistance to air quality model developments and evaluation. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.076
Junge, C. (1963). Air chemistry and radioactivity.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia.
Lelieveld, J. (1990). The role of clouds in tropospheric chemistry. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mues, A. (2013). Modeling air quality in a changing climate. Ph.D.-study Free University Berlin, Germany.
Olivier, J. (2002). On the quality of global emission inventories. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pasquill, F. (1962). Atmospheric Diffusion.
Raes, F. (2012). Air and climate. Conversations about molecules and planets, with humans in between. JRC7, 1278.
Rao, S. T., et al. (2012). AQMEII: A two-continent effort for the evaluation of regional air quality models. 32th ITM, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Reynolds, S., Roth, P., & Seinfeld, J. (1973). Mathematical modeling of photochemical air pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 7.
Roelofs, G. J. (1992). Aerosol and drop size dependent cloud chemistry. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Schaap, M. (2003). On the importance of aerosol nitrate in Europe. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Slade, D. (1968). Meteorology and Atomic Energy, USAEC, Hep. NO TID-24190.
Solazzo, E., et al. (2012). Model evaluation and ensemble modeling for surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.003
Steyn, D. (2017). The intellectual history of air pollution modeling as represented by the ITM meeting Series. 35th ITM, Crete.
Szinyei, D. (2014). Modeling and evaluation of ozone dry deposition. Ph.D.-study Free University Berlin.
Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference.
Tuinder, O. (2002). Global distribution of OH Radical production in the troposphere based on satellite data. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
vanValk, P. (1992). A model for cloud-chemistry: Simulations and observations. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Veefkind, P. (1999). Aerosol satellite remote sensing. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vila, J. (1992). The influence of turbulence on chemical reactions in the atmospheric boundary layer. Ph.D.-study University Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Questions and Answers
Questions and Answers
Questioner Name: Silvia Trini Castelli
Q: A colleague of us stated 20 years ago that models are affected by an intrinsic uncertainty, or error, around 30%. Do you think that we have a chance to go over it? Do you agree?
A: I agree that models will always have an inherent uncertainty, and that 30% is in fact not so bad. And as I stated, there is a limit in further model improvement. We should also not forget that observations have an inherent uncertainty also, not forgetting to include their spatial representativeness.
Questioner Name: Heinke Schluenzen
Q: Do you think that the bias of O3 is also the same as 40 year ago? And as a remark: We might have to consider non-Gaussian error measures for very high resolution model result evaluation.
A: I did not look in other statistical measures, which I should have done. I think that the bias might has improved, but I don’t have looked into these data. Using other statistical measures is a very good idea.
Questioner name: Bertrand Carissimo
Q: I was interested in your point that model improvement does not show in the statistical comparison with observations because I encounter this problem in my work on small scale modeling. So my suggestion is do we need also to improve the statistics? This is a serious remark as for example, with current statistics, a refined model that reproduces a realistic small feature at slightly the wrong place and wrong time will do worse than a larger scale model that does not reproduce the feature.
A: My first answer is that the focus should be on model improvement, not on improvement in statistics because that does not change the model results. I do agree that we should look into other statistical measures in addition to the conventional ones. See also the remark by Heinke Schluenzen.
Questioner name: Steven Hanna
Q: You say that the correlations between model predictions and observations of ozone have remained at about 0.7 for the past 40 years. But isn’t it easy for an ozone model to have a good correlation because observed concentrations are usually high in the day and low at night? Even a bad model should be able to reproduce that behaviour.
A: I agree, any simple, but still basically correct model is able to model ozone right. My point is that I think that, due to inherent uncertainties, it will be impossible to have a model for ozone with a correlation of 0.9.
Questioner Name: B. Armand
Q: You say that observations do not lead to knowledge. I am not sure that everyone would agree with you. What do you think of Big Data?
A: My opinion is that just observations without further data-analysis or modeling do not lead to knowledge, this just lead to data. In case Big Data are seen as just many data, which are subsequently used to create algorithms without further thinking, this should in my opinion be avoided. It might even be dangerous and lead to misleading algorithms and correlations that give the wrong information.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Builtjes, P. (2021). Improvements of Chemical Transport Modeling Over the Last 40 Years—A Personal Journey. In: Mensink, C., Matthias, V. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXVII. ITM 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63760-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63760-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63759-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63760-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)