Skip to main content

Rural Development Policies at Stake: Structural Changes and Target Evolutions During the Last 50 Years

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science
  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

Rural development policies have existed for decades, especially in OECD countries, and their impact has always been acknowledged by local actors. Our survey puts the emphasis on the diversity of policy instruments and public authorities, but also on the plurality of objectives, supporting and promoting economic activities (including agriculture), land planning, residential attractiveness and maintaining the quality of life of populations, conservation and preservation of local resources. We show that these policies have been subject to many shifts in vision and strategy – shifts which echo the changing perceptions of what rural development means and of what its objectives should be. Both the policies and the concept of rural development have evolved with economic circumstances, been discussed in the same debates, and have undergone the same reversals. They have changed in parallel with the recognition of the multifunctionality of agriculture, or with transitions from centralized decision-making to greater inclusion of the various users of rural areas and even greater consideration for social criteria and ecological and environmental variables. Following a long period in which rural development policies were essentially top-down decisions imposed by state and central governments, the policy-making process has since been decentralized (or “regionalized”) and localized and has in more recent years sought to include the views of the populations concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe H, Alden JD (1988) Regional development planning in Japan. Reg Stud 22(5):429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botterill L (2016) Agricultural policy in Australia: deregulation, bipartisanship and agrarian sentiment. Aust J Polit Sci 51(4):667–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke P (2006) Conceptualizing rurality. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (eds) The handbook of rural studies. Sage, London, p 510

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk I, Harrison L (1998) Community learning and social capital: “just having a little chat”. J Vocat Educ Train 50(4):609–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freshwater D (2007) Rural development and the declining coherence of rural policy: an American and Canadian perspective. Agricultural Economics Staff Paper # 467 June 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D, La Rosa D, Spyra M, Cortinovis C (2017) A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 165:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree K (2003) Landscapes of rurality: rural others/other rurals. In: Roberston I, Richard P (eds) Studying cultural landscapes. Arnold, London, pp 141–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Cheshire L (2000) Contemporary strategies for rural community development in Australia: a governmentality perspective. J Rural Stud 16:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00054-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honadle BW (2001) Rural development policy in the United States: beyond the cargo cult mentality. J Reg Anal Policy 31(2):93

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems at its 50th Session held on 2–7 August

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata H (2019) Strategy cascading for regional revitalization in Japan. Departmental Bulletin Paper. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1015/00013295/

  • Jordan A, Wurzel AKW, Zito A (2005) The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Pol Stud 53(3):477–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, et al (2015) Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques: France, Suisse et Canada. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec, p 423

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Liu Y, Li X, Chen Y (2010) Building new countryside in China: a geographical perspective. Land Use Policy 27:457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T (2006) Pathways in the sociology of rural knowledge. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (eds) The handbook of rural studies. Sage, London, p 510

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilès R (2013) Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Reg Stud 49:1291–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mormont M (1990) Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: towards a sociology of the rural. In: Marsden T, Whatmore S, Lowe P (eds) Rural restructuring. Fulton, London, pp 21–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) OECD rural policy reviews: the new rural paradigm: policies and governance. OECD, Paris, 130 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Rural 3.0. A framework for rural development. Policy Note, 27 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD, Olfert MR, Ali K (2009) Towards a rural development policy: lessons from the United States and Canada. J Reg Anal Policy 39(2):109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling N, de Jong F (1998) Learning: shifting paradigms in education and extension studies. J Agric Educ Ext 5(3):143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Rosa Pires A., M. Pertoldi, J. Edwards and F.B. Hegyi (2014) Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas, S3 Policy Brief Series No. 09/2014, JRC Technical Support, 21 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabourin E (2015) Politiques de développement rural territorial au Brésil: entre participation et clientélisme. Esprit Critique 21(01):129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonneau J-P, Sabourin E (eds) (2007) Agricultura familiar, Interação entre Políticas Públicas e Dinâmicas Locais. ed. da UFRGS, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre A, Wallet F (2016) Regional development in rural areas. Analytical tools and public policies, Springer briefs in regional science. Springer, Heidelberg, p 110

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre A, Wallet F, Corsi S, Steiner M, Westlund H (eds) (2020) Is there a smart development for rural areas? Routledge, London, (to be published)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018) World Bank Open Data, https://data.worldbank.org/, World Bank Group

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Torre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Torre, A., Wallet, F. (2021). Rural Development Policies at Stake: Structural Changes and Target Evolutions During the Last 50 Years. In: Fischer, M.M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_136

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics