Skip to main content

Proof-Theoretic Aspects of Hybrid Type-Logical Grammars

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Grammar (FG 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11668))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores proof-theoretic aspects of hybrid type-logical grammars, a logic combining Lambek grammars with lambda grammars. We prove some basic properties of the calculus, such as normalisation and the subformula property and also present a proof net calculus for hybrid type-logical grammars. In addition to clarifying the logical foundations of hybrid type-logical grammars, the current study opens the way to variants and extensions of the original system, including but not limited to a non-associative version and a multimodal version incorporating structural rules and unary modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The rule for the \(/\) directly parallels that for \(\backslash \), modulo directionality.

  2. 2.

    As is usual in the lambda calculus, we do not distinguish alpha-equivalent lambda terms.

  3. 3.

    For natural deduction, rule permutations are a problem only for the \(\bullet E\) and the \(\Diamond E\) rules.

  4. 4.

    To ensure confluence of ‘ / ’ and ‘\(\backslash \)’ in the presence of \(\epsilon \) we can add the side condition to the [ / I] and \([\backslash I]\) contractions that the component to which the par link is attached has at least one hypothesis other than the auxiliary conclusion of the par link. This forbids empty antecedent derivations and restores confluence.

References

  1. Danos, V.: La Logique Linéaire Appliquée à l’étude de Divers Processus de Normalisation (Principalement du \({\lambda }\)-Calcul). University of Paris VII (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Di Cosmo, R., Kesner, D.: Combining algebraic rewriting, extensional lambda calculi, and fixpoints. Theor. Comput. Sci. 169(2), 201–220 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 50(1), 1–102 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Klop, J., van Oostrom, V., van Raamsdonk, F.: Combinatory reduction systems: introduction and survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 121(1–2), 279–308 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubota, Y., Levine, R.: Coordination in hybrid type-logical grammar. In: Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kubota, Y., Levine, R.: Determiner gapping as higher-order discontinuous constituency. In: Morrill, G., Nederhof, M.-J. (eds.) FG 2012-2013. LNCS, vol. 8036, pp. 225–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39998-5_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kubota, Y., Levine, R.: Gapping as like-category coordination. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Moortgat, M.: Categorial type logics. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 93–177. Elsevier/MIT Press, Amsterdam/Cambridge (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Moortgat, M., Moot, R.: Proof nets for the Lambek-Grishin calculus. In: Grefenstette, E., Heunen, C., Sadrzadeh, M. (eds.) Quantum Physics and Linguistics: A Compositional, Diagrammatic Discourse, pp. 283–320. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moot, R.: Proof nets for linguistic analysis. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moot, R., Puite, Q.: Proof nets for the multimodal Lambek calculus. Stud. Logica 71(3), 415–442 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Worth, C.: The phenogrammar of coordination. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2014 Workshop on Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics (TTNLS), pp. 28–36 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshinaka, R., Kanazawa, M.: The complexity and generative capacity of lexicalized abstract categorial grammars. In: Blache, P., Stabler, E., Busquets, J., Moot, R. (eds.) LACL 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3492, pp. 330–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11422532_22

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Moot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moot, R., Stevens-Guille, S.J. (2019). Proof-Theoretic Aspects of Hybrid Type-Logical Grammars. In: Bernardi, R., Kobele, G., Pogodalla, S. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11668. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59648-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59648-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-59647-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-59648-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics