Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digitale Volumentomographie zur Diagnostik in der oralen Implantatologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitale Volumentomographie

  • 1228 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die DVT generiert dreidimensionale Daten in digitaler Form. Dies ermöglicht, die gewonnenen komplexen Informationen einerseits automatisiert auszuwerten und andererseits konsequent und vollständig digital weiter zu verwenden. Beide Aspekte werden im vorliegenden Kapitel behandelt. Die automatisierte Bilddatenauswertung steckt für die DVT noch in den Anfängen. Wir erwarten für die Zukunft einen schrittweisen Einzug in die Praxis. In medizinischen Bereichen ist dies schon erkennbar: Bei der „Kapselendoskopie“ mittels „Kamerapille“ werden mehrere Tausend Fotos aus dem Magen-Darm-Trakt erzeugt. Diese werden vor der Befundung automatisiert vorsortiert. Der volldigitale Workflow unter Einbezug der DVT hingegen ist z. B. in der Implantologie schon in der klinischen Anwendung etabliert. Ein vollständiger In-House-Workflow, wie im Bereich der Inlay- und Kronenherstellung oft schon etabliert, ist bei dieser Anwendung aber noch die Ausnahme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC (2002) A surgical guide for accurate mesiodisalt paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 87:233–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D (2009) Outcome evaluations of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 80(1):140–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bettschart C, Kruse A, Matthews F, Zemann W, Obwegeser JA, Gratz KW, Lubbers HT (2012) Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bidgood WD Jr, Horii SC (1992) Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics 12:345–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer M, Gander T, Kruse Gujer A, Seifert B, Rucker M, Lubbers HT (2015) Influence of mirrored computed tomograms on decision-making for revising surgically treated orbital floor fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:1982 e1981–1982 e1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC (2004) Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 19. Suppl:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cootes TF, Taylor CJ (2004) Statistical models of appearance for computer vision, Technical report, University of Manchester, Manchester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G (2005) Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clinical oral implants res 16(6):639–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander T, Essig H, Metzler P, Lindhorst D, Dubois L, Rucker M, Schumann P (2015) Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geusens J, Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Bila M, Darche V, Politis C (2019) Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-assisted mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap. J Craniofac Surg 30:2319–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goormans F, Sun Y, Bila M, Schoenaers J, Geusens J, Lubbers HT, Coucke W, Politis C (2019) Accuracy of computer-assisted mandibular reconstructions with free fibula flap: results of a single-center series. Oral Oncol 97:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A (2012) Working group 4. Consensus report – reconstructions on implants. The third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Impl Res 23(Suppl 6):238–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm T (2004) User’s guide to rapid prototyping. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Michigan, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M (2005) Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 25(2):113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): part 1. Description of system. The British journal of radiology 46:1016–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull CW (1986) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography, Google Patents, Pennsylvania, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen C, Kruse A, Lubbers HT, Zwahlen R, Studer S, Zemann W, Seifert B, Gratz KW (2014) Is mandibular reconstruction using vascularized fibula flaps and dental implants a reasonable treatment? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16:419–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R, Aass AM, Demirel K, Derks J et al (2015) Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol. 42(Suppl 16):S152–S157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF, Tahmaseb A (2009) Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 24:92–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernen M, Benic G, Payer M, Schär A, Müller-Gerbl M, Filippi A, Kühl S (2016) Accuracy of 3D printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT. Clin Impl Dent Rel Res 18:762–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA (2006) Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 130(2):141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 1:1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse AL, Luebbers HT, Gratz KW, Obwegeser JA (2010a) Factors influencing survival of free-flap in reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck: a literature review. Microsurgery 30:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse AL, Luebbers HT, Gratz KW, Obwegeser JA (2010b) Free flap monitoring protocol. J Craniofac Surg 21:1262–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linke P (2017) Grundlagen zur Automatisierung. Grundlagen Automatisierung. Springer, Berlin S 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lison I, Bredell MG, Luebbers HT, Gratz KW, Kruse AL (2010) Tibial stress fracture after fibular graft harvesting: an unusual complication. J Craniofac Surg 21:1082–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Messmer P, Gratz KW, Ellis RE, Matthews F (2010) Misjudgments at the mandibular angle: freehand versus computer-assisted screw positioning. J Craniofac Surg 21:1012–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Jacobsen C, Matthews F, Gratz KW, Kruse A, Obwegeser JA (2011a) Surgical navigation in craniomaxillofacial surgery: expensive toy or useful tool? A classification of different indications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:300–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Kruse A, Messmer P, Gratz KW, Obwegeser JA, Matthews F (2011b) Precise screw positioning at the mandibular angle: computer assisted versus template coded. J Craniofac Surg 22:620–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Matthews F, Zemann W, Gratz KW, Obwegeser JA, Bredell M (2011c) Registration for computer-navigated surgery in edentulous patients: a problem-based decision concept. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39:453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Obwegeser JA, Matthews F, Eyrich G, Gratz KW, Kruse A (2011d) A simple and flexible concept for computer-navigated surgery of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:924–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Terzic A, Zemann W, Jacobsen C, Obwegeser J, Kruse A (2011e) Computer assisted maxillofacial surgery. Minerva Chir 66:469–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers HT, Matthews F, Kruse AL (2014) Modern technologies in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Praxis (Bern 1994) 103:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Luebbers H-T (2013) The mirroring technique: a navigation-based method for reconstructing a symmetrical orbit and cranial vault comment. Neurosurgery 73:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Luebbers HT, Messmer P, Obwegeser JA, Zwahlen RA, Kikinis R, Graetz KW, Matthews F (2008) Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 36:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luebbers HT, Zemann W, Kruse AL, Graetz KW (2013) A simple technique for sterility and patient accessibility during intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:e312–e313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler P, Zemann W, Lübbers H-T, Guggenberger R, Lüssi A, Obwegeser JA, Grätz KW, Jacobsen C (2012) Bone mineral density measurements performed by cone-beam computed tomography in the bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis-affected jaw. Oral Radiology 28:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli GD (1994) Synthesis and optimization of digital circuits. McGraw-Hill Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostetter C, Metzler P, Schenkel JS, Seifert B, Luebbers HT (2015) Comparison of in vivo cone-beam and multidetector computed tomographic scans by three-dimensional merging software. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D (2012) Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Impl Res 23(Suppl):163–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sailer I, Fehmer V, Ioannidis A, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS (2014) Threshold value for the perception of color changes of human gingiva. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 34(6):757–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider D, Schober F, Grohmann P, Hammerle CH, Jung RE (2015) In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(3):320–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Setio AAA, Traverso A, de Bel T, Berens MS, van den Bogaard C, Cerello P, Chen H, Dou Q, Fantacci ME, Geurts B (2017) Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge. Med Image Analysis 42:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Vrielinck L, Lambrichts I, Politis C (2013a) Evaluation of 3 different registration techniques in image-guided bimaxillary surgery. J Craniofac Surg 24:1095–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Vrielinck L, Lambrichts I, Politis C (2013b) Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:522–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Politis C, Van Slycke S, Vrielinck L (2015) Accuracy of dental implant placement using CBCT-derived mucosa-supported stereolithographic template. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:862–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W (2014) Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:25–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma DS, Ioannidis A, Fehmer V, Michelotti G, Jung RE, Sailer I (2016) Threshold values for the perception of color changes of human teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 36(6):777–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valente IR, Cortez PC, Neto EC, Soares JM, de Albuquerque VH, Tavares JM (2016) Automatic 3D pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: a survey. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 124:91–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche N, Quirynen M (2010) Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clin Oral Implants Res 21(4):455–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M (2012) Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Impl Res 23:112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venosta D, Sun Y, Matthews F, Kruse AL, Lanzer M, Gander T, Gratz KW, Lubbers HT (2014) Evaluation of two dental registration-splint techniques for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:448–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H (2003) Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clinical oral implants res 14(1):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wismeijer D, Brägger U, Evans C, Kapos T, Kelly JR, Millen C, Winnteben JG, Zembic A, Taylor TD (2014) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding restorative materials and techniques for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 29(Suppl):137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U (2014) Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant supported reconstructions – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 29. Suppl:84–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz

    Claudio Rostetter

  2. Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Clinic of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Irena Sailer & Vincent Fehmer

Authors
  1. Claudio Rostetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irena Sailer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vincent Fehmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Sailer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Praxis für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Heinz-Theo Lübbers

  2. Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Karl Dula

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rostetter, C., Sailer, I., Fehmer, V. (2021). Digitale Volumentomographie zur Diagnostik in der oralen Implantatologie. In: Lübbers, HT., Dula, K. (eds) Digitale Volumentomographie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57405-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57405-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57404-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57405-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation