Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soziale Einflüsse durch Zuschauende im Sport

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sportpsychologie

Zusammenfassung

Wie Menschen durch die Anwesenheit anderer in Verhalten und Leistung beeinflusst werden, wird bereits mehr als 100 Jahre lang erforscht und gehört zu den wichtigsten sozialpsychologischen Fragestellungen im Sport. Dieses Kapitel stellt die Forschung zu sozialen Einflüssen durch Zuschauende dar. Es werden unterschiedliche Arten sozialer Einflussnahme beschrieben und Modelle zur Erklärung sozialer Einflüsse dargestellt. Neben Forschung zur bloßen Anwesenheit von Zuschauenden stellt das Kapitel auch Forschung zu aktiven Verhaltensweisen von Zuschauenden dar. Dies wird insbesondere im Zusammenhang mit dem Heimvorteil im Sport erforscht, da die höhere Siegeswahrscheinlichkeit von Heimmannschaften häufig den zahlenmäßig überlegenen Fans im eigenen Stadion zugeschrieben wird. Forschungsergebnisse stellen dies jedoch infrage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Agnew, G. A., & Carron, A. V. (1994). Crowd effects and the home advantage. Effets de la presence du public et avantage du terrain. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. S., & Jones, M. V. (2014). The “Home Advantage” in athletic competitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413513267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0067891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., Wolfson, S., Neave, N., & Moss, M. (2012). Perspectives on the home advantage: A comparison of football players, fans and referees. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. S., Moore, D., & Sanders, G. S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxial effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Hamilton, J. C., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1447–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage in sports championships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social “facilitation” as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 28, S. 1–51). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyko, R. H., Boyko, A. R., & Boyko, M. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football. Journal of Sports Science, 25(1), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601038576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The trouble with friendly faces: Skilled performance with a supportive audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. H. (1910). The group as a stimulus to mental activity [zitiert aus Hollingworth, H. L., 1935]. Science, 31(803), 761–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carron, A. V., Loughhead, T., & Bray, S. R. (2005). The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron’s (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgreen, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 24, S. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competition: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.14.1.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashiell, J. F. (1930). An experimental analysis of some group effects. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00751444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashiell, J. F. (1935). Experimental studies of the influence of social situations on the behavior of individual human adults. In C. Murchison (Hrsg.), A handbook of social psychology (S. 1097–1158). Worcester: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epting, L. K., Riggs, K. N., Knowles, J. D., & Hanky, J. J. (2011). Cheers vs. jeers: Effects of audience feedback on individual athletic performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill, M., Wolfson, S., & Little, L. (2014). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of venue: Do professional soccer players and managers concur with the conceptual home advantage framework? International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2014.932826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D. L. (1983). Spectator booing and the home advantage: A study of social influence in the basketball arena. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(3), 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmann, A. (1986). Sports spectators. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, A. W., & Sigall, H. (1989). The “Championship Choke” revisited: The role of fear of acquiring a negative identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(12), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01236.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., & Martin, R. (2014). Sozialer Einfluss. In K. Jonas, M. Hewstone, & W. Stroebe (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie (6. Aufl., S. 269–313). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband, R. W. (1931). Analysis of methods in human maze learning. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 39(2), 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1819–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. B. (2013). The home advantage in individual sports: An augmented review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. B. (2014). The home disadvantage in championship competitions: Team sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. B. (2018). Differences in home advantage between sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 34, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppett, L. (9. Januar 1972). The Sports Game. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/01/09/archives/the-sports-game-no-virginia-there-never-was-a-club-owner-santa.html.

  • Kozar, B. (1973). The effects of a supportive and nonsupportive audience upon learning a gross motor skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, D. A. (1923). Changes in motor control and individual variations under the influence of razzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6(3), 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, D. R., & Reifman, A. (1987). Spectator influence on basketball officiating. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 673–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, D., Maher, R., & Wang, J. (2014). Perspectives on choking in sport. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to sport and exercise psychology (S. 446–459). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, C., & Strauß, B. (2014). The psychology of decision making in sport officals. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to sport and exercise psychology (S. 223–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesagno, C., & Hill, D. M. (2013). Defintion of choking in sport: Re-conceptualization and debate. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meumann, E. (1904). Haus- und Schularbeit. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moede, W. (1920). Experimentelle Massenpsychologie. Leipzig: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. T., & Brylinsky, J. (1993). Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball. Journal of Sport Behavior, 16(2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, E. G., Neumann, G. L., Moffitt, R. L., & Thomas, P. R. (2016). The effects of the presence of others during a rowing exercise in a virtual reality environment. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 22, 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N., & Williams, M. (1999). Crowd influence on decisions in association football. The Lancet, 353, 1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N., & Williams, M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, A, M., Newell, S. M., & Gale, S. (1996). Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer matches. Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessin, J., & Husband, R. W. (1933). Effects of social stimulation on human maze learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(2), 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R., & Pollard, G. (2005). Long-term trends in home advantage in professional team sports in North America and England (1876– 2003). Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Components of home advantage in 157 national soccer leagues worldwide. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12, 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R., & Armatas, V. (2017). Factors affecting home advantage in football World Cup qualification. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, S. (1993). The effect of the audience on the home advantage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(3), 1123–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., Philipps, S. T., Boniecki, K. A., & Schlenker, D. R. (1995). Championship pressures: Choking or triumphing in one’s own territory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 632–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., & Barsky, S. F. (1977). The home advantage. Social Forces, 55(3), 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. L., Anderson-Hanley, C., & Arciero, P. J. (2012). Virtual and live social facilitation while exergaming: Competitiveness moderates exercise intensity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(2), 252–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K. W. (1958). A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. American Psychologist, 13(4), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staufenbiel, K. (2015). Home advantage in sports from a social cognitive perspective. Dissertation thesis. University of Muenster, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staufenbiel, K., Lobinger, B., & Strauß, B. (2015). Home advantage in soccer – A matter of expectations, goal setting and tactical decisions of coaches? Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 1932–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1018929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staufenbiel, K., Riedl, D., & Strauss, B. (2018). Learning to be advantaged: Home advantage in high-level youth soccer. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1142463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B. (1999). Wenn Fans ihre Mannschaft zur Niederlage klatschen. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B. (2002a). The impact of supportive spectator behavior on performance in team sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33(4), 372–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B. (2002b). Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Bierschwale, J. (2008). Zuschauer und der Heimvorteil in der Handballbundesliga. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 15, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010.15.3.96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Höfer, E. (2001). The home advantage in team sports. In A. Papaioammou, M. Goudas, & Y. Theodorakis (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Sport Psychology (Bd. 4, S. 210–212). Thessaloniki: Christodoulidi Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., Riedl, D., Staufenbiel, K., & Heuer, A. (2014). Global home advantage in soccer. Paper presented at the SCAPPS 2014 Annual Conference, London Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & MacMahon, C. (2014). The influence of spectators in sports. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to Sport and Exercise Psychology (S. 213–222). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & MacMahon, C. (in press). Heimvorteil. In A. Güllich & M. Krüger (Hrsg.), Sport in Kultur und Gesellschaft. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirer, J., & Rampey, M. (1979). Effects of abusive spectator behavior on the performance of home and visiting intercollegiate basketball teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(3), 1047–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. E. (1925). The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20(2), 142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2010). Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(4), 483–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven, N. (2011). Supporters are not necessary for the home advantage: Evidence from same-stadium derbies and games without an audience. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2785–2792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00865.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (Hrsg.). (1969). Animal social psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland

    Bernd Strauß

  2. Wiesbaden, Deutschland

    Kathrin Staufenbiel

Authors
  1. Bernd Strauß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathrin Staufenbiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Strauß .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachgruppe Sportwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

    Julia Schüler

  2. Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Mirko Wegner

  3. Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Henning Plessner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strauß, B., Staufenbiel, K. (2020). Soziale Einflüsse durch Zuschauende im Sport. In: Schüler, J., Wegner, M., Plessner, H. (eds) Sportpsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56801-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56802-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation