Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirische Ergebnisse des Hoffnungsbarometers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Positive Psychologie der Hoffnung

  • 8497 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden Ergebnisse des Hoffnungsbarometers in Deutschland und der Schweiz vorgestellt. Befragt wurde die Öffentlichkeit über die Bedeutung von Hoffnung, über ihre Zufriedenheit und Zukunftserwartungen, über ihre persönlichen und gesellschaftlichen Hoffnungen, über die Quellen von Hoffnung sowie über das Glück und die Erfüllung im Leben. Die Ergebnisse von mehr als 40.000 Teilnehmenden lassen die Wichtigkeit von Hoffnung erkennen. Bezüglich der spezifischen Hoffnungen der Menschen wird zwischen eudaimonischen (sozialen, sinnorientierten, altruistischen) und hedonisch-materiellen (Geld, Erfolg, Vergnügen) Hoffnungsobjekten differenziert. Die bedeutendsten Quellen von Hoffnung finden sich im familiären und sozialen Umfeld und in einem ausgeprägten Selbstvertrauen. Eine besondere Rolle spielt für manche Menschen der religiöse und spirituelle Glaube. Hoffnung wird als wesentliches Phänomen im Zusammenhang mit einem gesunden, glücklichen und erfüllten Leben aufgefasst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Averill, J. R., & Sundararajan, L. (2005). Hope as rhetoric: Cultural narratives of wishing and coping. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 133–165). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 471–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, D., De Ville, B., & Suen, E. (1991). A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 18(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Brooks, K. P., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufault, K., & Martocchio, B. C. (1985). Symposium on compassionate care and the dying experience. Hope: its spheres and dimensions. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 20(2), 379–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. (2015). The OECD Better Life Initiative: How’s Life? and the measurement of well‐being. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliott, J. A. (2005). What have we done with hope? A brief history. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 3–45). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. C., Post, R. D., & Paige, A. B. (1975). Hope as a psychiatric variable. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(2), 324–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farran, C. J., Herth, K. A., & Popovich, J. M. (1995). Hope and hopelessness: Critical clinical constructs. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferring, D., Balducci, C., Burholt, V., Wenger, C., Thissen, F., Weber, G., & Hallberg, I. (2004). Life satisfaction of older people in six European countries: Findings from the European study on adult well-being. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 15–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herth, K. (2005). State of the science of hope in nursing practice: Hope, the nurse, and the patient. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 169–213). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. Y., Plante, T., & Lackey, K. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara brief compassion scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s compassionate love scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56(4), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Shevlin, M., Goodfellow, B., & Butler, L. D. (2006). Assessing positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity: A short form of the changes in outlook questionnaire. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 11(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjell, O., Daukantaité, D., Hefferon, K., & Sikström, S. (2016). Harmony in Life Scale complements the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 126, 893–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krafft, A. M., Martin-Krumm, C., & Fenouillet, F. (2017). Adaptation, further elaboration, and validation of a scale to measure hope as perceived by people. Assessment, Apr 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117700724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2011). Meaning in life and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16(2), 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, G. S. (1998). The Helping Attitude Scale: A new measure of prosocial tendencies. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsian, N., & Dunning, T. A. (2009). Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: A psychometric process. Global Journal of Health Science, 1(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45(5), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), The exploration of happiness: Present and future perspectives (pp. 117–139). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, T., & Becker, P. (2007). Fragebogen zu Lebensbedeutungen und Lebenssinn: LeBe. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Eds.). (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scioli, A., Ricci, M., Nyugen, T., & Scioli, E. R. (2011). Hope: Its nature and measurement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(2), 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezackova, A., & Krafft, A. (2016). Hope – A driving force of optimal human development. In J. Mohan, M. Sehgal (Eds.), Idea of Excellence: Multiple Perspectives. Panjab University Chandigarh: Publication Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staats, S. (1989). Hope: A comparison of two self-report measures for adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(2), 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Bravata, E., & Storch, J. B. (2004). Psychometric investigation of the Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire - Short-form. Pastoral Psychology, 52(6), 479–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennen, H., Affleck, G., & Tennen, R. (2002). Clipped feathers: The theory and measurement of hope. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J. (2016). Persistence Scale. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, T., Mieg, H., & Güntert, S. (2006). Frei-gemeinnützige Arbeit. In S. Mühlpfordt, P. Richter (Hrsg.), Ehrenamt und Erwerbsarbeit. Hampp: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL-SRPB Group (2002). WHOQOL-SRPB Users Manual: Scoring and coding for the WHOQOL SRPB field test instrument. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T. M., & Masten, A. S. (2004). Fostering the future: Resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology. In P. A. Linley, S. Joseph (Hrsg.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 521–539). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. swissfuture, Wittenbach, Schweiz

    Andreas M. Krafft

  2. swissfuture, Basel, Schweiz

    Andreas M. Walker

Authors
  1. Andreas M. Krafft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas M. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krafft, A.M., Walker, A.M. (2018). Empirische Ergebnisse des Hoffnungsbarometers. In: Positive Psychologie der Hoffnung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56201-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56201-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56200-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56201-7

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation