Skip to main content

The History of Minimally Invasive Approach in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • 1364 Accesses

Abstract

The history of the modern minimally invasive (MI) approach to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) is short, but it has a very rich background. The development of minimally invasive surgery includes progress in endoscopy, development of intraoperative navigation, tissue engineering (TE), and, specifically for maxillofacial surgery, development of mandibular distraction. In endoscopic surgery, the minimally invasive approach started when illumination and observation were combined with irrigation/suction and intervention with microsurgical instruments. Frame-based stereotaxy of neurosurgery did not contribute to maxillofacial surgery. The selective intraoperative localization of anatomical structures of the facial part of the skull became possible with further computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) progress that stimulated the development of frameless stereotaxy. The method of distraction osteogenesis is based on the tension-stress principle developed by G.A. Ilizarov in the 1950s and 1960s. Osteogenetic treatment of the jaws has its own history which started in 1799, well before Ilizarov was born. The engineering of cartilage and bone tissue brought benefits to the treatment of disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Regenerative dentistry became another main field in the application of tissue engineering in OMS.

Before we condemn or applaud an operator, before we adopt him as an example, we should carefully examine his reasons for any given mode of operation.

(M. Jourdain. A Treatise on the Diseases and Surgical Operations of the Mouth, 1851)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radojcić B, Jokić R, Grebeldinger S, Meljnikov I, Radojić N. History of minimally invasive surgery. Med Pregl. 2009;62(11–12):597–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hippocrates. On hemorrhoids. In: Adams F, editor. The Genuine works of Hippocrates. Vol. 2. London: Sydenham Society; 1848. p. 825–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Labordette. Note sur le Spéculum Laryngien. Paris: Adrien Delahaye; 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bozzini P. Der Lichtleiter oder Beschreibung einer einfachen Vorrichtung und ihrer Anwendung zur Erleuchtung innerer Höhlen und Zwischenräume des menschlichen Köpers. Weimar; 1807.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desormeaux AJ. The endoscope, and its application to the diagnosis and treatment of affections of the genito-urinary passages (Engl. transl. by R.P. Hunt). Chicago: Robert Pergus’ Suns; 1867. p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Desormeaux AJ. De l’Endoscope et de ses Applications au Diagnostic et au Traitement des Affections de l’Urèthre et de la Vessie. Paris: Baillière et Fils; 1865.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cruise FR. The endoscope as an aid in diagnosis and treatment of disease. Dublin: Fannin and Company; 1865.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newman R. The endoscope. Albany: Weed, Parsons and Company; 1872. p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nitze M. Lehrbuch der Kystoskopie. Ihre Technik und Klinische Bedeutung. Wiesbaden: Verlag von Bergmann; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nitze M. Kystophotographischer Atlas. Wiesbaden: Verlag von Bergmann; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nitze M. Lehrbuch der Kystoskopie. Ihre Technik und Klinische Bedeutung. Zweite Auflage. Wiesbaden: Verlag von Bergmann; 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bush IM, Whitmore WF Jr. A fiberoptic ultraviolet cystoscope. J Urol. 1967;97(1):156–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopresti PA, Hilmi A, Cifarelli P. The foroblique fiberoptic esophagoscope. Am J Gastroenterol. 1967;47(1):11–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rider JA, Puletti EJ, Moeller HC. The fiber duodenoscope: a preliminary report. Am J Gastroenterol. 1967;47(1):21–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson C. Peroral endoscopy and laryngeal surgery. Saint Louis: The Laryngoscope Company; 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brünings W. Direct laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and Oesophagoscopy (Transl. and ed. by W.G. Howarth). London: Baillière, Tindal and Cox; 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Czermak JN. On the laryngoscope and its employment in physiology and medicine (Transl. G.D. Gibb). In: Selected monographs. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fournié E. Étude Pratique sur le Laryngoscope et sur l’Application des Remèdes Topiques. Paris: Delahaye; 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mackenzie M. Du laryngoscope. Paris: Baillière et Fils; 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howarth W. A set of modified Jackson’s tubes and instruments for peroral endoscopy. Proc R Soc Med. 1925;18(Laryngol Sect):48–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore I. Demonstration of some new instruments recently designed for the removal of foreign bodies from the lungs by per-oral endoscopy. Proc R Soc Med. 1919;12(Laryngol Sect):20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tilley H. A surgical contretemps, illustrating the value of endoscopy. Proc R Soc Med. 1918;11(Laryngol Sect):73–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Negus VE. Peroral endoscopy: simplified technique. Br Med J. 1939;2(4120):1223–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Marmary Y. A novel and non-invasive method for the removal of salivary gland stones. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:585–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iro H, Benzel W, Zenk J, Fodra C, Heinritz HH. Minimally invasive treatment of sialolithiasis using extracorporeal shock waves. HNO. 1993;41:311–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Katz P. New method of examination of the salivary glands: the fiberscope. Inf Dent. 1990;72(10):785–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz P. Endoscopy of the salivary glands. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1991;34(1–2):110–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Trappe M, Marsot-Dupuch K, Le Roux C. Study of the salivary glands in 1990. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1991;34(1–2):98–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Katz P. New treatment method for salivary lithiasis. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1993;114(5):379–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gundlach P, Hopf J, Linnarz M. Introduction of a new diagnostic procedure: salivary duct endoscopy (sialendoscopy) clinical evaluation of sialendoscopy, sialography, and X-ray imaging. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2(6):294–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nahlieli O, Neder A, Baruchin AM. Salivary gland endoscopy: a new technique for diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(12):1240–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nahlieli O, Baruchin AM. Sialoendoscopy: three years’ experience as a diagnostic and treatment modality. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(9):912–8;discussion 919–20.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yuasa K, Nakhyama E, Ban S, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Shimizu M, Kanda S. Submandibular gland duct endoscopy. Diagnostic value for salivary duct disorders in comparison to conventional radiography, sialography, and ultrasonography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(5):578–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McGurk M, Esudier M. Removing salivary gland stones. Br J Hosp Med. 1995;54(5):184–5; discussion 185–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Iro H, Wessel B, Benzel W, Zenk J, Meier J, Nitsche N, Wirtz PM, Ell C. Tissue reactions with administration of piezoelectric shock waves in lithotripsy of salivary calculi. Laryngorhinootologie. 1990;69(2):102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nahlieli O, Shacham R, Zaguri A. Combined external lithotripsy and endoscopic techniques for advanced sialolithiasis cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(2):347–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Detsch SG, Cunningham WT, Langloss JM. Endoscopy as an aid to endodontic diagnosis. J Endod. 1979;5(2):60–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Held SA, Kao YH, Wells DW. Endoscope—an endodontic application. J Endod. 1996;22(6):327–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bahcall JK, DiFiore PM, Poulakidas TK. An endoscopic technique for endodontic surgery. J Endod. 1999;25(2):132–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bahcall JK, Barss JT. Orascopy: a vision for the new millennium, Part 2. Dent Today. 1999;18(9):82–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glickman GN, Koch KA. 21st-century endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(Suppl):39S–46S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Oppel F, Mulch G, Brock M. Endoscopic section of the sensory trigeminal root, the glossopharyngeal nerve, and the cranial part of the vagus for intractable facial pain caused by upper jaw carcinoma. Surg Neurol. 1981;16(2):92–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Adant JP. Endoscopically assisted suspension in facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(1):178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dittmar C. Über die Lage des sogenannten Gefässzentrums in der Medulla oblongata. Ber Sächs Ges Wiss Leipzig. 1873;25:449–69.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zernov DN. Encephalometer. The device for estimation of the parts of the brain in humans. Proc Soc Physicomed Moscow Univ. 1889;2:70–80. [Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  46. Altukhov NV. Encephalometric investigations of the brain relative to the sex, age, and skull indices. Moscow; 1891. [Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  47. Horsley V, Clarke RH. The structure and functions of the cerebellum examined by a new method. Brain. 1908;31:45–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Clark G. The use of the Horsley-Clarke instrument on the rat. Science. 1939;90(2326):92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Marks M, Lee AJ. Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science. 1947;106(2754):349–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hayne RA, Stowell A, Darrough JB. The use of the human Horsley Clarke stereotaxic apparatus; selective section of the thalamo-frontal tracts. Surg Forum. 1951:380–5.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hassler R, Riechert T. A special method of stereotactic brain operation. Proc R Soc Med. 1955;48(6):469–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hassler R, Riechert T, Mundinger F, Umbach W, Gangberger JA. Physiological observations in stereotaxic operations in extrapyramidal motor disturbances. Brain. 1960;83:337–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Horton CE, McFadden JT. Stereotactic localization of a facial foreign body. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47(6):598–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jones D, Christopherson DA, Washington JT, Hafermann MD, Rieke JW, Travaglini JJ, Vermeulen SS. A frameless method for stereotactic radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1993;66(792):1142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hassfeld S, Mühling J, Zöller J. Intraoperative navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24(1 Pt 2):111–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bohner P, Holler C, Hassfeld S. Operation planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1997;2(3–4):153–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hassfeld S, Muehling J, Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Lutze T, Schulz HJ. Intraoperative guidance in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997;211(4):277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schramm A, Gellrich N-C, Schmelzeisen R. Navigational surgery of the facial skeleton. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Baierus JJ. Adagiorum medicinalium centuria, quam recensuit variisque animadversionibus illustravit. Francofurti et Lipsiae Kohlesius; 1718.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ilizarov GA, Deviatov AA. Surgical lengthening of the shin with simultaneous correction of deformities. Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1969;30(3):32–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ilizarov GA, Soĭbel’man LM. Clinical and experimental data on bloodless lengthening of lower extremities. Eksp Khir Anesteziol. 1969;14(4):27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ilizarov GA, editor. The Transosseous Tension-Stress Osteosynthesis in Traumatology and Orthopedics. [Чрескостный компрессионный и дистракционный остеосинтез в травматологии и ортопедии.]. Vol. 1. Kurgan: Sovetskoe Zauralye; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bignardi A, Boero G, Barale I, Mazzinari S, Marro P. Our experience in the bloodless treatment of fractures with the DOS (dynamic osteosynthesis) external fixation apparatus based on the Ilizarov principle. Chir Organi Mov. 1982;68(1):51–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Schewior T, Schewior H. Mechanical and technical aspects of an external fixator made of rings and Kirschner wires (using the Wittmoser and Ilizarov methods). Alternatives to plate osteosynthesis. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1984;14(6):263–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Louis R, Jouve JL, Borrione F. Anatomic factors in the femoral implantation of the Ilizarov external fixator. Surg Radiol Anat. 1987;9(1):5–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Jourdain M. A treatise on the diseases and surgical operations of the mouth. Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston; 1851.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Heath C. Injuries and diseases of the jaws. London: Churchill; 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Huebsch RF. The use of cortical bone to stimulate osteogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1954;7(12):1273–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. McCarthy J, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne C, Grayson B. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Patrick CW Jr, Mikos AG, McIntire LV, editors. Frontiers in tissue engineering. Oxford, New York: Elsevier Science; 1998. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Deaton JG. New parts for old: the age of organ transplants. Palisades: Franklin Publishing Company; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Weng YL. The experimental study of tissue engineered mandible condyle in the shape of human. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2000;9(2):94–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Weng Y, Cao Y, Silva CA, Vacanti MP, Vacanti CA. Tissue-engineered composites of bone and cartilage for mandible condylar reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(2):185–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Detamore MS, Athanasiou KA. Motivation, characterization, and strategy for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Tissue Eng. 2003;9(6):1065–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Shterenshis MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shterenshis, M. (2018). The History of Minimally Invasive Approach in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In: Nahlieli, O. (eds) Minimally Invasive Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54592-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54592-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54590-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54592-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics