Skip to main content

Nichtgeburtshilflicher Eingriff bei Schwangeren

  • Chapter
Die geburtshilfliche Anästhesie
  • 7528 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In 0,5–2% aller Schwangerschaften wird ein nichtgeburtshilflicher Eingriff notwendig. Die häufigsten Indikationen resultieren aus dem Vorliegen einer Appendizitis, einer Cholezystitis, einer Harnstauung, von Adnex-Prozessen sowie von Traumata infolge von Unfällen in Haushalt oder Verkehr. Bei der Wahl von Anästhetika und Operationstechnik müssen die Risiken für die Mutter und das ungeborene Kind berücksichtigt werden. Lässt sich ein Eingriff nicht bis auf einen Zeitpunkt nach Beendigung der Schwangerschaft verschieben, so gilt es, das optimale perioperative Management inklusive präoperativer Untersuchungen und postoperativer Überwachung und Analgesie interdisziplinär (Chirurg, Anästhesist, Geburtshelfer) abzustimmen. Eine Spinalanästhesie geht mit der geringsten Medikamentenbelastung einher. Allgemeinanästhesien sind sicher bei korrekter Medikamentenauswahl und Aufrechterhaltung von adäquater mütterlicher Oxygenierung, Normokapnie, Normothermie und ausreichendem arteriellen Druck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Biehl DR, Yarnell R, Wade JG, Sitar D (1983) The uptake of isoflurane by the foetal lamb in utero: effect on regional blood flow. Anesth Can Anaesth Soc J 30: 581–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky JB, Cohen EN, Brown BW, Wu ML, Whitcher C (1980) Surgery during pregnancy and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138: 1165–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Celleno D, Capogna G, Tomassetti M, Costantino P, Di Feo G, Nisini R (1989) Neurobehavioural effects of propofol on the neonate following elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 62: 649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Kerem R, Railton C, Oren D, Lishner M, Koren G (2005) Pregnancy outcome following non-obstetric surgical intervention. Am J Surg 190: 467–73

    Google Scholar 

  • De Amici D, Delmonte P, Martinotti L, Gasparoni A, Zizzi S, Ramajoli I, Ramajoli F (2001) Can anesthesiologic strategies for caesarean section influence newborn jaundice? A retrospective and prospective study. Biol Neonat 79: 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan PG, Pope WDB, Cohen MM, Greer N (1986) Fetal risk of anesthesia and surgery during pregnancy. Anesthesiology 64: 790–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler-Sandberg E (2000) Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit – Antibiotikawahl bei Infektionen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 97: A 1158–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidelines Committee of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2008) Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 22: 849–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Han IH, Kuh SU, Kim JH, Chin DK, Kim KS, Yoon YS, Jin BH, Cho YE (2008) Clinical approach and surgical strategy for spinal diseases in pregnant women. A report of ten cases. Spine 33: E614–E619

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck M, Fresenius M (2007) Repetitorium Anästhesiologie, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi H, Takagi S, Zhang K, Furui I, Ozaki M (2015) Effect of lateral tilt angle on the volume of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in pregnant and nonpregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 122: 286–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson H, Granger S, Price R, Rollins M, Earle D, Richardson W, Fanelli R (2008) Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 22 (1917–1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Chari R, Maslovitz S et al. (2015) Guidelines for the management of a pregnant trauma patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 37: 553–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz-Böss I, Solomayer E, Strik M, Raspe C (2014) Abdominaleingriffe in der Schwangerschaft – eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111: 465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, Kessin C, Preston PG, Lobo EP (1998) Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology 88: 1467–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill-Jones RP, Rodrigues LV, Moir DD, Spence AA (1972) Anaesthetic practice and pregnancy. Controlled survey of women anaesthetists in the United Kingdom. Lancet 1: 1326–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort B, Katz VL,Watson WJ (1993) The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gnecol Obstet 177: 371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczkowski KM (2004) Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia? Obst Gynec Surv 59: 52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunitz O, Rossaint R (2005) Anästhesie in der Schwangerschaft. Chirurg 76: 737–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleford J (2004) Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anesth 51: 586–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazze RI, Fujinaga M, Baden JM (1987) Reproductive and teratogenic effects of nitrous oxide, fentanyl and their combination in Sprague-Dawley rats. Br J Anaesth 59: 1291–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazze RI, Källén B (1989) Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161: 1178–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205: 534–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier FJ, Diemunsch P, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Mignon A, Fischler M, Malinovsky JM, Bolandard F, Aya AG, Raucoules-Aimé M, Chassard D, Keita H, Rigouzzo A, Le Gouez A; CAESAR Working Group (2014) 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs Ringer’s lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial. Br J Anaesth 113: 459–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Sanz C, Pascual-Pedreno A, Picazo-Yeste JS, Seoane-Gonzalez JB (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: between personal experiences and scientific evidence. J Am Coll Surg 205:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauheimer D, Kollath C, Geldner G (2012) Modified rapid sequence induction for Caesarian sections : case series on the use of rocuronium and sugammadex. Anaesthesist 61: 691–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ma KC, Wong AS, Lee BB, Ng FF (2006) Maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil at induction of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Anesthesiology 104: 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus WE, Lauritzen C (2014) Medikamente und Schadstoffe in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit. 22. Aktualisierung. Spitta, Balingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Reedy MB, Galan HL, Bean-Lijewski JD, Carnes A, Knight AB, Kuehl TJ (1995) Maternal and fetal effects of laparoscopic insufflation in the gravid baboon. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2: 399–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Reedy MB, Källen B, Kuehl TJ (1997) Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177: 673–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitman E, Flood P (2011) Anaesthetic considerations for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Brit J Anaesth 107: i72–i78

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA (1999) Management of anesthesia for the pregnant surgical patient. Anesthesiology 91:1159–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott C, Schmidt H (1998) Allgemeinanästhesie in der Schwangerschaft. Anaesthesist 47: 525–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CA, Tang T, Walsh SR (2008) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg 6: 339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LP, Paech MJ (2008) Neuroanesthesia for the pregnant woman. Anesth Analg 107 (193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei PL, Keller JJ, Liang HH, Lin HC (2012) Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 16: 1204–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg L, Steele RG, Pugh R, Higgins S, Herbert M, Story D (2005) The pregnant trauma patient. Anaesth Intensive Care 33: 167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss BM, von Segesser LK, Alon E, Seifert B, Turina MI (1998) Outcome of cardiovascular surgery and pregnancy: a systematic review of the period 1984–1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179: 1643–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdy MM, Mitchell AA, Tinker SC, Parker SE, Werler MM (2013) Periconceptual use of opioids and the risk of neural tube defects. Obstet Gynecol 122: 838–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy – risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5: 192–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wallenborn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallenborn, J. (2017). Nichtgeburtshilflicher Eingriff bei Schwangeren. In: Kranke, P. (eds) Die geburtshilfliche Anästhesie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54375-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54375-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54374-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54375-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics