Summary
This chapter introduces the term technological singularity, and analyses the varying and ambiguous ways it is used. It looks at the difficulty in predicting what would happen with “human comparable” artificial intelligences (AI), and what can nevertheless be said about such an occurence. The track record for predictions in AI by experts is a poor one, for solid theoretical reasons backed up with empirical prediction evidence. However, there are strong arguments implying that such an AI could become extremely powerful, though one or another of various plausible routes—not necessarily requiring the AI to be “superintelligent”, either. Then the chapter demonstrates that such an AI has a non-insignificant chance of doing dangerous for humanity as a whole. The difficulty in reasoning about this subject and the uncertainty surrounding it cannot be seen as excuses to do nothing—indeed a position that AI would be safe is a position of great overconfidence, far beyond what can be warranted by the evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, Stuart. Smarter than us: The rise of machine intelligence. MIRI, 2014.
Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. OUP Oxford, 2014.
Cooke, Roger M., and Louis HJ Goossens. “Expert judgement elicitation for risk assessments of critical infrastructures.” Journal of risk research 7.6 (2004): 643–656.
Eden, Amnon H., Eric Steinhart, David Pearce, and James H. Moor. “Singularity hypotheses: an overview.” In Singularity Hypotheses, pp. 1–12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. Harvard
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, 2011.
Klein, Gary. “The recognition-primed decision (RPD) model: Looking back, looking forward.” Naturalistic decision making (1997): 285–292.
Sandberg, Anders. “An overview of models of technological singularity.” Roadmaps to AGI and the Future of AGI Workshop, Lugano, Switzerland, March. Vol. 8. 2010.
Shanteau, James, et al. “Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not.” European Journal of Operational Research 136.2 (2002): 253–263.
Tetlock, Philip. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?. Princeton University Press, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, S. (2017). Introduction to the Technological Singularity. In: Callaghan, V., Miller, J., Yampolskiy, R., Armstrong, S. (eds) The Technological Singularity. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54033-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54033-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54031-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54033-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)