Skip to main content

Greenlight-Laser-Vaporisation der Prostata

  • Chapter
Endoskopische Urologie
  • 2945 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Seit vielen Jahrzehnten stellt die transurethrale Elektroresektion der Prostata (TURP) den Goldstandard bei der operativen Behandlung der symptomatischen benignen Prostatahyperplasie (BPH) dar. Dennoch ist die TURP ein invasives, technisch anspruchsvolles und potenziell risikobehaftetes Operationsverfahren. Die perioperative Morbidität dieses Eingriffs steigt mit dem Adenomgewicht, dem Lebensalter und kardiopulmonalen Begleiterkrankungen erheblich an. Insbesondere das Blutungs- und Einschwemmungsrisiko stehen hierbei im Vordergrund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • S2e Leitlinie Therapie des Benignen Prostatasyndroms (BPS) (2014) Arbeitskreis Benignes Prostatasyndrom der Akademie der Deutschen Urologen – (DGU)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelke M, et al. (2013) EAU guidelines on the tratment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol.2013;64:118-140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC (2002) Transurethral prostatectomy: Immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3.885 patients. J Urol 167: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek RS, Barrett DM, Kuntzmann RS (1998) High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP/532) laser vaporization prostatectomy: 24 hours later. Urology 51:254–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann A, Muir GH,et al. (2012) 180 W XPS GreenLight laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia:early safety, effiacy, and perioperative outcome after 201 procedures. Eur Urol. 2012; 61:600-607

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir G, Gomez SF, Bachmann A et al. (2008) Techniques and Training with GreenLight HPS 120-W Laser Therapy of the Prostate: Position Paper. Eur Urol Suppl 7: 370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosette J, et al. (2015) Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global GreenLight Laser Study: Outcomes from a contemporary series of 713 patients. Int J Urol. 2015:

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich E, Schiefelbein F, Schön G (2007) Technique and Short-Term Outcome of Green Light Laser (KTP, 80 W) Vaporization of the Prostate. Eur Urol 52(6): 1632-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefelbein F, Noe M, Schön G (2011) Technik der XPS-Laservaporisation der Prostata Urologe A Suppl 1: 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Altay B, et al. (2015) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporization for benign prostate hyperplasia: 12-month safety and efficacy results for glands larger than 80 mL. Lasers Med Sci. 2015; 30 (1): 317-23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann A, et al. (2014) 180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial-The GOLIATH Study European Urology, Volume 65 Issue 5 931-942

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann A, et al. (2015) A European multicenter randomized non inferiority trial comparing 180 W GreenLight XPS Laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 12 month results of the GOLIATH study J Urol, 2015; 193 (2): 570-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, et al. (2015) A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing GreenLight-XPS Laser Vaporization of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostativ Obstruction: Two-yr Outcomes of the GOLIATH Study. EUR Urol. 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueber PA, et al. (2015) Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia using the 180 Watt System: Multicenter Study of the Impact of Prostate Size on Safety and Outcomes. J Urol. 2015; 194 (2); 462-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunken C, Seitz C, Woo HH, (2015) A systematic review of experience of 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in 1640 men. BJU Int 2015; 116 (4): 531-7

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE Guidance (2016) GreenLight XPS for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia Guidance published 14 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson I, Tubaro A, Muir G, Greenlight Laser System for Day-Case Surgery European Medical Journal January 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiefelbein, F. (2018). Greenlight-Laser-Vaporisation der Prostata. In: Hofmann, R. (eds) Endoskopische Urologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53981-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53981-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53980-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53981-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics