Abstract
The focus of the cytologist should be the well-being of the patient. The goal of a lymph node (LN) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) should be to provide a diagnosis and accompanying information sufficient to enable the clinical team to deliver the best care. The cornerstone of achieving this goal is good communication. To insure that the cytologist and clinical team are using the same language, current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) terminology and diagnostic criteria must be used, and the report should state that WHO criteria are being used. For example, antiquated and/or vague terms should not be used (e.g., “malignant lymphoma” or “small cell lymphoma”). When possible, precise subtype diagnoses should be provided using exact WHO terminology. When the findings are insufficient for a WHO subtype diagnosis, a broader categorical diagnosis should be used, but as specific as possible (e.g., low-grade B-cell lymphoma). Lastly, when further studies are required, it should be stated explicitly (e.g., “For a more precise diagnosis, an excisional biopsy would be required.”).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Reading
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:2375–90.
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405.
Smith A, Crouch S, Lax S, et al. Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1575–84.
Johnson NA, Slack GW, Savage KJ, et al. Concurrent expression of MYC and BCL2 in diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma treated with Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3452–9.
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–e48.
Swerdlow SHCE, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, editors. WHO classification of tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues Lyon. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008.
Ouansafi I, He B, Fraser C, Nie K, Mathew S, Bhanji R, Hoda R, Arabadjief M, Knowles D, Cerutti A, Orazi A, Tam W. Transformation of follicular lymphoma to plasmablastic lymphoma with c-myc gene rearrangement. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:972–81.
Orazi A, Foucar K, Knowles D, Weiss LM. Chapter on role of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of Hematolymphoid Neoplasm by Rana Hoda, in Knowles’ neoplastic hematology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia Wolters Kluwer; 2013. p. 293–321.
Barrena S, Almeida J, Del Carmen G-MM, López A, Rasillo A, Sayagués JM, Rivas RA, Gutiérrez ML, Ciudad J, Flores T, Balanzategui A, Caballero MD, Orfao A. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping of fine-needle aspiration specimens: utility in the diagnosis and classification of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Histopathology. 2011;58:906–18.
Ali AE, Morgen EK, Geddie WR, et al. Classifying B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma by using MIB-1 proliferative index in fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:166–72.
Pambuccian SE, Bardales RH. Lymph node cytopathology; essentials in cytopathology. New York: Springer; 2011.
Savage EC, Vanderheyden AD, Bell AM, et al. Independent diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry obtained from fine-needle aspirates: a 10-year experience with 451 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:304–9.
Zhang S, Abreo F, Lowery-Nordberg M, et al. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis and classification of lymphoproliferative disorders on fine-needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:105–12.
Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Vicandi B, López-Ferrer P, et al. Value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the initial diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease. Analysis of 188 cases with an emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. ActaCytol. 2001;45:300–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ely, S.A. (2017). Cytologic Diagnosis of Lymphoproliferative Disorders by Morphology and Ancillary Techniques. In: Diagnostic Liquid-Based Cytology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53905-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53905-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53903-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53905-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)