Skip to main content

Cytologic Diagnosis of Lymphoproliferative Disorders by Morphology and Ancillary Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic Liquid-Based Cytology
  • 1466 Accesses

Abstract

The focus of the cytologist should be the well-being of the patient. The goal of a lymph node (LN) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) should be to provide a diagnosis and accompanying information sufficient to enable the clinical team to deliver the best care. The cornerstone of achieving this goal is good communication. To insure that the cytologist and clinical team are using the same language, current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) terminology and diagnostic criteria must be used, and the report should state that WHO criteria are being used. For example, antiquated and/or vague terms should not be used (e.g., “malignant lymphoma” or “small cell lymphoma”). When possible, precise subtype diagnoses should be provided using exact WHO terminology. When the findings are insufficient for a WHO subtype diagnosis, a broader categorical diagnosis should be used, but as specific as possible (e.g., low-grade B-cell lymphoma). Lastly, when further studies are required, it should be stated explicitly (e.g., “For a more precise diagnosis, an excisional biopsy would be required.”).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:2375–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith A, Crouch S, Lax S, et al. Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1575–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson NA, Slack GW, Savage KJ, et al. Concurrent expression of MYC and BCL2 in diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma treated with Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3452–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–e48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swerdlow SHCE, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, editors. WHO classification of tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues Lyon. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ouansafi I, He B, Fraser C, Nie K, Mathew S, Bhanji R, Hoda R, Arabadjief M, Knowles D, Cerutti A, Orazi A, Tam W. Transformation of follicular lymphoma to plasmablastic lymphoma with c-myc gene rearrangement. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:972–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Orazi A, Foucar K, Knowles D, Weiss LM. Chapter on role of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of Hematolymphoid Neoplasm by Rana Hoda, in Knowles’ neoplastic hematology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia Wolters Kluwer; 2013. p. 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barrena S, Almeida J, Del Carmen G-MM, López A, Rasillo A, Sayagués JM, Rivas RA, Gutiérrez ML, Ciudad J, Flores T, Balanzategui A, Caballero MD, Orfao A. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping of fine-needle aspiration specimens: utility in the diagnosis and classification of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Histopathology. 2011;58:906–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali AE, Morgen EK, Geddie WR, et al. Classifying B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma by using MIB-1 proliferative index in fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pambuccian SE, Bardales RH. Lymph node cytopathology; essentials in cytopathology. New York: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Savage EC, Vanderheyden AD, Bell AM, et al. Independent diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometry obtained from fine-needle aspirates: a 10-year experience with 451 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang S, Abreo F, Lowery-Nordberg M, et al. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis and classification of lymphoproliferative disorders on fine-needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Vicandi B, López-Ferrer P, et al. Value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the initial diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease. Analysis of 188 cases with an emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. ActaCytol. 2001;45:300–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ely, S.A. (2017). Cytologic Diagnosis of Lymphoproliferative Disorders by Morphology and Ancillary Techniques. In: Diagnostic Liquid-Based Cytology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53905-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53905-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53903-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53905-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics