Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying the Adoption Process for Electronic Health Services: A Qualitative Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Boundaryless Hospital

Abstract

The implementation of information and communication technology in the health care sector is of considerable interest, since it has been proved that it leads to benefits like improved health care quality, patient safety and satisfaction as well as favorable cost-effectiveness compared to traditional services.

However, the implementation of electronic health services (e-health services) as innovative interventions or tools into routine care is a slow and unpredictable process. To speed up this development and to attain a wide dissemination, this study aims at identifying the decision-making process of the first use (adoption process) of an e-health service from the user’s respectively patient’s perspective. Fifty seven conducted semi-structured problem-centered interviews reveal that the typical adoption process consists of the following six phases: (1) latency phase, (2) initiative phase, (3) information phase, (4) decision phase, (5) trial phase and (6) confirmation phase. These insights contribute to the adoption theory.

In order to guarantee a comprehensive analysis of the adoption process for e-health services, the paper has the following structure: A definition and a classification of e-health (services) as well as the theoretical concepts and a literature overview of the adoption process lay the foundation for the conducted study. In the following, the study description and the results of the qualitative e-health user interviews are presented. The paper ends with implications on theory and practice and a short outlook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kyratis et al. (2012) focus e.g., on the adoption and implementation of technology in primary and acute care organizations in England.

References

  • Ball MJ, Lillis J (2001) E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform 61(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux D (1981) From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In: Bertaux D (ed) Biography and society: the life history approach in the social sciences. Sage, London, pp 29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick DM (2003) Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 289(15):1969–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BITKOM (2013) BITKOM-Umfrage: Zahlungsbereitschaft für Apps steigt. http://www.marktforschung.de/nachrichten/marktforschung/bitkom-umfrage-zahlungsbereitschaft-fuer-apps-steigt. Accessed 06 Aug 2015

  • Bitner MJ, Booms BH, Tetreault MS (1990) The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J Mar 54(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C et al (2011) The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS One 8(1), e1000387

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SG, Wake DJ, Waller A et al (2014) Definitions of eHealth. In: Gaddi A, Capello F, Manca M (eds) eHealth, care and quality of life. Springer, Milano, pp 15–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong CC, Ros WJG, Schrijvers G (2014) The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 16(1), e19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF (2006) The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 40(4):314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach G (2001) What is eHealth? J Med Internet Res 3(2), e20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51(4):327–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick U (2014) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M et al (2012) Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 36(1):241–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon H, Robertson TS (1991) Innovative decision processes. In: Robertson TS, Kassarjian HH (eds) Handbook of consumer behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 316–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissbühler A (2012) eHealth: easing the transitions in healthcare. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13599

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassinger E (1959) Stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociol 24(1):52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2011a) The practice of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2011b) The practice of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G et al (2011) Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 13(4):450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann T (2013) Online-Marketing. Grundlagen der Absatzpolitik in der Net Economy. Verlag W Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyratis Y, Ahmad R, Holmes A (2012) Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts. BMJ Open 2, e000872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanseng EJ, Andreassen TW (2007) Electronic healthcare: a study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. Int J Serv Ind Manag 18(4):394–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan J, Graham ID (1998) Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun 20(2):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason M (2010) Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Soc Res 11(3), 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier CA, Fitzgerald MC, Smith JM (2013) eHealth: extending, enhancing, and evolving health care. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabih MI, Bloem G, Poiesz TBC (1997) Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Adv Consum Res 24(1):190–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A (2005) What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 7(1), e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P et al (2005) What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res 7(1), e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL et al (1996) The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. Med Care 34(9):873–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedone C, Chiurco D, Scarlata S et al (2013) Efficacy of multiparametric telemonitoring on respiratory outcomes in elderly people with COPD: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 13:82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramtohul I (2015) The adoption of e-health services: comprehensive analysis of the adoption setting from the user’s perspective. Health Policy Technol 4(3):286–293. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson TS (1971) Innovative behavior and communication. Holt, Rinehard and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003a) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003b) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003c) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, pp 168–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003d) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003e) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan B, Gross NC (1943) The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol 8(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Showell C, Nøhr C (2012) How should we define eHealth, and does the definition matter? Stud Health Technol Inform 180:881–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintonen S, Immonen M (2013) Telecare services for aging people: assessment of critical factors influencing the adoption intention. Comput Hum Behav 29(4):1307–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappenburg J, Niesink A, de Weert-van Oene G et al (2008) Effects of telemonitoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Telemed e-Health 14(2):138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzelepis F, Paul CL, Walsh RA et al (2011) Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(12):922–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee TTT (2003) Factors affecting new product adoption in the consumer electronics industry. Singap Manag Rev 25(2):51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ (2008) The precaution adoption process model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (eds) Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice, 4th edn. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp 123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel A (2000) The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Soc Res 1(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang NJ, Seblega B, Wan T et al (2013) Health information technology adoption in U.S. acute care hospitals. J Med Syst 37(2):9907

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Health Care Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany

    Isabel Ramtohul

Authors
  1. Isabel Ramtohul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Ramtohul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Managemnt, Center for Advanced Studies in Managemnt, Leipzig, Germany

    Horst Albach

  2. HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Managemnt, Center for Advanced Studies in Managemnt, Leipzig, Germany

    Heribert Meffert

  3. Leipzig Graduate School of Mgmt, Center for Advanced Studies in Managemnt, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

    Andreas Pinkwart

  4. HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Managemnt, Center for Advanced Studies in Managemnt, Leipzig, Germany

    Ralf Reichwald

  5. HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Managemnt, Center for Health Care Managemnt & Regul, Leipzig, Germany

    Wilfried von Eiff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramtohul, I. (2016). Identifying the Adoption Process for Electronic Health Services: A Qualitative Study. In: Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R., von Eiff, W. (eds) Boundaryless Hospital. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49012-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation