Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proaktives Verhalten: Schlüsselkompetenz für die Karriereentwicklung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Proaktives Verhalten beschreibt selbststartende, veränderungs- und zukunftsorientierte Handlungen, die darauf ausgerichtet sind, das berufliche Umfeld positiv zu beeinflussen. Empirische Befunde belegen die positive Bedeutung proaktiven Verhaltens für das Individuum, seine berufliche Laufbahnentwicklung und den Gesamterfolg von Organisationen. Führungskräfte können das proaktive Verhalten ihrer Beschäftigten fördern, indem sie vollständige Arbeitsaufgaben übertragen, eine gute Austauschbeziehung gestalten sowie positive Beispiele für Eigeninitiative und Verantwortungsübernahme etablieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, und newcomer learning: Integration socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 49(1), 192–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative und psychological safety, process innovations, und firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman und Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership und performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure und correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative und its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X493134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX und power distance in the United States und Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2000.4468066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Smith, T. A., Wang, J., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2014). Relative importance of leader influences for subordinates’ proactive behaviors, prosocial behaviors, und task performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs und organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 859–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00772.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Hüttges, A. (2016). Drawbacks of proactivity: Effects of daily proactivity on daily salivary cortisol und subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000042;10.1037/ocp0000042.supp (Supplemental).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). A look back to move ahead: New directions for research on proactive performance und other discretionary work behaviours. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 59(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00413.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., Lührmann, H., & Kohl, C. (2004). Proactive climate in a post-reorganization setting: When staff compensates managers’ weakness. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 13, 241–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2000). Entwicklung von Eigeninitiative: Neue Herausforderung für Mitarbeiter und Manager. In M. K. Welge, K. Häring & A. Voss (Hrsg.), Management development (S. 63–79). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Bd. 23, S. 133–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East und West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/256630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability und validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Garman, G., Garmeister, K., Halemba, K., Hortig, A., Pulwitt, T., & Schildbach, S. (2002). Training zur Erhöhung der Eigeninitiative bei Arbeitslosen: Bericht über einen Pilotversuch. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 46(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1026//0932-4089.46.2.89.

  • Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007a). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics und personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Krauss, S. I., Keith, N., Escher, S., Grabarkiewicz, R., Luneng, S. T., Friedrich, C. et al. (2007b). Business owners’ action planning und it’s relationship to business success in three African countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1481.

  • Frese, M., Tornau, K., & Fay, D. (2008). Forschung zur Analyse und Förderung der Eigeninitiative: Love it, leave it or change it. Zeitschrift für Personalführung, 3, 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactivity literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaub, M. E., Frese, M., Fischer, S., & Hoppe, M. (2014). Increasing personal initiative in small business managers or owners leads to entrepreneurial success: A theory-based controlled randomized field intervention for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(3), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value und how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W. (1998). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, V. C., Frese, M., Binnewies, C., & Schmitt, A. (2012). Happy und proactive? The role of hedonic und eudaimonic well-being in business owners’ personal initiative. Entrepreneurship Theory und Practice, 36(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00490.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions und organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T., Hellervik, L., & Gilmore, D. C. (1986). Behavior description interviewing. Boston: Alan & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents und their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P. (2015). Personalauswahl zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P., & Kanfer, F. H. (1982). Self-management und behaviour change: From theory to practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P. D., & Gao, X. Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality und work characteristics: A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency und proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/257011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective und subjective career success. A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., Bindl, U., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, K., & Moser, K. (2017). Ursachen und Auswirkungen von Arbeitslosigkeit: Folgen für die Laufbahngestaltung und Karriereberatung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, H., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Kompetenzmanagement in Organisationen: Ein Beitrag zur Laufbahnentwicklung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, B., Frese, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2007). Action regulation theory und career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, und initiative. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 53(3), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, und success. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701595438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality und career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speier, C., & Frese, M. (1997). Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator und moderator between control und complexity at work und personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10(2), 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spychala, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). The dark und the bright sides of proactive work behaviour und situational constraints: Longitudinal relationships with task conflicts. European Journal of Work und Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 654–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.487646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts und their incremental validities. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 62(1), 44–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2015). ‚Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts und their incremental validities‘: Corrigendum. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 64(4), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored und contest mobility und the school system. American Sociological Review, 25, 855–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping und voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct und predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measures. Educational und Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors und outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wihler, A., Blickle, G., Ellen, B. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Personal initiative und job performance evaluations: Role of political skill in opportunity recognition und Journal of Management, 43, 1388–1420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314552451.

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Annett Hüttges

  2. Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Doris Fay

Authors
  1. Annett Hüttges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doris Fay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annett Hüttges .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie Arbeits-, Organisations- und Sozialpsychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

    Simone Kauffeld

  2. Institut für Psychologie Abteilung Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Daniel Spurk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hüttges, A., Fay, D. (2019). Proaktives Verhalten: Schlüsselkompetenz für die Karriereentwicklung. In: Kauffeld, S., Spurk, D. (eds) Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48750-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48749-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48750-1

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation