Skip to main content

A Case Study of Politics Over Local Knowledge and Practices in Marine Protected Area Development and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Culture, Education and Globalization
  • 1517 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter looks into the mixture of Filipino politics that has either driven or hindered the promotion of marine protected area (MPA) as a conservation tool. Although this tool promises food security, some local poor fishers perceived it as “fencing the sea” that deprived them of their basic source of subsistence. Incidentally, some politicians have taken political advantage of this sentiment and rallied behind these fishers. Political turnovers and partisanship in local politics as well as the cultural politics of representations, evident in conflicting resource use, and conservation ethics of different stakeholders are contributory factors for potential MPA failure. This case study calls for transdisciplinary support, where social science can help natural science in navigating the waves and undercurrents of local political dynamics and in understanding the intricacies of local knowledge and practices in order to ensure MPA success and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcala, A. C. (2001). Marine reserves in the Philippines: Historical development, effects and influence on marine conservation policy. Makati: Bookmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabanban, A. S., & White, A. T. (1981). Marine conservation program using non-formal education at Apo Island, Negros Oriental, Philippines. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Coral Reef Symposium (Vol. 1). Manila.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, G. (2006). Interdisciplinary works: Patterns and practicalities. Philippine sociological review, 54, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. (2004). Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in southeast Asia. In J. B. Shipley (Ed.), Aquatic protected areas as fisheries management tools: Design, use and evaluation of these fully protected areas (pp. 155–164). Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., & White, A. T. (2007). Best practices for improved governance of coral reef marine protected areas. Coral Reefs, 26, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., McCay, B. J., Miller, M. L., Lowe, C., White, A. T., Stoffle, R., et al. (2003). Toward developing a complete understanding: A social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries, 28(12), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. S. (1978). The use and misuse of social science research. Philippine sociological review, 26, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deguit, E. T. (1989). Community organization as a methodology in implementing marine conservation program in two island communities Central Visayas: A case study. Unpublished Thesis, Social Work, Asian Social Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, R. (2003). Studying politics. In R. Dyck (Ed.), Studying politics: An introduction to political science (pp. 7–24). Canada: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, J. F. (2005). Coastal resource management and social differences in Philippine fishing communities. Human ecology, 33, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisma, R.V. (2004). Local governance for municipal fisheries: Can local governments afford to have coastal resource management as a basic service responsibility? In DA-BFAR (Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources). In turbulent seas: The status of Philippine marine fisheries. Coastal Resource Management Project of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Cebu City, Philippines. pp. 180–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, P. R. Jr. (2009). The Philippines: Governance and management for a complex ecosystem, 51(3). Retrieved June 27, 2009 from www.environmentmagazine.org.

  • Hajer, M., & Fischer, F. (1999). Beyond global discourse: The rediscovery of culture in environmental politics. In F. Fisher & M. A. Hajer (Eds.), Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse (pp. 1–20). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hind, E. J., Hiponia, M. C., & Gray, T.S. (2009). From community-based to centralized national management—A wrong turning for the governance of the marine protected area in Apo Island, Philippines? Marine policy. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., & Pascual-Fernandez, J. J. (2011). What are MPAs for: On goal formation and displacement. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, G. K., White, A. T., & Christie, P. (2009). Scaling up to networks of marine protected areas in the Philippines: Biophysical, legal, institutional, and social considerations. Coastal Management, 37, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, M. B. (2004). Social dimensions of marine reserves. In J. Sobel & C. Dahlgren (Eds.), Marine reserves: A guide to science, design and use (pp. 164–186). Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meňez, M. A. (2008). Philippine CBCRM: Lessons from an analysis of participation patterns. In K. L. Gollin & J. L. Kho (Eds.), After the romance: Communities and environmental governance in the Philippines (pp. 133–151). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, N., Christie, P., Oram, R., Eisma, R. & White, A. (2003). Integrated coastal management process sustainability reference book. Cebu City, Philippines: University of Washington School of Marine Affairs, Silliman University, and the Coastal Resource Management Project of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and cultural theory: Exploring the role of anthropology in environmental discourse. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. (2005). Social science for marine protected areas. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Service Center and the National Marine Protected Area Center. Retrieved October 22, 2006 from www.csc.noaa.gov/mpass.

  • NRC (National Research Council). (2001). Marine protected areas: Tools for sustaining ocean ecosystems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oracion, E. G. (2006). A mayor and his politics for marine protected areas: A case study in the political anthropology of environmentalist discourse. Philippine quarterly of culture and society, 34, 338–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oracion, E. G., Miller, M. L., & Christie, P. (2005). Marine protected areas for whom? Fisheries, tourism and solidarity in a Philippine community. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac, R., & Seara, T. (2011). Factors influencing success of marine protected areas in the Visayas. Philippines as related to increasing protected area coverage, Environmental management, 47, 584–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. E., & Abeare, S. M. (2009). Fishing effort redistribution in response to area closures. Fisheries Research, 99, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte, C. (2011). The sacred commons: Conflicts and solutions of resource management in sacred natural sites. Biological Conservation, 144, 2387–2394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvert, W., & Moustakas, A. (2011). The impacts over time of marine protected areas: A null model. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 312–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suuronen, P., Jounela, P., & Tschernij, V. (2010). Fishermen responses on marine protected areas in the Baltic cod fishery. Marine policy, 34, 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO and ISSC (2010). World social science report: Knowledge divides-Summary. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Social Science Council, France. Retrieved September 25, 2010 from www.unesco.org/shs/wssr.

  • Veiga, P., Pita, C., Leite, L., Ribeiro, J., Ditton, R. B., Gonc-alves, J. M. S., & Erzini, K. (2013). From a traditionally open access fishery to modern restrictions: Portuguese anglers’ perceptions about newly implemented recreational fishing regulations. Marine policy, 40, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. T., Alino, P.M., & Meneses, A. T. (2006). Fisheries improved for Sustainable Harvest Project, Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation Inc. In Creating and Managing Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines. Cebu City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). Scaling up marine management: The role of marine protected areas. (World Bank Report # 36635-GLB.Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique G. Oracion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oracion, E.G. (2016). A Case Study of Politics Over Local Knowledge and Practices in Marine Protected Area Development and Management. In: Xing, J., Ng, Ps. (eds) Indigenous Culture, Education and Globalization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48158-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48159-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics